The eugenic economy

More than 15% of the population are literally useless.

This won’t end well.

Most of this hovering percentage (depending where you draw the line, with machine replacement) are male.

Society has no answer for this. There is no logical way to pander to them and save society from the thing sinking it aka them.

Einstein really hated white men, because the public introduction of nukes (muh publication and global display) has made it so we can’t cull our own useless eaters (the angry gamma types that hate authority, women and standards).

This is the death sentence of not cutting out cancer because it’s technically your own cells.

That’s what this has done. This is the start of dysgenics, nothing else.

I’m sure cancer cells would call for Muh Loyalty so the Titanic doesn’t patch its own hull and bail out water.

Breeding only comes a while after considerations of birth (i.e. the fact you must be born to be a parental candidate). Regression to the mean also pummels every population. This isn’t a one-time sweep.

Gammas: “muh right side of the bell curve!”

About that:

Here’s one study they cherry-pick:

A grand total of two points. Don’t build your spaceships to escape the cooties just yet.”

And even there, look at the other half. Literally. Everything to the left of 1SD.

“When it comes to geniuses, these guys are trying to claim they’re Einstein by association.
That is retarded. Claim to be Hercules at least, he was male too. Aim high in your delusion.”

They hate authority because, being too stupid to be able to complete instructions, they assume the instructor hates them. They hate women because we’re sensitive to avoid any indicator of retarded offspring (ultimate waste of investment, more than being barren and caring for relatives). They hate standards because they know, deep down, in any society they’d be inferior and it would be out of reach. This makes them spiteful e.g. the anti-merit of barring women from colleges when they qualify. If you really think women are dumber, what do you care if you’d get in? Logically, they’d want weaker aka dumber people as their competition (why white SJWs want non-white SJWs in college). They think everyone cheats (college scandal) because they have to. Academia is now run by cheats (replication crisis) and its reputation under conservatives is no longer present.

This will lead to dystopia, which we’re already seeing moderately ripe fruits of.

They feel threatened by anyone because everyone is, statistically, an intellectual threat.

This explains chimp-outs at completely normal people and whatever the white version is, the mantrum?

The omegas are quiet and fine, the classic manual labourers.  They mix the drinks, pick the food, clean the guns. Gammas have delusions of grandeur (supported by equalism) and when they fail, they’re the revenge fantasists. The low IQ/aggression link comes through there.

The SJWism started in the military when they forgot their purpose – cull the people society cannot feed.

This no below-X requirement is convenient for SJWs, who tend to be lower on the IQ scale themselves and oddly fearful of a draft that hasn’t happened since the last century.

The military have been pussies since world wars one and two, when, wouldn’t you know it, men started to go soft.

Yeah, because you practiced a dysgenic cull. In war, there’s always a cull. Introducing exemptions on age or fitness or IQ or mental malingering or having Daddy Moneybags will kill the country more surely than the cause.

Men went weak because of this. They over-compensate now with machines, all the gadgets in the world won’t help when your national IQ is declining. America needed Operation Paperclip or we’d all be speaking Russian now, because those non-white poor huddled masses from the previous 50 years had overbred.

Zero sum funding, the smart or the stupid. All the money to ‘rehabilitate’ criminals, to prison PS4s, to the translator in a primary school is money away from real art, real culture, real innovation, actual intelligence. It is costing you already.

Dumb men being arse-covered by greedy ones. There are far, far more male criminals, aren’t there?

In terms of a genetic product, that is a quality issue. The SJWs sense this but draw the wrong conclusions. We already have touchy-feely men, they’re in politics keeping the stupid mass of men going, for fun and profit.

Fun: anti-fa.


You can’t sell junk food to kids living with both married parents eating home-cooked fare.

Football matches used to be a lot cheaper and had white, native players. Beer used to be cheaper and better. Clothes used to be non-plastic and retain a shape. You’ve lost everything your sex used to value. What happened to the trades? The technical colleges? The pubs?

The list goes on, classism feeds into it. Grow the poor with their feeblest like the reverse of making a thoroughbred, how they organise their own class breeding. You end up with fat Americans in a walmart blubbering along oohing and aahing in the playmobil mobile.

You were betrayed by your fellow man, women have got shit to do with that. We were often banned outright from those positions, it’s literally impossible. The main qualification was a dick, IQ didn’t matter to you, Mr Boys Club “have you met my shitbag of a son?“, so you kinda deserve this. If you wanna bring up YKW, well, Cromwell invited them back in. This blindspot shows how dumb the average white nationalist is.

Run the numbers.

None of you wanna bring in anti-nepotism law that requires the hire was of AVERAGE competence for the role.

(whispers) average

or this shit happens


This saccharine naive libertarian “my fellow male would never betray me” – when competition and deceit is THE point of capitalism! THE point! The only one!

That’s the pleasant theoretical version, actual volume is worse.

After WW2 in particular, the remaining men (most undeserving cowards, frauds etc) were left a plethora of women to breed with. These military restrictions are r-selected and treasonous to national interests.

No coincidence their children were druggy hippies. Quelle surprise. The shittiest cultural movement in human history. To match the biggest dysgenic cull 20-30 years prior.

I posted this before as “where did all the good men go?” dead, mostly.

A gamma at this point would pipe up: why not the women?

Well, women didn’t evolve to fight, for one. It’s fairer to force 50yo Harold than 20yo Cindy Lou.

Ultimately, it must be this way around though, since men can’t butt heads like rams anymore to sexually compete or duel, the civilized equivalent (that gangs, sports, the gym seek to emulate, weakly).

Bringing back duelling to the death between two consenting parties (like boxing minus gloves) would have the same eugenic effect on a smaller scale. It’s a check and balance also backed by the death penalty for various heinous crimes, that also, wouldn’t you know it, was taken off the books by weaklings.

Rules in sport prevent death – but that is the purpose of sport. Today, only narcissists enter sport, knowing they will not die. Further, they get to bully and ‘fight’ aka play fight, like a child. There are fewer restraints on children fighting, think about that. We also mix the schools to blur gender, so weak boys can hit girls. That sounds like a society that can recover its civilization. Men also had all sorts of evolved responses in a fight, many male animals try to tear or bite one another’s nuts off. I can’t imagine many ‘well hard’ MMA bitches wanting to enter a ring if THAT were an option.

But that’s a real fight. There are no rules, except try not to die.

The modern Olympics is a joke, people went to watch the athletes compete, really compete, which means possibly die.

Women have fake tits, men have fake balls. That’s why modern women don’t respect gym bros. Even gym girls cheat on them. That’s why. Boys with sometimes implanted muscles or chemically fake muscles who’d shriek like a bitch if you ‘broke the rules’.

What rules? Real fighting has no sodding rules, nancy boy. Go back even to the 1950s and they’d all be considered flaming effeminate cuntmuffins. They’re all ponces in their little shorts with their waxed chest and homoerotic bragging. Why don’t women want kids anymore? Well… look at the options.

I asked a military bloke if he wanted to go running: “nah, it’s too cold.”

There was a light drizzle and it was about 12C. That counts as warm here.

I tried to take the piss and the excuse was ‘he couldn’t get sick’. Sure. Fucking sure.

A lot of these sports people are fake outdoorsy, they’re scared of rain and cold.

No coincidence they move from colder places to LA or Australia. Bloody wimps.

‘but what about the women?’ – gammas who imagine women have it easy because they’re really that dumb

The low IQ women don’t breed anyway, either because no man wants to marry it (in civilized places where marriage happens before spawn) or because their stupidity kills their kids with the wrong food or neglect (r-parenting, including abortion).

Peterson tells you half the truth, that’s the rest.

What do we do with the dipshits?

Good question. Don’t mention most of them are men, that demo might get triggered.

Past a certain point of genetic deterioration and cultural degeneration, even the lowliest woman will calculate men are too weak to even risk breeding with. They wait until after the next cull – if not war, famine, disease etc. like a capitalist retaining their productivity under socialism. EXACTLY like that, it’s the other sex’s method of preservation of energy.  Look at the surveys predicting (women hoping) everything gets worse. For a ‘baby boom’ you need a war first to sweep out the dregs of men, that’s a rule of history and this is why.

Eliminate outgroup race (30-40% in some areas), from that remainder then eliminate other religions or no religion (90%) and then not mental (50% or so remaining probably on meds that hide their psychotic tendencies) and who is left?

That’s without looking into high IQ (105+) because the past two generations either aborted to afford a few more holidays or they never found marriage material dating back to the post-WW2 shit tier bullshit.

You killed the golden goose. Globalization is a horseman in better threads.

This kinda shit annoys me because it isn’t Gen X/Y/Z’s actual fault.

Credit: Master Brew

Kids cost too much! We’re already funding immigrant ones! Plus lazy retirees! Plus foreign aid! We can barely afford rent! Still, I see birth rate memes.

How’s about pro-marriage memes for men?

The controlled ops wouldn’t like that, would probably fill it with mixed couples or IVFs. Therein lies the problem. How many of you arseholes have actually sat down and read the Race Relations Act? US or UK? That’s when the SJWs won. When you cannot legally walk away. That document cements forced multiculturalism aka white genocide.

Below a certain level, I don’t think an adult can actually BE a parent, yet we don’t require an IQ test for a breeding license because feefees. Human rights are granted automatically at 18, even if their mental age is always 14.

Aw, but morons who believe in man cards don’t want to be objectively independently tested, we’re meant to just trust their word they’re superior yet oppressed! Bring back SATs, FFS, before it’s too late!

Blame women for the dropping white male brain size compared to Asians, while you’re at it!

Is it our fault you lost fifty units of brain size over a few generations?

This is what happens when you fund the prosperity of the competition. You weaken the ingroup, it’s zero sum.

Upsetting idiots or a future, pick one.

Especially broflakes feefees online, where they’re all magically 130IQ but can’t construct a sentence where I don’t wish to scratch my eyes out. Shoot teachers who help students cheat, I’m serious. Do you want a dense surgeon or a thicko pilot? If education is serious, cheating it is cheating society aka treason. Meritocracy requires you punish cheats severely.

A child can just be punished by omission aka permanent record, nobody will hire, booted out of school.

NO bailouts.

No “oh my Bobby’s a rebel” bullshit from weak patriarchs.

THAT is real nationalism, a tight ship.

A purely “white is right” West has never existed because it would’ve been swarmed by its own idiots long before any success. There need to be strong discussions of what to do with the subhuman (neurologically, that’s what low IQ is, like a brain atavism from genetic load, their brain never completes adult development) in our own populations (certainly no incentives or celebrations!) and those we imported from the hillbilly nations of Europe e.g. Poland, with their child thieves and mother-whores bankrupting the NHS maternity wards at “fellow white’s” existential expense.

YOU have to live with this.

We have a dysgenic breeding pool, a eugenic economy, open borders, high crime and a huge debt state.

This won’t end pleasantly.

But fine – ignore me. Fine by me. No skin off my nose.

I’ve been saying this shit for literally years.

If you believe…

Excellent bait. I’ll take that.

The “supremacist” entry is actually two things, it “doesn’t follow” logically that they have any connection.

Every culture thinks itself the best, this is called patriotism and the basic instinct is called genophilia, it’s in the dictionary and you can check for it.

On the other hand, the second part is a foreign policy based on colonies, which put the domestic citizen at a long-term disadvantage, a form of pathological altruism, to make the first colonists filthy rich. As you can see, there is an error here.

A more interesting chart would be foundational premises or possible ones to each. No belief is theoretically irrational however impossible or unwise practically, there is a premise.

I humbly submit a proof list subject to change or criticism.

  • I have a right to my body, my genetic continuation and the homeland my ancestors bled for. Freedom of association.
  • There are irreconcilable differences between groups of humans and for global peace, each must be respectful to stay away from the others’ homeland/s. Nothing exclusive and protective. Golden Rule doesn’t exist. The Buddhists lost to Islam. To compromise with evil is to enable and absorb it.
  • I am a human and my kin have rights as such. This…. shouldn’t need to be said. Regions = reservations. I think a more subtle point might be underlying that Native group ought never slave (pay taxes from labour* and forced confiscation) for the out-group. No racial plantations, even if they’re desk jobs. Hostilities are guaranteed based on Darwinian genetic competition and what is earned by group A is the sovereign right (coffer) of Group A. That if the tax revenue were kept within-group, group B must earn their own keep (and A’s respect) or go home if they intend to live on largess as a dependent, the only remaining issue of intra-racial class would be simple to handle as a society (for largely IQ-communication reasons) without the scientific gunpowder of race relations that destroyed America.
  • You know the struggles and achievements of your group for your (future then, present now) benefit and refuse to deny them like a Thomas. Anyone in your land or expecting the fruits of this ancestral labour (legally a delayed gift to one’s kin ONLY) connotes a responsibility to lead and direct these exclusive resources (if there is a surplus chosen to share by the within-group, outward) so they are not squandered on those who would not appreciate them like good seeds on rocks. For example, if you want the beer, be nice to the brewer and don’t try to take over from him in his own brewery. Draws on White notions of guest right and opposes odious debt for emotional appeal.
  • Ah, you thought I wouldn’t touch this one, huh? Well, I’m not a wimp. Considering the inception of nuclear armament and the inevitability that some low-IQ dolt will get angry with access at some point, we either disarm the groups who stole technology they have abused to oppress their people, who cannot morally understand how to manage it OR try to restructure their societies according to a more responsible model (imperialism). This won’t work. There is an impasse where the biological differences are too great and many groups are annihilative, religious ones. You cannot reason with a deluded person. Eventually, they claim, they intend to swarm us by over-population (soldiers). A first strike as a defensive manoeuvre is the only strategy to prevent imminent invasion at some point in this century as global resources contract to their NORMAL levels before the false Pied Piper markets of globalization. War is always triggered by this contraction historically. They have been murdering and raping and invading our people for (centuries). They hate us and show cruelty even to their own people, children and animals. We are long overdue an active strategy to re-assert our soft power considering we have a narrow demographic window with which to secure our homeland. Our populations cannot raise recklessly (nor would we wish this) because of farming limits and cost of living being dragged by demand. Quality of citizen over births in abusive situations. We use our IQ advantages and cut off parasitic groups that are already hostile and awaiting opportunity. Technology can fight for us?
  • n.b. Considering they refuse to control their population in a “demographic transition” aka How the First World happened, yet feel entitled to our living standards and money, they will collapse our economy before we help them and if you look at Africa, two centuries plus of Christian interventions made them worse (more people, worse diseases, more corrupt). Our altruism to the outgroup is a pathological arrogant act to feel superior, a countersignal we could never actually afford, an error from Ice Age cooperation we did not evolve past yet; causing a genocide to our own people directly (no reciprocity – I don’t see Africans donating food to UK food banks) and in what should’ve been invested back to the in-group who are owed assistance and the help to thrive, (no guilt) including infrastructure and technological advantage. The foreign populations will be knocked down by famine as the UN themselves suspect this century. It would be kinder to control their populations by force now. If they cannot even survive with a reduced, more intelligent population, the best possible chance and gift we could give, they are ill-adapted to the modern world and nature should be allowed to take its course. It’s God’s will. They don’t care about their own survival? Why should we?

Is that somewhere around the rationales given? They could be tested.

Nowhere to put this but a policy idea of missionaries. Anyone who signals (other) culture is so superior must move there to improve it, than import it and burden everyone else (the r-strategy, Cloward-Piven). On the legally binding condition they can never return or beg to be rescued. I’d make it into a TV show.

*Corvee slavery, a little about.

An example of how fundamentally illegal this system is, the taxes of white women in Europe who cannot save the money to have children, are being used to pay for a non-white woman’s children she didn’t consent to make and has no parental responsibilities toward. She is forced to spend X hours per week working so another woman can confiscate her earnings and live off them like a master.

Taxpayers! Calculate how many hours per week you slave for someone else.

You plug the hole in the boat before bailing out water. You prevent the larger, external pressure mounting before addressing local problems. Whites are the minority of the world and should be treated the best, according to social justice.
With rising debt per head in the West, look at a debt clock, the whole world must be enslaved a la the Corvée system at some point, it’s mathematically inevitable. The money we give/gave to say, Africa, will need to be paid back …with interest. The non-whites who drastically outnumber us must be sent the full bill at some point, including punishing interest. Considering most of these people can barely earn a dollar a day, such is the economic demand for their IQ in the time of machines and robots, mass suicide is likely. Or… war. Ah, margin calls.

It was an investment, not a gift.
Having mis-spent it, they still owe it.

China is sweeping in to try and claim this White investment (including literal purchase of white homeland, as if we’ll respect any illegal property right to what is ours!) and they will have no moral problem with killing hungry mouths across Africa when they complain. Their soldiers aren’t playing.

It isn’t charity. It has never been charity. It has been bribery and odious debt.
It isn’t charity with someone else’s money, it is theft. Tony Blair is rich, the soldiers he lied to are dead. The nation he deceived is poorer for his terms.

Naturally none of this matters if you don’t unpick who causes all these problems and put them on trial. Otherwise, these things will happen again.

top comment

If wakanda can exist in their minds then so should whitekanda

top reply

They have Wakanda, we have Albion

White nationalism’s creepy fertility cult
It’s bachelor types telling everyone to breed.
Oh, me? No, I’m not dumb enough to marry! type.

“But other people, men and women alike, have a different calling. No one is obliged to breed. No one should be shamed for not having children. (Rather, one should be shamed for having children, then neglecting or abusing them, as all too often happens.)” – A K trying to reason with r

“White nationalists who try to shame, bully, and guilt-trip others into parenthood on account of their whiteness are not expressing a desire for more children to be loved, cared for, and appreciated for their inherent worth. Instead, they want more ivory-colored pawns to be placed on the global demographic chessboard. Whether these children are loved or not, appreciated or not, whether their parents are worthy or not, appears to be of secondary importance. The main thing is to “make more of us!””

Pull up a chair, sit down son.

IQ density is important.
Population density is a weakness in times of economic downturn (now) and famine (soon). Why else would Asia be overflowing and crawling over one another like locusts to leave? If it’s so damn prosperous?
Many of the ‘refugees’ coming to Europe are from ASIA. Look it up!
We want the fewest whites possible to die in a famine, it’s that simple. Thankfully, we’re K-selected and all our children survive infancy, we’ve already controlled our breeding to sustainable levels in Europe.
Yes, sustainability, the topic you must discuss in demographics to have any legitimacy and hardly anyone ever does.

There is no sustainability without a controlled fertility rate.

We need to fix the multicultural problem, then food security – and we’ll be mostly fine. We’ll adapt and survive.
How often do you hear about the food security issue?
The elites don’t tell you. Oh, but they’re buying Apocalypse bunkers in New Zealand! The Guardian even covered it, brainlessly.

R-types migrate en masse when the Malthusian trap is about to snap shut.
You don’t talk Malthus? All your predictions are off!

The people pushing this don’t want 18 rugrats of their own.
They want someone else to pay for their party lifestyle and expected pension. They want you to invest, for them. Your time, their dependency.
They want more socialism. They don’t want the gravy train to stop before they’ve emptied it.
They’re not right-wing, that’s why. They can’t parasite your children if you fail to have any. They have a family fetish because they know the taxes will keep them in STD shots and Pills for their sluts.
It’s a GOOD, eugenic thing that men and women who don’t want to breed, fail to breed.
Most men didn’t breed throughout history. It’s a quality filter.
It’s about time the women had the choice to opt-out.
Why would you want those genes in your children?

We must praise good husbands, wives and families.
Naturally, men must marry before expecting children.
The fertility problem is a marriage problem.
I’ll repeat it until it sinks in.

You never mention it.

However, we mustn’t encourage the r-selected, who will try to twist and distort to outnumber us and use our programmes against us, see war widow pensions and the beginning of the welfare state. Reward the Ks, oppress the r.
The TRUE problem.
Africa has about a billion people.
China has more, slightly.

Which is a bigger threat to the West?

The Asian population is over half the world. Literally, over half the pie.
You can’t control them like blacks can be (gibs and grievance), I’d say the refugee problem is a mass red herring. Once you have Asians just in a company, they only hire and promote other Asians. The ingroup preference makes it impossible to cooperate with them. Inviting them in is a Trojan Horse labelled Chinese Food.

It’s deliberate, they don’t want other Asians because they know.

Why China Isn’t Hosting Syrian Refugees

Given what you know about supply/demand, why do you want to invite economic competition when you can barely afford to support a family on two jobs as it is, when they’re still in China??! Are you mad??!

We don’t need more white people than we currently have. We need to be sustainable in our native homelands, of better quality with superior K-selected childrearing habits.
To see it in terms of a raw numbers game is so spergy.

The solution to the dysgenics of the Third World isn’t to imitate the dysgenics of the Third World because it looks like they’re winning during the middle of the match.

Use your size as your strength.

Link: Is Trump actually a Nazi?
Nah but if he gets assassinated they don’t want to feel bad.
It’s like how anti-war people say they’d kill Hitler.

“I have a different perspective. Back in October 2015, I wrote that the picture of Trump as “the white power candidate” and “the first openly white supremacist candidate to have a shot at the Presidency in the modern era” was overblown. I said that “the media narrative that Trump is doing some kind of special appeal-to-white-voters voodoo is unsupported by any polling data”, and predicted that:

If Trump were the Republican nominee, he could probably count on equal or greater support from minorities as Romney or McCain before him.

Now the votes are in, and Trump got greater support from minorities than Romney or McCain before him. You can read the Washington Post article, Trump Got More Votes From People Of Color Than Romney Did, or look at the raw data (source)

Trump made gains among blacks. He made gains among Latinos. He made gains among Asians. The only major racial group where he didn’t get a gain of greater than 5% was white people. I want to repeat that: the group where Trump’s message resonated least over what we would predict from a generic Republican was the white population.”



Drawbridge effect.

So it is K-stimulus, just affecting other immigrants to stop the flood of competition.

Comic: Antisocial media


Fear white people.
Mock white people.

White people are dying and redundant. Whites will be history.
White people are coming back, stronger than ever. There is no such thing as white genocide.

There is no such thing as reverse racism.
There is no such thing as racism against whites.
There is no such thing as white people.
There is such a thing as white privilege.
There is such a thing as white supremacy.
There is no such thing as white supremacy.
There is no such thing as anti-white.
There is no such thing as a white nation.
There is such a thing as white nationalism.

Fuck, writing all that out at once really drives it home, huh?

snort lol laugh haha hmph derision yeah duh really uhuh mhmm princess bride

Link: White nationalism as a survival strategy

Ooh, game theory related.

I think of it from the reverse perspective.
If you want to know how to beat your opposite at chess, you imagine yourself as your opponent.

Well, SJWs are pushing this, the rhetoric that becomes policy.
SJWs project. They project their greatest fears into reality: everyone who disagrees is Hitler, free speech is bigoted because reality is unequal and the physical problem is White people.

OK. So their problem is White people. What should those people do to dispense with the temporary enemy?

If we trash their belief system it will never take hold again. It took them decades to march through the institutions like this and now we know the enemy, we can name the enemy and have preventative strategies against their entryism. They’re cornered and they know it. They’ve turned on one another like cannibals to last a little longer as the money tap dries up.

The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Europe, in particular, has a long history of tribal alliance and putting aside our differences to deal with a common enemy. Our sense of fair play and the Rules of Englishmen are Euro-conventions, nowhere else in the world are they capable of this cooperation. Neither are we without guile. The man who wrote the book on manipulation was Italian. There are many slumbering giants among us. Every generation has them. These people are not narcissists and will not be found on a Youtube channel, peddling a blog with supplement ads or e-books. They’re out there IRL doing things. They have the skills we need. Think of it like a superhero team. Individually, we might get taken down. Collectively, with our strengths, we’re invincible (and yes, I count Russia, Western Russia). We shouldn’t assume that silence is tacit agreement, and the common man is against us, that’s SJW programming. To make us feel isolated. Many people want to do something and have no idea what. They need a positive vision. A peaceful action plan. Something inspiring.

The SJWs, with their ‘critical theory’ of nagging and bitching, could never compete.
Inspiration is a joke to them.

What strikes fear in collectivists?
A bigger crowd.

These problems are not going away. Their Orwellian command of language (Diversity is unity, a true strength) and books like Rules for Radicals, along with their mastery of protests and public influence at debates, have trounced the Right. Objecting politely is the blunt tool of cuckservatives, with no idea what they’re meant to be preserving. You could have a diverse table of European weeaboos, Europhiles and Anglophiles, they can dress and speak and act however they want, embrace the culture, they’ll never be European. Fighting a cultural battle is giving the enemy ground, because they have been slowly infiltrating the bastions of intellectual standard. Remember, when run by conservatives, Universities used to be good. [OT: And here, totally free, which really pisses off the Leftists when you remind them. They could justify the costs because standards were high and hardly anyone attended. The economy thrived and wages were higher because few people abroad were competing.]

They’ve been successfully executing a divide and conquer strategy on White people for decades.
By sex, nation, sexuality, anything to avoid the racial element. Anything that makes us turn on each other is aggression away from them, the cause. Let’s you and him fight. No more.
If you accept the premise of your enemy’s tactics without question, you accept defeat.
Why not try the opposite? Things can hardly get worse, can they? Realistically?

It matters because one thing doesn’t negate the other. White Nationalism doesn’t have to negate individual ethnic nationalism or identity. White Nationalism is possible as a temporary arrangement. As a tactic.

We are at war. We are being targeted as a whole, because we are White. Other groups have always defined us as “the White man”, that is all they see, they couldn’t care less about your special unique culture. This is not an individual issue about the fate of France, but not Spain, of Ireland but not Austria. It’s all of us together at the same time. Europeans are being targeted as a group. So we MUST respond as a group.

White Nationalism doesn’t have to be a permanent arrangement. We don’t have to erase Denmark to save Europe, but what good will it do to Denmark if the rest of Europe is lost but only it remains?

What happens at the end of a tournament? You go home.
What happens at the end of a fight? The victor goes home.

The conditions of war make the exceptions of peacetime. 

Last time, depending on what you count, either Vienna, the Crusades or Vlad the Impaler pretending to be batshit saved Europe from the current threat. Also, for wording, can we stop using extremism? Extreme beliefs mean nothing. Communists are extreme on property. The SJWs are using it as a synonym for terrorism (a criminal act) and we’re letting them. Soon having certain extremist beliefs will be enough, in pre-crime logic. They have a sliding scale of ‘fascism’ and we shouldn’t feed it. We are not reporters or biased journalists. Say what you mean, say Muslim terrorism.

Name the enemy. Mention Leftists secrets like the Progressive Stack, and how Muslims are at the top. Mention the soft bigotry of low expectations. Read their books, learn their linguistic tricks.

Keep it peaceful. Keep it positive.

While that’s still an option.

Deport the White man from politics and see what happens

The surest way to ruin an idiot is to give them power. They can’t lead, they’re incompetent and they’ll fail.

Forgive me for disbelieving that Trump is Jesus (idolatry, no better a celebrity than a Kardashian whore) and the Savior of America. The American People need to save themselves and always have done. I find him quite timid considering the problems and he is too lax on subjects like guns. Typical rich kid, I don’t believe he’d fight to defend anything, he just wants attention and will say anything. It just so happens that playing Devil’s Advocate nowadays is anti-PC.
Not to mention, if he can’t commit to a marriage, how can he commit to a job of a few years? The Bible Belt will see this. He lacks constancy and he was born into a rich family. He has no moral authority to speak of marriage and religion when he lacks faith himself. All politicians are hypocrites, it’s a matter of degree, and trumpeting his Whiteness or manliness (being crass to random women is actually a mark of insecurity as a man, but whatever) is a sign you don’t have any sound policies to actually discuss (the way Hillary plays the woman card and Sanders the poor, like a fiddle).
I’m bored of Trump, he lowers himself to insults too often when he had the moral high ground. He dispenses ad hominem when he stutters and runs out of ideas (he isn’t classically smart) so he can’t object when people do it to him, he preferentially insults people instead of addressing the question at hand. He’s immature, and his wealth, the bubble of it, probably has something to do with that.
I’m more interested in whoever comes after. They might be a real Christian and actually support policies than a half-hearted maybe. I looked into him and various business ventures have failed disastrously, Trump resorts show what a braggart and over-promiser he is. They’re only falling for it because he’s 1. male, 2. White, 3. rich, 4. insulting feminists. Forgive me if I think the Saviour of America would be too classy to make period jokes. How is that not alienating voters? Most women are not feminists, if you look at the damn data.

Politicians ignore reality. Political correctness is Fantastical wrongness, a polite term for professional liars.
I think Trump might be ineffectual in office, he’s blagging his way in like a business pitch but I’m happy to see him stick to his guns.

“As things come unwound both at home and abroad, the White man won’t just be sitting back eating popcorn, laughing at the chaos of a world that doesn’t want him anymore. No, he will be directly affected. Instead, he will be cleaning his gun and coming to the conclusion that when you become a minority, then it may be time to give up on democracy.”

This is an interesting way for fence-sitting r-types to justice their cowardice, aside from White Knighting and the pedestal nonsense. What about protecting your home and family? There’s even more risk in a dangerous environment. Sure, watch the people who think they’re so great, try and fail, but don’t toss the baby out with the bathwater and abandon your own communities, especially if you dare call yourself a masculine man. Pajama boys come up with an excuse to do nothing, it’s a delta/gamma thing.

A little note on SJWs and the wrong side of history gambit.

SJWs fear death. They hope their bundle of lies will create a legacy and make their sad lives worthwhile. In fact, they will die and no one will listen to them. That is what they cannot stand. They won’t matter, narcissists can’t stand the idea they’ll be gone. They’ll be dead and the silly laws will be abolished e.g. the oxymoron of ‘gay marriage’. Bad laws are rendered null over time, disused or abolished. Instead of giving out marriage licenses, a Caliphate (going by demographics) will go back to the good old days and kill the gay people by chucking them off buildings or hanging them, in the First World. What good will an old SCOTUS decision do then? We ignore the laws of slavery, don’t we? If everyone ignores them, they don’t exist.

Tying it together;

Nobody can deny that Trump is just as much a narcissist as the average feminist. It still remains a bad thing. Narcissists lie. A lot. The Right should stop sucking up to him just because he’s said some pretty words – he has DONE nothing. Until he DOES something, quit the hero worship.

Video: Greg Johnson’s ‘In defense of prejudice’

Pattern-seeking, also called patternicity, is innate to mammals.

It is a survival instinct.

We can no more switch it off than our perception of colour.

Ignore the patterns at your own peril.

When you recklessly imperil the lives of those around you, they’re going to perceive two threats.

Original Threat + Traitor

Where there one concept, there is its opposite.

Where there is loyalty, there is disloyalty.

Where there is safety, there is danger.

Endangering others? Makes you responsible too.

Scorpion and the Frog. A snake doesn’t change its nature.

As for the mathematics, this is truly probabilistic. I haven’t seen this application before but it’s dead-right. This is why social science has proven (and hates to admit) that stereotypes are mostly true. Prejudice being acting according to these, where there is individual information to the contrary that they are ‘not like that.’ Self-preservation and precaution (Christian prudence) are the psychologically healthy reactions to logical assessments of risk.

Tweet of the Year: r-types gonna r

r-typesgonnar crying laughter lmao

I could leave it there but for the slow people: they’re the same thing. Ask yourself: How many white women has he targeted, and on the basis of their race? Been through, thus far? Ruined for motherhood?

[h/t CH, read the poll on mudsharking with brown dick and weep]

Rs cannot perceive this deeper meaning. They think you’re just killing their buzz and making it personal. Nope, the rules exist for everyone or they don’t exist.

He’s literally trying to pull a No True Scotsman on traditional people, for being traditional. Practicing what they preach.

Say, how’s that traditional cult he wants to start going? The modern herbs aren’t going for it much, huh? It involves a lot of effort, and less blaming your problems on other people? Hmm. What a mystery, that one. Inferior men don’t want to step up, they want to complain about how someone is holding them down as an excuse to be lazy. Enabling them in this isn’t helping. Telling them to pull their socks up won’t make them real men, as he’ll discover by retention rates.

In case you think he’s being self-aware and ironic, he tweeted this immediately after about SJWs;

The dissociation game is a common subversion tactic used by the opposition to fracture movements, promote infighting.

david tennant 10 lol laughing cracking up

We’re winning. We’re totes winning. Cultural war. Moral war. Battle for a European future. He’s just pissed off Eastern Europe is growing a pair and protecting its women from being used like sex toys.

Since Roosh is now clearly dead-set against white nationalists, will the SJWs become nipsters ironically? Will they follow the path of the genius Hipster Racist? [check him out, the man is a God]

The problems facing the world have made themselves apparent.

All those ‘refugees’ aren’t going to Europe for the cash. There’s cash on every continent. They’re going for the white unchaperoned pussy. Roosh doesn’t like competition, despite writing books to make the cash to do it, encouraging others to imitate him. The dirty little secret of PUA? It’s mostly brown men who refuse to ‘settle’ for their own, ugly women. It’s brown men who feel entitled, racially obsessed with defiling white ‘whores’. Ruining us for the white men, subconsciously. It’s a rather racist practice, in many respects. That’s why I’m against it. r-types love to cause chaos in a gene pool and get a shot of dopamine at the same time. Theirs is the psychological damage of the male race mixer, forever feeling inferior and vengeful about it, as fat white women who mudshark, they are the flipside of the coin.

They like the idea of being followed but not the hard work of actually leading. r-types want to be first in line for everything, without strings, except a beatdown.

evil grin lol smile happy

Like fathers, brothers and uncles running him out of town, at best.

Welcome to Patriarchy, boys. We have men.

The Europe he returns to once this immigrant problem has resolved will be a Europe rediscovering its roots. I don’t think he’ll like what he finds. The question will be, who to target next: South America, or Asia? I think he’ll go America for the poverty angle, unless he believes the tighter pussy myth.

I’m surprised the SJWs haven’t doxxed his sister with the intention of sending a man to seduce her on hidden camera or something. Maybe I shouldn’t give them ideas. Shame seems to work on him very effectively, for someone so secure in their actions and moral righteousness (bravado, all puff). He bathes in attention, he chose to become a public figure. Why should merely pointing out his efforts to dilute a white woman’s legacy, that he targets us repeatedly, as a brown man, provoke a negative response? Isn’t he proud of himself?

Link: Apocalypse wow

The full GOV link herein is also completely worth the read.

Once Europeans go K, the Muslims will flee in large numbers, but that will take the misery and amygdala activation of K-selection to trigger.”

Once? His optimism warms the cockles of my Cockney heart. The British Government is so far gone it would sooner collapse than stop paying out benefits, which are truly bribes for Londonistan to hold off on rioting this week. I wonder what will happen to all the hipsters of the East End or celebrity Champagne Socialist sets? I don’t think they’ll run, I think they’ll initially try to ‘help’ – the invaders, but soon hide in their massive Burgle Me! homes.

Based on observation, they might try joining (like the UAF and SWP) to bring about what they imagine to be the End of Capitalism (that’s why they’re doing it, they told me, like an immigration version of Cloward-Piven) but I don’t see that working, it would function like an anti-white pogrom. Practice your NAMALT memes.
“Not all Muslims” will be their retreat song, as they greedily watch those same people beat you down and, they hope, to death.

Begin playing a game of Warrior/Informer. If your country were taken over, who would work with you to take down the system, and would be the snitch? You get uncannily good at spotting the snitches.

“It is easy to confuse Islamists with warriors, given Islam’s violent reputation. My guess is that the rabbits importing these Muslims have done so, and are hoping they have imported a violent army which will subjugate the evil nationalists when the unrest begins.”

They have never fought with their back against the wall. The natives have nothing to lose and the nationalists are fighting for a future. The enemy are nihilist degenerates who live for nothing and believe in nothing, no God will protect them. It’s cold and nobody will fight for that ‘dream’.

They have two obvious weaknesses.
1. They cluster. Weapons were designed for this herd marker. We have narrow roads.
2. They are dependent on the European welfare state. If our version of EBT were shut down by a single patriot in the system, or a single hacker from without, their future jihadi children would starve. Kidnapping the children would also occur, since they’ve done that to ours already. Civil wars are fought with women and especially children, and which group has more of those?

The biggest issue is the disarmament and they do have us on that count.

“If the economic collapse goes down, expect those free resources to be pulled. When they are, there will not be much keeping these migrators from migrating on, is search of safety and security elsewhere.”

Except their primary motivation is sex with white-blonde whores. They think all Western women are the whores they see in porn. Low IQ, what ya gonna do.
The secondary motivation is money, yes. The simplest way to end this invasion, as I’ve mentioned, is to harshly punish rape again. Even the feminists couldn’t complain. Unlike the Barbarians, we can see them coming, hear them coming (the Call to Prayer is LOUD and broadcasts where they are reliably at multiple points throughout the day) and in many cases, smell them coming (acrid off-curry stench, don’t ask). In a dark, enclosed urban environment, utilizing all the senses would be crucial. Their men tend to be lard-arses too. White girls need to learn to run again.

“There will be ISIS fighters who have come to Europe specifically to launch attacks”

As I mentioned, the Paris attackers targeted a Left-wing Socialist area. They knew those places were least defended. We have religious rabbits targeting atheist/hedonist rabbits, that’s why many in Europe have suddenly gone quiet. Their plan literally backfired.

“Hopefully nobody will forget the cowardice and treason of the rabbits, before it is all over.”

Keep reminding them. Everywhere. On the street. In casual conversation. WHO MADE THIS HAPPEN.

I keep telling Germans ‘but you voted for Merkel’. It’s beginning to sink in.

The timing of the EU invasion this year was deliberate, to distract the West from the Christian Genocide in MENA.
It’s a useful rhetorical trick to turn back the SJW’s cry on them.

You’re on the wrong side of history, you should be wearing a hijab.