ironically problematic paper

I’m happy to let them continue down this path, morbidly curious to see what happens.

I mean, I was raised in a socialist schooling system and look how I turned out.

Notice race! But don’t you dare notice race!
Identify as your race! Identify everyone else as their race! Categorise people by their race!
Be colourblind! Never be colourblind! Always notice race!
What does whiteness mean to you? How do you benefit by whiteness? How is your racial identity part of your history?

I mean wow, they are literally recruiting for the trads, aren’t they?

You wanna open the psychological Pandora’s box?

Asking the questions doesn’t mean you get to control their conclusions.

https://oxfordre.com/education/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-5

Isn’t the concept of white ‘privilege‘ arguing for biological white differences?

Isn’t it literally the scientific, given premise of white supremacy? The othering of whites from the species?

The premise of innate, biological and unshakeable is the same.
The intended conclusion alone varies: pride or shame.

Even if you consider surrendering being gifted or special, would any normal human? They try to guilt trip, emotionally abuse and gaslight us into a kind of racial masochism (whether such talent/ability surrender is possible or not) but pathological altruism has strong survival limits.

Recall what happened the last time white people got pissed at another race – Hiroshima

Do you want to wake a sleeping giant? The medieval bloodlust in us hasn’t gone away, it’s suppressed. If you keep bringing it up, well… they assume we won’t change in our behaviour. That’s facile.

And if the problem is white culture, simply vacate white homelands? White people have a right to be white in cultures we founded, that is the builder race’s right. Found your own culture instead of projecting racial parasitism as the issue of the host. Guest right terminates at destructiveness. We needn’t tolerate hostiles any more than furniture should tolerate termites. And false flagging as in-group can only work for so long before even the dullest wake up to it.

It’s like they’re trying to piss us off.

White norms ARE the framework, they ARE the civilization and society, made by the collective genetics. Behavioural genetics is finding increasingly that culture is genetically based. Where white people are, we cannot help but make white culture. So what do they think we could do, other than deport the rogue element that prefers other cultures? That’s the only peaceful solution.

But the goldfish (citizens) would die without the bowl (productive white people) protecting the water (white social structure, civilization and gibs). We have turkeys arguing for Christmas.

The problem with gibs isn’t even the free stuff, it’s the lack of discrimination in why you get it. If you give people money for all behaviours, you encourage vice ones. Gov grants would be fine if they actually helped the little guy, cronies should be hanged. Deterrence must exist or corruption continues. Middle-class corruption is no less a crime, it’s actually a collective mugging. In their metaphor, will the water magically float? If you want to stop relying on white people, simply refuse their tax money, or we’ll never, ever start taking you seriously. If you act as our dependents, we correctly view you as children. Unproductive white leeches get the same treatment e.g. the chav, the grant-chasing academic. They are correctly resentful of their dependent role but THEY chose that, and continue to. We dislike it, we didn’t want it. Nobody wants white man’s burden but should we seek to shake it off, white man’s rejection, also complaints rise there too. They don’t wanna drop the learned helplessness, the convenient incompetence routine. They could just go home if they want to be among their own kin, but if you come to multiculturalism or the American (raceless) republic expecting personal segregation, you must be retarded.

What’s called parallel communities is just a colony.

replace meme text with white identity, from their perspective

wow just wow

Freud! Sexual theory, inversion

http://www.bartleby.com/278/1.html
I think people don’t read Freud because they assume they know what he will say.

Stay tuned for traps, queers, degeneracy and genetic aspersions.

It’s like asking a Communist for a good book on capitalism. Psychodynamics is the natural enemy of postmodernism. Everything you do is loaded with meaning, nothing you say matters. It isn’t perfect but it has use. It digs down into motive, unlike, say, the gay triangle of CBT, where thoughts magically pop out of nowhere ~dynamic unconsciousness screams into the void~

“Degeneration.—This term degeneration is open to the objections which may be urged against the promiscuous use of this word in general. It has in fact become customary to designate all morbid manifestations not of traumatic or infectious origin as degenerative. Indeed, Magnan’s classification of degenerates makes it conceivable that the highest general configuration of nervous accomplishment need not exclude the application of the concept of degeneration. Under the circumstances it is a question what use and what new content the meaning of “degeneration” still possesses. It would seem more appropriate not to speak of degeneration: (1) Where there are not many marked deviations from the normal; (2) where the capabilities and the capacity to exist do not in general appear markedly impaired. 6  15″

Hello, DSM 5.

n.b. The ICD is the DSM only stronger. It’s a huge, honest list of insurance codes. They don’t pretend to care about you, pay the man and take your pills.

A momentary pause for memes that get funnier the more psychodynamics you know.

     

“Degeneration.—This term degeneration is open to the objections which may be urged against the promiscuous use of this word in general. It has in fact become customary to designate all morbid manifestations not of traumatic or infectious origin as degenerative. Indeed, Magnan’s classification of degenerates makes it conceivable that the highest general configuration of nervous accomplishment need not exclude the application of the concept of degeneration. Under the circumstances it is a question what use and what new content the meaning of “degeneration” still possesses. It would seem more appropriate not to speak of degeneration: (1) Where there are not many marked deviations from the normal; (2) where the capabilities and the capacity to exist do not in general appear markedly impaired. 6  15  That the inverted are not degenerates in this qualified sense can be seen from the following facts:  16  1. The inversion is found among persons who otherwise show no marked deviation from the normal.  17  2. It is found also among persons whose capabilities are not disturbed, who on the contrary are distinguished by especially high intellectual development and ethical culture. 7  18  3. If one disregards the patients of one’s own practice and strives to comprehend a wider field of experience, he will in two directions encounter facts which will prevent him from assuming inversions as a degenerative sign.  19  (a) It must be considered that inversion was a frequent manifestation among the ancient nations at the height of their culture. It was an institution endowed with important functions. (b) It is found to be unusually prevalent among savages and primitive races, whereas the term degeneration is generally limited to higher civilization (I. Bloch). Even among the most civilized nations of Europe, climate and race have a most powerful influence on the distribution of, and attitude toward, inversion. 8  20″

Nurture theorists got nothing on this man.

“Innateness.—Only for the first and most extreme class of inverts, as can be imagined, has innateness been claimed, and this from their own assurance that at no time in their life has their sexual impulse followed a different course. The fact of the existence of two other classes, especially of the third, speaks against the assumption of its being congenital. Hence, the propensity of those holding this view to separate the group of absolute inverts from the others results in the abandonment of the general conception of inversion. Accordingly in a number of cases the inversion would be of a congenital character, while in others it might originate from other causes.…..

The Relation of Bisexuality.—Since the time of Frank Lydston, Kiernan, and Chevalier, a new stream of thought has been introduced for the explanation of the possibility of sexual inversion. This contains a new contradiction to the popular belief which assumes that a human being is either a man or a woman.”

Unfortunately, Freud appeared to have predicted all this gender binary business.

“The conception which we gather from this long known anatomical fact is the original predisposition to bisexuality, which in the course of development has changed to monosexuality, leaving slight remnants of the stunted sex.”

Sexuality is fluid down generations. Evolution. No naturalistic fallacy about bonobos here, plz.

“Psychic hermaphroditism would gain in substantiality if parallel with the inversion of the sexual object there should be at least a change in the other psychic qualities, such as in the impulses and distinguishing traits characteristic of the other sex. But such inversion of character can be expected with some regularity only in inverted women; in men the most perfect psychic manliness may be united with the inversion. …”

Lesbian neuroscience testosterone studies. 2D:4D ratios. The homosexual male’s femininity is a parody, a social role. They had no trouble hiding it when it was illegal.

He did write a whole book on Leonardo assuming he was homosexual, the reason moderns assume it, so he may be slightly biased in favour of the male purely because his own mother abandoned him to a nanny. We call this attachment issues in child psychology but it’s essentially Freud Pure.

“The conception which we gather from this long known anatomical fact is the original predisposition to bisexuality, which in the course of development has changed to monosexuality, leaving slight remnants of the stunted sex.”

Kinsey hasn’t got shit on Freud.
~confetti~

“A spokesman of the masculine inverts stated the bisexual theory in its crudest form in the following words: “It is a female brain in a male body.” But we do not know the characteristics of a “female brain.” The substitution of the anatomical for the psychological is as frivolous as it is unjustified. The attempted explanation by v. Krafft-Ebing seems to be more precisely formulated than that of Ulrich but does not essentially differ from it. v. Krafft-Ebing thinks that the bisexual predisposition gives to the individual male and female brain cells as well as somatic sexual organs.”

Sounds epigenetic.

“These centers develop first towards puberty mostly under the influence of the independent sex glands. We can, however, say the same of the male and female “centers” as of the male and female brains; and moreover, we do not even know whether we can assume for the sexual functions separate brain locations (“centers”) such as we may assume for language.  33  After this discussion, two thoughts, as it were, remain; first, that a bisexual predisposition is to be presumed for the inversion also, only we do not know wherein it exists beyond the anatomical formations; and, second, that we are dealing with disturbances which are experienced by the sexual impulse during its development. 11  34  ”

Number of abuse victims studies. Sheer quantity, cannot be ignored.
And have you ever met a gay guy that loves his father?
Fuck you, Dad!” the lifestyle crisis.

Traditionally, all fathers asked of their sons was to produce another heir….

crude compensation or coping mechanism
another thrilling round of-

“The Sexual Object of Inverts.—The theory of psychic hermaphroditism presupposed that the sexual object of the inverted is the reverse of the normal. The inverted man, like the woman, succumbs to the charms emanating from manly qualities of body and mind; he feels himself like a woman and seeks a man.  35  But however true this may be for a great number of inverts it by no means indicates the general character of inversion. There is no doubt that a great part of the male inverted have retained the psychic character of virility, that proportionately they show but little the secondary characters of the other sex, and that they really look for real feminine psychic features in their sexual object. If that were not so it would be incomprehensible why masculine prostitution, in offering itself to inverts, copies in all its exterior, to-day as in antiquity, the dress and attitudes of woman.”

The original ‘are traps gay?’

To round off by repeating one section considering our current knowledge of the microbiome and the possible role of Gay Germ theory.

“It has in fact become customary to designate all morbid manifestations not of traumatic or infectious origin as degenerative. ”

How about you read the thing before taking an SJW’s word for it?

Their definition of homophobia and privilege are also deeply Freudian.

Comic: Antisocial media

antisocialmedia

Fear white people.
Mock white people.

White people are dying and redundant. Whites will be history.
White people are coming back, stronger than ever. There is no such thing as white genocide.

There is no such thing as reverse racism.
There is no such thing as racism against whites.
There is no such thing as white people.
There is such a thing as white privilege.
There is such a thing as white supremacy.
There is no such thing as white supremacy.
There is no such thing as anti-white.
There is no such thing as a white nation.
There is such a thing as white nationalism.

Fuck, writing all that out at once really drives it home, huh?

snort lol laugh haha hmph derision yeah duh really uhuh mhmm princess bride