Video: Criminal rape victim

Justice is dead, isn’t it?

The “feminists” don’t care.

The police and politicians are in on it.

So much for “hate crimes”, isn’t it?

But “age of consent” has nothing to do with rape, you weirdo. They don’t become non-victims aged 16-18, the pedos are pushing it as “underage sex” – no, it’s child rape. We already have a term, don’t use the Marxist rhetoric.

Female medieval English skeletons study

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00766097.2015.1119392

“However, the period of ‘youth’ in medieval England, before the achievement of full social adulthood, may have extended well past physical adolescence, and the age of 25 years is often used as the cut-off point.14″

Louder for the pedos at the back.

“but for most medieval young women physical adulthood did not equate to social adulthood.16″

Obviously.

“Instead, puberty may have marked the beginning of the phase of ‘maidenhood’ rather than adulthood.17”

We now call it teenagehood but I prefer that name for women.

“Lifestyle changes for the teenager, in particular the onset of formal work, may have marked a further step away from childhood, particularly if this involved a move away from the parental home. That the 14th-century poll tax was levied on all those aged 14 years and above suggests that young women were expected to be earning their own money by this age.18

HA. Yeah, the guys who say women should sit at home all day twiddling their thumbs waiting to marry are 1. wrong and 2. have put too much stock in middle-class novelist Austen.

Like today;
“Although exact numbers are impossible to calculate, it is clear from the documentary evidence that a significant proportion of young women migrated to urban centres such as London and York to obtain employment, most commonly a service position.19″

Exactly like today:
“This move would have been a dramatic, and potentially a traumatic, change in lifestyle for young women. Although it may have brought greater freedom and responsibility, it does not seem to have conferred full adult status; there is evidence that young women in service were always viewed as ‘girls’ regardless of their age, just as young men were not viewed as full adults before the completion of an apprenticeship contract.20″

So they didn’t marry for money, they were already economically independent.

If you actually read history and here, forensics.

“in reality, marriage at such a young age was largely restricted to the nobility, with the average age at marriage in the general population estimated at 20–25 years,22
and perhaps even later following the Black Death.23
This would provide a very late age of achievement of ‘adulthood’ by modern standards. However, although marriage was very much the expected path a significant minority of women — perhaps around 15% — never married.24″

Who is dumb enough to have never looked this up?

I keep seeing Americans who make sweeping fictional statements about what ‘we’ Europeans did and it’s like… no. That’s never happened. Citation? Statistics? They are liars. Even in their revenge fantasies of ‘oppressing’ women from work (oh joy, welfare on the backs of random men? can’t win, can we?) then they assume all women would marry off (literally never happened in human history), all women are fertile and their children all magically survive (LOL) and that all men want to marry and got to choose who (LOL no). The economy also needs young workers, part of the immigrant problem is caused by not allowing teens to work.

They’re in bloody La La Land.

Extended maturation is K-selected, the men and women were tougher as a result.

Just realised my grandmothers might be in here.

Almost certainly. Yeah, don’t lie about my nana/s.

“Alongside these dramatic but infrequent events, most young medieval females would have experienced everyday hardships and hazards.”

” The average femoral diaphysis length recorded for the medieval 14-year-old females (354 mm) is closest to that recorded by Maresh for 20th-century 10-year-olds (348 mm). The average figures for medieval 15- and 16-year-old females (365 mm and 366 mm respectively) are still lower than for 20th-century 11-year-olds (367 mm). These data suggest that growth in medieval England fell well below modern standards, perhaps reflecting the lower standard of living medieval children would have experienced.”

If it was that hard on the girls, you don’t wanna go back to that, guys.

“It does not necessarily follow that medieval women were considerably shorter than their modern counterparts. When compared to dental formation, epiphyseal fusion in the female adolescent skeletons from our sample was delayed by two to three years in comparison to modern standards, allowing them to ‘catch-up’ their growth during the pubertal growth spurt.27 This pattern of extended growth appears to have been common in the medieval period;”

The English are tough.

” Only very slight differences in stature were noted between the women of Lincolnshire, London and Gloucester, although the London females had greater diversity in adult height.”

“This may suggest that girls who experienced poorer conditions for childhood and adolescent growth were more likely to die around or before the age of 25 years.”

K-selection. Stunted or shorter women likelier to die. Same with men.

“It has been suggested that female height may have suffered in comparison to male height in medieval Europe due to preferential feeding and care of male children,33causing greater sexual dimorphism in growth and final stature between the sexes. By comparison, the average stature of young men at our sites (156 individuals) was 169.5 cm (5 ft 7 in). This may simply be the result of sexual dimorphism as such comparisons are similar for modern western populations, and therefore does not support the hypothesis that girls experienced poorer nutrition and living standards than boys.”

K-types invest well in all offspring.

“According to these indicators, it appears that all of the individuals studied had entered the pubertal growth spurt by the age of 14 years. In the modern western world girls tend to begin puberty around the age of 10 years,37 and so this result would fit with modern expectations. “

Puberty begins then takes a few years, 14-18/19 matches what I read elsewhere about menarche (posted here).

The ‘modern’ data is skewed by non-whites, especially Asians and Africans, with much lower menarches.

The African is nine, measured in America, as I recall.

“More information can be gained from examining the epiphyseal fusion of the hand phalanges, a process known to occur during the deceleration phase of the pubertal growth spurt, and correlated with first menstruation in modern females. Although the age at which this event occurred varied in our sample just as among modern girls, fusion appears to have occurred most frequently between 15 and 17 years (Fig 2). At 14 years, only 36% of girls display fusing or fused hand phalangeal epiphyses, but by 17 years this figure has risen to 84%.”

Still not 100%, K-types have a later range of menarche.

“A second skeletal event known to be associated with first menstruation, the ossification of the iliac crest of the ilium, was also only found in girls aged at 15 years or over. Interestingly, this is roughly in line with the average age at menarche suggested by the few available documentary sources.38 An average age at menarche of between 15 and 16 years would be much later than the modern British average of just under 13 years.39In addition to their shorter stature, this finding adds weight to the argument that environmental factors such a deficient diet and disease were having a negative impact on medieval female growth and development. Interestingly, however, this average age at menarche is below the age of 17 years recorded for mid-19th century females,40indicating that urban conditions were not as detrimental as those experienced during rapid industrialisation.”

The female body takes YEARS to develop, periods often occur too early to carry a child to term. Hollywood lies, because it’s full of creeps.

Men shouldn’t be discussing a reproductive system they cannot understand.

“The evidence for medieval England, however, shows a delay in the achievement of this milestone, which appears to have fallen between 17 and 18 years for most girls, based on 247 individuals with this bone surviving (Fig 3). Complete fusion of the iliac crest of the ilium, which signals the end of pelvic growth, was only seen in a minority of women aged below 20 years, based on the 277 individuals “

They’re K-types, it isn’t a delay, it’s NORMAL. Modern people are aberrant.

17-18 periods stabilize (this takes years, I have spoken to doctors about it).

The pelvis keeps growing to carry and support a child though, only when this is done (about 21, spinal plate fusion) is the woman actually sexually mature with a low risk of still birth, miscarriage or death.

Modern medicine is allowing a lot of non-white thots to survive a process Nature is telling them is fatal. Do not confuse that with Nature’s approval.

These data suggest that puberty was extended into the very late teens for young medieval women, pushing back the timing of achievement of full physical adulthood. This extended period of physical adolescence indicates that living standards for young medieval women, at least in the urban and small town environments, were considerably poorer than those of modern British adolescents. Some variation between the sites was noted, with pubertal development most advanced in the small town of Barton-upon-Humber, and most delayed in the urban hospital cemetery of St Mary Spital, London. This presumably reflects the harsher living conditions experienced by the girls living and working in London.”

Nah, hard work and low fat diet. Treating the women like men will delay them more.

“It is believed that the demographic changes caused by the Black Death may have led to increased opportunities for many women to migrate and work.43

Although less documentary evidence is available for women than for men, there is evidence for female servants much younger than 12 years in urban households,44and some migration may have occurred at a very young age. Although legislation was passed to regulate the minimum age for apprentices — 13 years in the early 14th century, rising to 16 years by the 15th century — apprenticeships were rarely available for girls, and no such legal minimum age existed for servants or casual workers. The available evidence suggests that girls started formal work away from home at a younger age than boys.45

This concept of female laziness is really American.

” a degree of personal freedom; the latter is perhaps most clearly indicated by the large number of migrant women recorded as making ‘merchet’ payments for the right to choose their own marriage partner.46 On the other hand, moving away from home, particularly to a town or city, could bring with it new challenges and hazards, such as sexual predation, mistreatment, injury and disease.”

Americans are so wrong it hurts.

” this result indicates that much greater numbers of women living and dying in London were actually suffering from tuberculosis.”

“Again, the numbers are too small for statistical analysis, but this may provide further evidence for girls having a more indoor lifestyle than boys in the medieval period.”

Forcing women to sit at home is literally bad for their health.

We aren’t mole people.

On the whole, the women actually had it harder than men.

“There can be little doubt that this extensive workload was exhausting for many women, but osteological study can provide further direct evidence for the impact that this had on young women’s bodies.

A wide range of trauma has been recorded on the skeletons of young medieval women, including fractures of the upper limb and finger bones, cranium and ribs, lower limbs and feet.57 However, the prevalence of fractures of each type is lower than among males, suggesting that girls were exposed to (or exposed themselves to) fewer risks of injury than boys.”

We hadn’t evolved for that labour, men did.

“It is notable that, of the 48 cases of trauma reported in the grey and published literature, cranial, rib and jaw injuries, suggestive of interpersonal violence, only started to appear in women aged 17–25 years, comprising 18.6% of the 43 fractures for this age group. This suggests that the risk of violence rose as girls turned into young women, perhaps reflecting domestic violence after marriage.58″

That would explain the death rate. Stress and fractures – no healthy baby.

There is one area of the skeleton where young women seem to have suffered virtually the same frequency of fractures as young men, the vertebral column. By far the highest prevalence rate for vertebral fractures (4.7%, n = 9) was found at St Mary Spital suggesting that female workers in the capital, or at least the poor workers buried in this hospital cemetery, were undertaking the activities most likely to cause spinal injury. The majority of these fractures were compression fractures, often caused by falls from a height, although avulsion and hyperflexion injuries were also present.59

The men sitting at a desk in an apprenticeship had it easy.

“Schmorl’s nodes are common, often asymptomatic, depressions caused by herniation of the nucleus pulposus on the superior and inferior surfaces of the vertebral bodies. Their aetiology is complex, although spinal trauma caused by vigorous activity and flexion and extension of the spine is most commonly associated with their formation.60 The age of their occurrence is not clear, but they generally appear before the age of 18 years.61Plomp et al argued that males are more susceptible to these lesions due to the size and shape of their vertebrae.62 In our study, medieval women had a higher prevalence of the lesions). Analysis of the location of Schmorl’s nodes on the vertebrae revealed that the lumbar vertebrae were affected far more often among women, and the central thoracic vertebrae among men. This mirrors vertebral fractures where in the women all of the fractures occurred in the lower thoracic and lumbar vertebrae, while in young men the central thoracic vertebrae were affected. This may suggest different activities; strain on the lumbar vertebrae, in particular, may be caused by bending and lifting.63″

aka back breaking labour, which could cause…

“Further evidence for stress being placed on the spines of young medieval women is provided by cases of spondylolysis. This describes the partial separation of the inferior facets on the neural arch from the vertebral body, usually between the ages of 10–12 years. The condition results from microtrauma in low grade stress on the lower back due to bending and lifting strains, or a fall from a height,64 but may have an underlying congenital cause. This injury was present in 4.4% of the female skeletons examined. This is higher than the prevalence of this condition found by the authors among young medieval males (2.9%), although the numbers involved were too small for statistical analysis. Again, the area involved is the lumbar region of the vertebral column. In addition, three young women, two aged at around 21 years and one at 22–25 years, display early degenerative joint disease of the vertebral column.”

Forcing women into labour like that kills them, reminder.

What emerges from the osteological evidence is that the workload of many young medieval women appears to have been literally backbreaking, and these early injuries may be expected to have led to significant back problems and pain in later life. It seems likely that these early spinal problems were caused primarily by carrying heavy loads at a time when the spine was still forming and vulnerable. Research from the grey and published literature reveals that rates of spinal injury were higher in urban than rural women65 and suggests that the workload of the young migrant women in service was harder than that of the young women who remained in the country or in small towns with their families. For example, the prevalence of vertebral fractures, spondylolysis and Schmorl’s nodes was lowest at Barton-upon-Humber, a wealthy small town.66″

Marriage, Sexual Activity and Childbirth

There is considerable evidence to suggest that marriage was a defining moment in the medieval female life course, marking the transition into true social adulthood.67 It is notable, however, that there was a significant gap between the legal age at marriage (12 years) and the average age at marriage (20–25 years even before the Black Death) in medieval England.68 The new analysis of pubertal development in medieval England discussed above suggests that the average age at menarche was 15–16 years. Full fertility, in terms of the likelihood of conception, carrying a healthy pregnancy to term and surviving childbirth, would only have followed several years after menarche with the completion of pelvic growth,69 which in our medieval sample appears to have been rare before the age of 19 years.

aka what I already typed, dammit

The fact that many young medieval women would not have been fertile before their 20s may be one reason for the relatively late average age of marriage during this period.70 It also suggests that marriage at the legal minimum age of 12 years would rarely have been fruitful, and any pregnancy that did ensue would have carried significant risks for the mother. We know of several medieval legal cases of the marriage of young girls where the ‘physical readiness for marriage’ of the girl in question was debated.71

This don’t go to college because you get periods thing from America is pig ignorant on female anatomy.

There is evidence to suggest, however, that the majority of cases of marriage before 15 years were confined to the nobility.72Today, girls of higher socio-economic status, with a considerably better standard of life, mature earlier than average. For example, high caste girls in 20th-century India have an average age at menarche over a year younger than low caste girls.73 The average age at menarche for noble girls in medieval England may therefore have been younger than the average age of 15–16 years described above.

more r-selected by men, explains eventual decadence and homosexuality rates, especially in the French

Even so, a pregnancy before the completion of pelvic development would have been dangerous; a famous example of this is provided by Margaret Beaufort, who appears to have been rendered sterile by a difficult first birth (of the future king Henry VII) at the age of just 13 years.74 An understanding of these risks is demonstrated by several contemporary authors,75 and was reflected in the Jewish rule that contraception (banned by Christian teaching) could be used to prevent pregnancy if the bride were too young to safely bear a child.767

The guys trying to force women to reproduce young would ironically render their own wife sterile via their stupidity. Good riddance. The Lord works in mysterious ways.

In theory, marriage coincided with sexual initiation for young women, and if the Church’s remonstrations to remain celibate until marriage were universally followed, it would indicate a relatively late age of sexual initiation. In reality, premarital sex among betrothed couples seems to have been common,77

that links to this study, no, they weren’t slutty

seems*

no

and sex with other partners, in not all cases consensual, was far from rare.

Are you really counting rape?

Evidence for this is provided by the erratic enforcement of ‘legerwite’ or ‘leyrwite’ fines on serf women who engaged in premarital sex.78

What about the men.

Premarital sex is thought to have been particularly common among young girls and women living away from home, for example in service roles, due to the greater freedom and availability of partners as well as the risk of sexual predation or pimping from employers.79 The sexual exploitation of girls in service appears to have been a frequent problem based on the legal record,80 and many young women must have lost their virginity in these circumstances. The extensive focus of many writers on admonishing young women to stay celibate until marriage may be taken as further evidence that premarital sex was seen (at least for women) as a significant societal problem.

Rape isn’t sleeping around, WTF.

Pedophiles raping virgins don’t really count as premarital sex, a choice, does it?

Two aspects of osteological analysis may shed light on sexual activity among young medieval women. The first is a sexually transmitted disease. Venereal syphilis, a treponemal disease, affects the skeleton in its tertiary stage, causing distinctive skeletal lesions.81 From the end of the 15th century, syphilis is believed to have been endemic in urban areas of England, although recent work has suggested that it may have been present at a much earlier date.82

Men spread that, sailors caught that. Your point?

If a virgin woman married a man with it, she’d get it. That can happen after marriage.

These female authors really want to present all women throughout history as sluts. Cui bono?

Among the 14–25 year old female individuals examined, four probable cases of treponemal disease were recorded, based on the presence of characteristic gummatous lesions in the cranium or long bones.83 Three of these were found in the young women from London (Fig 5), and one was found in York, at St Helen-on-the-Walls. One further case is known from Blackfriars, Gloucester;84 no cases were identified in the rural or small town sites consulted in the wider survey. The two youngest women to show signs of treponemal disease were aged at just 16 years. It is difficult to rule out congenital syphilis in these cases, as the presentation of the two conditions can be very similar, although none of these skeletons display the typical dental deformations of congenital syphilis.

So their fathers were sluts, so?

If the disease is the venereal form of treponemal disease, or syphilis, this would suggest the girls were very young when first infected. Syphilis generally takes several years to cause such destruction in the skeleton.85 Although the number of cases recorded is small, given that only 10–20% of individuals with tertiary syphilis experience skeletal involvement, and that skeletal lesions take several years to develop,86 it seems likely that much greater numbers of young women were affected by this disease.

To imply they wanted to be raped by syphilitic men is a bridge too far though.

The spread of sexually transmitted diseases such as syphilis was exacerbated by the problem of prostitution in medieval towns and cities. Karras argues that regulations of the Guilds limited women’s access to the normal labour market, forcing them to turn to prostitution out of necessity.87

Assuming that was a mistake.

There is little direct evidence that apprentices were procured as prostitutes, but one extant record from London City and Ecclesiastical Court (ad 1423) attests that one Alison Boston took apprentices who she hired out for the ‘horrible vice of lechery’.88 There are also accounts of men taking young girls (invenculae) to the London stews and selling them as prostitutes, suggesting the types of danger faced by young unskilled immigrant women. Goldberg89 cites the famous references from medieval York in ad 1482 that place prostitutes within the legal realm of ‘lepers’ and pigs in the hazards they caused for the local population.

Enslaved children.

She does not discuss the age at which women may have turned to prostitution, but suggests widows and daughters of labourers, known as ‘spinsters’ and ‘seamstresses’ (sempsters), needed to work several jobs to make ends meet, including petty theft, illegal ale retailing and prostitution. Goldberg argues that although full-time, ‘professional’ prostitutes were rare, many women were forced into occasional prostitution in hard times.90

Contradiction, Goldberg.

also why we have the welfare state

This would have been a particular risk for a migrant girl away from the safety of her family.91 Although it is impossible to state that any of the young medieval women examined were forced into this profession, this must be considered in the cases where possible syphilis is recorded.

No shit, nobody would choose that. The excuses these women make for rape are appalling.

A second consequence of sexual activity, pregnancy, may also in exceptional circumstances be visible in the archaeological record. In total, eight cases of young women buried with fetuses in utero have been recorded from medieval cemetery contexts. These burials represent ‘obstetric catastrophes’ with the death of both mother and child in late pregnancy or childbirth. Although there was a Christian injunction in place in medieval England for infants to be removed from their mother’s womb before burial,92 this does not appear to have been rigorously obeyed.

Yeah, who wouldn’t choose to die like that? I guess they were all just happy sluts, huh Mizz Feminist?

All of the individuals buried with a fetus in utero in medieval cemeteries have an estimated age at death of around 20 years or over, and thus none represent particularly young ‘teenage’ pregnancies.

Because they rarely got pregnant. Look at the evidence.

This may support the idea that in the medieval period teenage girls were not falling pregnant, as first pregnancies are often seen as the most hazardous.93

May? It’s anatomical.

It also fits with the known late pattern of marriage in this society. However, it is by no means certain that all of these women were married. The two examples from St Mary Spital may have represented extramarital pregnancies as the hospital was known to accept unmarried women in pregnancy or childbirth.94 It may be significant that neither of these women received an individual grave or any grave ornamentation. In contrast, the elaborate nature of one young mother’s burial at Barton-upon-Humber, in a coffin within the church and with a cloth of gold artefact,95 surely indicates that this woman was married and held a position of substantial social standing.

Clearly, their situation was a choice.

Given the high mortality rate of women in childbirth in the medieval period revealed by documentary sources,96s it is clear that these rare burials represent a dramatic under-estimation of the real levels of maternal mortality. In many cases, the churches prohibition on burying fetuses in utero may have been observed. In a large proportion of births, too, the child may have been saved, leaving little clue as to the cause of death of the mother.

But doctors (when sane) will elect to save the mother because she can have countless children later but an orphan baby is already financially a goner. Remember this, America.

Conclusion

The period of social adolescence for young medieval women seems to have been an important life stage, encompassing the growth to full physical adulthood and fertility, the adoption of adult working roles and, for most young women, the move from legal dependence on a father to legal dependence on a husband, with perhaps a few brief years of relative independence in between. The comparative absence of young women from documentary sources means that osteological information plays a vital role in our understanding of this group, and it can reveal a great deal about the way in which medieval girls grew into women, the living conditions they enjoyed or endured, the work they did and the health problems they faced.

Many of the conclusions drawn from osteological analysis of this group articulate with and illuminate the documentary evidence. The average age at which full fertility appears to have been achieved, around 20 years, is substantially later than in modern England, but ties in well with the known average age at marriage in this society. The greater susceptibility of young women to respiratory infections, from the relatively benign maxillary sinusitis to the deadly serious tuberculosis, chimes with the picture drawn from documentary sources of an indoor lifestyle for women, close to the smoky fire, and of the cramped living conditions that helped to spread disease. The backbreaking work clearly undertaken by many young women paints a clearer physical picture of their daily lives than that provided by documentary sources alone, and the development of signs of venereal disease in very young women hints at the problem of girls being driven to prostitution in England’s medieval cities.

Gang rape, we still have it. They are driven to it, slave-driven.

Pedos self-expose eventually

They have a Common Purpose.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/462604/We-can-t-prove-sex-with-children-does-them-harm-says-Labour-linked-NCCL

Apparently decades of observed mental illness, substance abuse, attachment disorder, later divorce, the cycle of abuse with their own children, trauma including PTSD and high suicide rates don’t count as ‘harm’.

Apparently they need to spontaneously combust.

in context

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jul/11/labour-bought-data-on-more-than-1m-mums-and-their-children-emmas-diary

that one went down the memory-hole… put it back

https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/politics/outrage-as-yorkshire-vicar-calls-lgbti-lessons-state-sponsored-child-abuse-1-9812091

Rapist nanny state, called it.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/06/01/one-cult-to-rule-them-all-one-cult-to-find-them/

Sex Ed is grooming, people. Sexualisation of minors is grooming.

In full, top article:

“PIE members were lobbying NCCL officials for the age of consent to be reduced and campaigning for “paedophile love”.

reduced to zero

campaign for sweetest spot on a stake

Their view that children were not harmed by having sex with adults appears to have been adopted by those at the top of the civil liberties group.

Today we publish extracts from an NCCL report written for the Criminal Law Revision Committee in 1976 when Mrs Hewitt was general secretary.

It says: “Where both partners are aged 10 or over, but under 14, a consenting sexual act should not be an offence. As the age of consent is arbitrary, we propose an overlap of two years on either side of 14.

They’re already prosecuting like this in cases by the CPS.
Minors can’t cry rape because their rapist is claiming willing.

And gets away with it. Look at the law.

Sick world.

‘Rape gangs’ are actually sex slave owners. It’s slavery.

(Pedo rings are just one form of sex slavery.)

Actually, consent documents would be a good idea but it’s called a marriage certificate.

‘Consent’ is a will o’ wisp for predators.

“Childhood sexual experiences, willingly engaged in, with an adult result in no identifiable damage.

“The Criminal Law Commission should be prepared to accept the evidence from follow-up research on child ‘victims’ which show there is little subsequent effect after a child has been ‘molested’.

Gaslighting, victim blaming.

“The real need is a change in the attitude which assumes that all cases of paedophilia result in lasting damage.

Sexual predator says its teeth aren’t sharp.

“The present legal penalties are too high and reinforce the misinformation and prejudice. The duty of the court should be to inquire into all the relevant circumstances with the intention, not of meting out severe punishment, but of determining the best solution in the interests of both child and paedophile.”

Justice is dead.

Mrs Hewitt, 65, was general secretary between 1974 and 1983. After days of intense pressure, the former Labour MP for Leicester West finally admitted last week the NCCL was “naive and wrong” over its ties to PIE.

Sure. Save the hive.

She said: “Any suggestion that I supported or condoned the vile crimes of child abusers is completely untrue.

Er….

“As the NCCL archives demonstrate, I consistently distinguished between consenting relationships between homosexual men, on the one hand, and the abuse of children on the other.

men, not minors

and plenty of men are raped regardless

“When Jack Dromey, as NCCL chairman in 1976, vigorously opposed PIE at the NCCL AGM, he did so with the full support of the executive committee and myself as general secretary.”

However Labour MP Dromey’s opposition to PIE has been questioned by its former chairman, convicted paedophile Tom O’Carroll, who claims he felt “welcome” at NCCL meetings where he sat on the gay rights sub-committee.

Now they’re teaching it in primary schools!

Step by step instruction.

Mr O’Carroll said: “While they did not like PIE and did nothing to support our objectives, they were afraid of appearing insufficiently ‘right on’.

Thought Prison: “Effectiveness is irrelevant: for political correctness abstract and altruistic allocation is intrinsically superior to human agency; it is therefore morally necessary to replace individual freedom with systemic coercion, regardless of the consequences.”

Coercion vitiates consent. We, the People, do not consent.

“Consequently they were nothing like as strenuous and public in their efforts to distance themselves from PIE as they are now claiming.

“Dromey is quoted as saying ‘I was at the forefront of repeated public condemnations of PIE and their despicable views’. That’s news to me. Maybe by ‘public’ he meant imprecations muttered to cronies at his local pub.”

Dromey’s wife Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour party, was legal officer at the NCCL between 1978 and 1982. She has expressed her “regret” over the NCCL’s involvement with PIE but has pointedly declined to apologise.”

Bring back hanging when?

We need a referendum on how to deal with paedophiles.

*scroll*
COMMENTS UNAVAILABLE

I could think of a few.

Christians cannot support organ ‘donation’

They should push for organs to be lab-grown, which has no strings, but isn’t “free” for the hospitals.
At least in the 18th century, doctors waited until you’d been buried before cutting you up for the socialist “common good”.

Brain-dead doesn’t exist, it’s a guess, like brain “damage”.

It’s odd Americans will fuss about unborn babies but totally ignore ritual butchery of alive adults and children.

You are most vulnerable in hospitals, why did the oldest of the elderly avoid them so? How did they become so old?

The vultures even pressure parents of children with brain conditions with spiritualist New Age nonsense about “living on”. That’s abusive. You know the way they can live on? Not to murder them like yanking carrots out of a garden plot. Physicalism is a cancer, it flouts every religious system, which advises NOT to disjoint the body parts. It is anti-religion and threatens or shames people with religion (who believe in a soul).

The body can’t be “put out” if it’s “donating” and why would they waste pain relief on someone they claim cannot feel?

Bear in mind, neuroscience has proven alternate states of consciousness. Simple EEGs are not done.

Interestingly, if you ask to see the donor cards of a vulture saying what others should do, they don’t have one or it’s a convincing replica.

Then there’s memory transfer, some heart cells in particular have been known to act like neurons. They won’t research why because the families won’t give away the memories (Egyptian soul) of their relatives.

Yah…. cos THAT’s the point where it becomes evil, right?

Not that you’re betraying your relative or spouse to psychopaths too tight to pay laboratories for clean specimens with far higher success rates (more hospital trips and complications, they make even more money).

Two doctors can “declare” you brain-dead as you sit there reading this, grab the rib crackers (don’t look them up) and cut out your still-beating heart for someone THEY deem more worthy to live than you… and that’s legally kosher.

Legal, but not moral.

The SJWs willing to trust any shrink will probably meet that fate.

Declare =/= Prove

How to prove a negative?

The propaganda is heavily anecdotal, one-sided, emotional and vaguely fascist e.g. the government owns your organs.
https://www.kidneycareuk.org/news-and-campaigns/news/organ-donation-bill-passes-final-stage-house-lords/

Oh, openly fascist now apparently.
https://www.parliament.uk/business/news/2019/march/royal-assent-organ-donation-deemed-consent-bill-signed-into-law/

This Bill, presented by Mr Geoffrey Robinson, will allow for consent to organ donation in England to be deemed to have been given by a potential adult organ donor before their death unless they have expressly stated that they did not wish to be an organ donor or an exception applies.

I’m sure “lost paperwork” won’t be a factor if your organs happen to be pristine.

Mistakes won’t be made.

You can’t sue to get the organs back, I presume?

And what about a surplus? They sell them. The family see no money.

This is often referred to as an “opt-out” system of consent as people may “opt-out” of becoming an organ donor on the premise that they do not consent.

Organ rape.

You cannot assume consent.

Libertarians are weak.

Objectification, humanity butchered to view us as meat. Everyone just lost their human rights, their property right to their body, and they’re so idiotic they celebrate?

At which age are you assumed to consent to being cut up like a hog?

The lamb praising the slaughter.

The Nazis weren’t this bad, how’s a baby to vouch non-consent? They ‘allow’ those donations. Placentas are stolen.

The NHS already promises you ‘first dibs’ on organs if you donate one yourself. This is evil.

You don’t need to go to Asia to be robbed of a kidney. Anyone thinking this is ‘nice’ can give their liver to the chavs down the road now.

Each according to his need, morons.

Old people aren’t informed, nobody got a letter about this. They’re just saying they can gut you.

The brain is the final organ to die. Hearing goes last.

Remember, the doctors are just following orders.

They brought this in because families kept saying No.

The Nazis were great humanitarians, they “harvested” so many organs.

“Fascism is capitalism in decay.” – Lenin

Right not to see degeneracy

We have one.

Cinemas still have age-restrictions, this is no different.

Sites like google put porn in totally innocent homework searches.

Child porn addicts:
In the UK, PornHub was the 35th most visited website for children ages 6 to 14 in 2013.
Children and Parents: Media Use and Attitudes Report (2014, October) (p. 232).

ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/media-literacy/media-use-attitudes-14/Childrens_2014_Report.pdf

Dead link now, weird that.

Check yourbrainonporn.com for addiction and neuroscience information.

Child locks on ISPs have always existed, nothing is banned. The UK shouldn’t be producing this stuff. America won’t stop.

What would they say if children were smoking? They used to.

Let’s go back to this bullshit because Sargon doesn’t want to verify his age at the off-license ONE TIME.

You do that every single time you want to drink or smoke but this is clearly a bridge too far for the responsible lefty adults with muh freedoms.

Don’t BOTHER bringing up the fact this policy will cease enabling child addicts.

Don’t even BOTHER. Because you checked, right? You know?

And the clear social message? Yeah, what deterrent? This degeneracy should be underground, I don’t wanna see that. What about my rights? Children shouldn’t be able to view things online they cannot also legally view in person. They can’t go to strip clubs or BDSM shows, they shouldn’t be able to attend virtually.

I love how libertarians assume most people in society are degenerates. No.

Kids are also grooming one another on school wifis and encouraged to groom more kids in a cycle of abuse by adult pedos. It happens.

The latest report:
https://www.ofcom.org.uk/research-and-data/media-literacy-research/childrens/children-and-parents-media-use-and-attitudes-report-2018
They don’t really look into it, weirdly.

“Around one in five 12-15s (22%) who opted to answer the question said they had been contacted
online by someone they didn’t know, and one in ten (9%) said they had seen something of a sexual
nature that made them feel uncomfortable, either online or on their mobile phone.”

Mentally scarring a pre-schooler (other studies asked younger) is nothing to mildly inconveniencing Sargon one bloody time.

If you wonder why soaps and TV are so bad, we removed restrictions on theatre, film and TV for (((no reason))). Covered that UK theatrical statute before, there’s a right not to see this shit. Or at least be warned, which current numerical guidelines do not (I want warning of full nudity and specific acts before paying to see it, as consumer choice).

There’s no such thing as a hooker, Sargon*, that’s what Rotherham social workers say when women and little girls are raped. The psychiatric outcomes of prostitutes have also been studied, there is no excuse for this with Muh Consent because consensus morality doesn’t exist, that’s moral relativist bullshit. Humans don’t have owners, even if you call it a ‘pimp’. Neither is a profession, sex slave owner or sex slave. It’s an affront to human dignity (illegal under the human rights you claim to know and love).

Filming it doesn’t make the situation acceptable, it’s up there with the theatre’s constant abuse of ‘nudity’ scenes**. If adult people wanted to put that adult material online, they’d do it for free! But why do the prostitution/white slavery rings want children to be able to view it?

It’s a good question, innit?

To groom the next crop of recruits. Children have no context to understand, dismiss or deny adult themes. Bobo dolls. They lack the brain development to question what they see, consider it normal and COPY IT.

*(who’s currently triggered at the prospect of protecting children from Silicon Valley pedos and protecting non-addicts by default)

**Apparently public nudity is illegal unless you’re charging and on a stage. WTF. That’s prostitution. This is why we censored productions. It isn’t art. We censor plenty of ‘art’.

other related info copied from

Sources, links and further reading: Rockefeller Foundation and Kinseyhttps://rockfound.rockarch.org/kinsey-reports This Is Why I Quit Porn https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljBZ0_iNqrs&feature=youtu.be The Jewish Role in the Porn Industry https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwd_Iofr6ZQ Porn Sites Get More Visitors Each Month Than Netflix, Amazon And Twitter Combined (Dec 2017) https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/03/internet-porn-stats_n_3187682.html Pornhub wants to be your one-stop shop for sex ed (Feb 2017)http://college.usatoday.com/2017/02/02/pornhub-sex-ed/ Internet pornography by the numbers; a significant threat to society https://www.webroot.com/us/en/home/resources/tips/digital-family-life/internet-pornography-by-the-numbers How Does The Porn Industry Actually Make Money Today? AUGUST 11, 2017 https://fightthenewdrug.org/how-does-the-porn-industry-actually-make-money-today/ How the Internet Changed Porn September 12, 2017 https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/features/how-the-internet-changed-porn-w502441 Three in Traci Lords Sex Film Case Indicted, March 06, 1987 :http://articles.latimes.com/1987-03-06/local/me-5028_1_traci-lords Sugar and Spice and all things not so nice Garry Gross, Richard Prince and the story behind the Brooke Shields photograph (Oct. 2009) https://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/2009/oct/03/brooke-shields-nude-child-photograph Manwin Says Its Porn Business Is Legal Mar. 18, 2013 –https://video.foxbusiness.com/v/2235795190001/?#sp=show-clips Manwin takes over Playboy TV operations October 31, 2011 https://web.archive.org/web/20131203003713/http://www.broadbandtvnews.com/2011/10/31/manwin-takes-over-playboy-tv-operations/ 7 of the most famous Jews in porn By Gabe Friedman June 12, 2015 https://www.jta.org/2015/06/12/news-opinion/the-telegraph/7-of-the-most-famous-jews-in-porn Nathan Abrams on Jews in the American porn industry https://www.jewishquarterly.org/issuearchive/articled325.html?articleid=38 Men’s testosterone levels declined in last 20 years https://uk.reuters.com/article/health-testosterone-levels-dc/mens-testosterone-levels-declined-in-last-20-years-idUKKIM16976320061031 A Population-Level Decline in Serum Testosterone Levels in American Men, January 2007 http://jcem.endojournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/92/1/196 Research related to women working in various aspect of the sex industry http://iamatreasure.com/about/stats/Pornography Stats 2013 (PDF) http://blog.clinicalcareconsultants.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/porn_stats_2013_covenant_eyes.pdf Sex, Lies And Statistics (Nov 2005) https://www.forbes.com/2005/11/22/internet-pornography-children-cz_sl_1123internet.html#6522094a51ba Want to Stop Sex Trafficking? Look to America’s Porn Addiction https://www.huffingtonpost.com/johnhenry-westen/want-to-stop-sex-traffick_b_6563338.html Why Consuming Porn Is An Escalating Behavior August 2017: https://fightthenewdrug.org/why-consuming-porn-is-an-escalating-behavior/ When a person is sexually aroused, it builds new brain maps for both what they think is sexy and what they expect from their partner.”James G. Pfaus, “Who, What, Where, When (and Maybe Even Why)? How the Experience of Sexual Reward Connects Sexual Desire, Preference, and Performance,” Archives of Sexual Behavior 41 (2012): 31–62. When adolescents, both male and female, are exposed to sexualized media, they are more likely to have stronger notions of women being sex objects. L. Monique Ward and Kimberly Friedman, “Using TV as a Guide: Associations Between Television Viewing and Adolescents’ Sexual Attitudes and Behavior,” Journal of Research on Adolescents 16, no. 1 (2006): 133-156. Endocrine response to masturbation-induced orgasm in healthy men following a 3-week sexual abstinence. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11760788 In the UK, PornHub was the 35th most visited website for children ages 6 to 14 in 2013. Children and Parents: Media Use and Attitudes Report (2014, October) (p. 232). http://stakeholders. ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/media-literacy/media-use- attitudes-14/Childrens_2014_Report.pdf.  Donna M. Hughes, “Sex Trafficking of Women for the Production of Pornography,” Citizens Against Trafficking (July 1, 2010), “If a trafficking victim is forced to engage in a sex act that is filmed or photographed for sale as pornography, then the production of pornography itself becomes a severe form of trafficking in persons that is subject to criminal liability.” Robert W. Peters, Laura J. Lederer, and Shane Kelly, “The Slave and the Porn Star: Sexual Trafficking and Pornography,” The Protection Project: Journal of Human Rights and Civil Society, Issue 5 (Johns Hopkins University: Fall 2012). The Porn Myth: Exposing the Reality Behind the Fantasy of Pornography (March 2017): https://www.amazon.com/Porn-Myth-Exposing-Reality-Pornography/dp/162164006X

Nurture theories clearly demonstrate that porn is propaganda. It changes the otherwise healthy way you view women, family, babymaking into Hollywood’s push for resentful soullessness. Why don’t Americans wanna breed anymore?

Brain damage during a closing window of critical biological development is abuse. If we let Google groom kids, we’re enabling child abuse. There’s no such thing as a free lunch or free porn. We know addiction operates by escalation, including, ironically, to watching child porn. What about other kids watching it, viewing the rape and molestation of other kids?

Nothing else permanently alters the brain like viewing sexual content. Even Peterson had to point this out.

It seems to be ruining T-levels in men but propping up Viagra sales! Great for the Israeli companies making it.

It’s the ultimate r-selection tool. I have a right not to be exposed by default, same with not tuning into the radio with the BBC blasting crappy rap songs, same with not attending strip clubs and massage brothels, same with public nudity being illegal because the public doesn’t wanna see it and same thing with needing to consent to pay and prove age to buy a cinema ticket to view what’s effectively a gradual push of softcore porn into even PG kid’s films.

Link: Common trafficking tactics, job bait

Men and women are trafficked everyday.

There should be warning about this in schools.

https://theamericangenius.com/business-news/human-sex-trafficking-job-scams/

Schools practically deliver them by saying things like ‘follow every opportunity!’ and ‘don’t upset the interviewer’!

There should be hierarchy in legitimate work, yes, but not a huge difference in the balance of power.

This isn’t master/slave.

That only encourages (currently Boomer) elders to abuse their position.

Men also become targets for sexual harassment, serial bullies etc.

Your boss isn’t your parent. Nagging is unacceptable.

Human slavery would be nigh impossible without “libertarians” talking about prostitution as a right (it isn’t, that’s a fundamentally dishonest* spin on what a right is**).

What they don’t mention is that many of them have mental problems (so much for consenting adults), drug problems (force/blackmail, memory issues) and in American brothels the hookers are locked in and cannot leave.

Yes, the average household dog has more freedom. There’s no such thing as prostitution, only slavery. It is institutionalized rape of white men, children and women.

“But if they want it…”

Stockholm Syndrome, no.

The amount of gaslighting alone, combined with drugs, means no human would be capable of thinking clearly.

Remember MKUltra, humans are malleable mentally.

*in bad faith

**As a ‘service’,  it involves the market and by that logic, there’s also a market for bestiality, necrophilia and pedophilia. Market doesn’t make right.

If you want to finger the true cause of American degeneracy, it’s “Israel is our greatest ally, let your daughter become a hooker” libertarianism.

Think that’s a non sequitur?

And who sells her the pharmaceuticals to do it?

Concern about white rape is funny

He was saying rape gangs, you classist bigots.

I was going to put white slavery but most people probably don’t know that slavery is primarily sexual.

To this day.

Notice they never try it on with middle-class girls.

They know they wouldn’t get away with it.

“these girls say they were” the judges forced to prosecute don’t believe them, consent should be age of majority and never presumed but then the pedo politicians wouldn’t have a cover either.

And why are they given special treatment on religious grounds in prison?

What if their religion were the anti-prison platoon? It’s absurd.

The point of prison is you have no control. And don’t put them all in one block. That’s a freedom of association.

This is slavery. Call them what they are: white slavery rings.

The only way to deter these predators is bringing back hanging.

The majority wants this. It was taken off the books illegally, without a vote.

Twice they crashed the Parliamentary petition website on that issue shortly after it went up.

It’s the most pertinent solution to people who should not be allowed out.

Sympathy for the victim, not the predator.

Unless of course, the girls and women are finally allowed their right to self-defense? Battered wife syndrome for slaves? Don’t attack someone without expecting them to attack back. First World logic.

It’s like the men who stupidly slap a woman on the arse and object when she slaps them on the face. Well, you started it. If a man did it to them, they’d escalate to a punch, minimum.

We probably need a return of etiquette laws. Hell, just enforcing harassment and stalking law.

These monsters were allowed around these girls. Like leaving that goat in Jurassic Park.

Prosecute the aiders and abetters just as severely. Name, shame, face in the paper.

Of course, the surest way to trigger a Muslim slut is to call them a slut.

They think nobody would dare. Just describe them. Narcissists are easy to trigger.

Also, let the wife leave them for “adultery”.

The rape culture is imported.

It’s low IQ so fixing it is not an option. Deport or hang.

We did this with our native rapists for centuries and it’s the reason they’re so low prevalence nowadays, the DNA was largely wiped out. White nation safety didn’t just happen, it took a lot of rope.

People forget, and then we need to begin again.

We can’t enjoy it any longer because people who want to destroy us invited the snakes in.

Start with the schools.

Why are taxpayers funding any religious schools or religion taught IN schools?

No religious teachings should go through the state. This is preaching.

Ban RE. It’s an abuse of human rights.

It has no place in a school’s compulsory curriculum, it’s too complicated and there are too many religions to teach below a university level.

Freedom from religion is a freedom too.

(Even atheistkult can get behind this).

Jan Matthys, more r than Marx

https://mises.org/library/messianic-communism-protestant-reformation

This is so r-selected it’s staggering.


A guy shows up and says property should be abolished, he should be treated like a King though, and women should be forced into marriage with violent adulterers (bigamists) who wanted a ‘legal’ form of Red Army rape because something something ‘love’.

The cage the monstrous leaders’ corpses were kept in is still up in Munster, good riddance.

“Soon Jan Matthys himself arrived, a tall, gaunt man with a long black beard. Matthys, aided by Bockelson, quickly became the virtual dictator of the town. The coercive Anabaptists had at last seized a city. The Great Communist Experiment could now begin.”

Anti-white mob.

“Matthys called therefore for the execution of all remaining Catholics and Lutherans, but Knipperdollinck’s cooler head prevailed, since he warned Matthys that slaughtering all other Christians than themselves might cause the rest of the world to become edgy, and they might all come and crush the New Jerusalem in its cradle.

Cowards.

It was therefore decided to do the next best thing, and on February 27 the Catholic and Lutherans were driven out of the city, in the midst of a horrendous snowstorm.

Ah! The Russian method.

In a deed prefiguring communist Cambodia, all non-Anabaptists, including old people, invalids, babies and pregnant women were driven into the snowstorm,

Socialists do care – about themselves.
The grasshopper should’ve been left to starve in the story.

and all were forced to leave behind all their money, property, food and clothing. The remaining Lutherans and Catholics were compulsorily rebaptized, and all refusing this ministration were put to death.”

I think we’ll have to bring this back, the cage method.
You can see they deserved it.

“With every person drafted for siege work, Jan Matthys launched his totalitarian communist social revolution.
The first step was to confiscate the property of the expelled. All their worldly goods were placed in central depots, and the poor were encouraged to take “according to their needs,” the “needs” to be interpreted by seven appointed “deacons” chosen by Matthys.”

Bloody Communists.

“When a blacksmith protested at these measures imposed by Dutch foreigners, Matthys arrested the courageous smithy. Summoning the entire population of the town, Matthys personally stabbed, shot, and killed the “godless” blacksmith”

Foreigners with a sense of entitlement.

Thank god we learned our lesson.

Multiculturalism is just a slow invasion.

“A key part of the Anabaptist reign of terror in Münster was now unveiled. Unerringly, just as in the case of the Cambodian communists four-and-a-half centuries later, the new ruling elite realized that the abolition of the private ownership of money would reduce the population to total slavish dependence on the men of power. And so Matthys, Rothmann and others launched a propaganda campaign that it was unchristian to own money privately; that all money should be held in “common,” which in practice meant that all money whatsoever must be handed over to Matthys and his ruling clique.”

Banks, we call them banks.

Strangely, they are run by a religion. Must be a coincidence.

Food was confiscated from private homes, and rationed according to the will of the government deacons. Also, to accommodate the immigrants, all private homes were effectively communized, with everyone permitted to quarter themselves anywhere; it was now illegal to close, let alone lock, doors.

No such thing as burglary.

Communal dining-halls were established, where people ate together to readings from the Old Testament.
This compulsory communism and reign of terror was carried out in the name of community and Christian “love.””

White Sharia has already happened. For similar, low IQ reasons, it also failed.

There’s a reason nobody trusts missionaries.
They’re invaders holding a book, that isn’t better.

As you can see, it’s often much worse.

“All this communization was considered the first giant steps toward total egalitarian communism, where, as Rothmann put it, “all things were to be in common, there was to be no private property and nobody was to do any more work, but simply trust in God.” The workless part, of course, somehow never arrived.”

(((Wow))) imagine my shock. And iPhones would rain from the Heavens!

Even they opposed usury, though. Con artists recognize con artists.

1534:
“everything which offends against love – all such things are abolished amongst us by the power of love and community.”

Anyone who tries to sell you on giving them power over you for weasel words like ‘love’ and ‘community’ is a dictator waiting to happen.
Tolerance is a sin, the Bible never tells you to tolerate evil, quite the opposite.
Outlawing “working for money” is intended to increase dependence.


https://biblehub.com/2_thessalonians/3-10.htm
Like unpaid internships and universal basic income today (and the welfare cliff).
Contrary to the God helps those who help themselves logic of the Bible, which didn’t see money as evil, merely love of it and greed at the expense of rights. Making tax-collectors and bankers Satan?

“For the Anabaptists boasted of their lack of education, and claimed that it was the unlearned and the unwashed who would be the elect of the world.”
“Early in May, Bockelson caught the attention of the town by running naked through the streets in a frenzy, falling then into a silent three-day ecstasy.”

Oh, to see that amygdala. Then the other immigrant friend takes over after Jan.
The first sexual revolution / religious rape / free love fest:

The elders were now given total authority over the life and death, the property and the spirit, of every inhabitant of Münster. A strict system of forced labour was imposed, with all artisans not drafted into the military now public employees, working for the community for no monetary reward. This meant, of course, that the guilds were now abolished.

No work > Forced labour.

The totalitarianism in Münster was now complete. Death was now the punishment for virtually every independent act, good or bad. Capital punishment was decreed for the high crimes of murder, theft, lying, avarice, and quarreling!

Notable exception: rape.

That’s how you spot the rabbit.

Also death was decreed for every conceivable kind of insubordination: the young against their parents, wives against their husbands and, of course, anyone at all against the chosen representatives of God on earth, the totalitarian government of Münster. Bernt Knipperdollinck was appointed high executioner to enforce the decrees.

Interfering with family life? Doesn’t sound like the socialist teachers we know.

The only aspect of life previously left untouched was sex, and this now came under the hammer of Bockelson’s total despotism. The only sexual relation permitted was marriage between two Anabaptists. Sex in any other form, including marriage with one of the “godless,” was a capital crime. But soon Bockelson went beyond this rather old-fashioned credo, and decided to establish compulsory polygamy in Münster.

City-wide Communist immigrant-led gang rape. And it didn’t just happen one New Year’s Eve.
Which the Red Army would also replicate in Germany, centuries later. Except you get creepy guys idolizing Russia to this day and never mentioning that literal rape of Europe.

I’m sure they rationalized polygamy (really rape and adultery) as Christian duty (as if their bodies were property of the state) despite how the Bible expressly tells us not to marry.

Since many of the expellees had left their wives and daughters behind,

For shame!

Münster now had three times as many marriageable women as men, so that polygamy had become technologically feasible.

Rabbits wait until most good men are war-dead (The Sexual Revolution happened after World Wars) or poor and desperate to make ends meet then make their move to take the women. By force. How omega.

R-types are just rapists waiting for an opening, a weakness in the native Ks. First they say “don’t defend your women” then it’s “your women?” They fail as husbands and fathers (they can’t even satisfy one wife and are permissive parents). Don’t trust so-called polygamists, usually they don’t believe in an age of consent – or, when given power, consent itself…

Bockelson converted the other rather startled preachers by citing polygamy among the patriarchs of Israel, as well as by threatening dissenters with death.

Won’t let us rape your daughter? Guess we’ll have to make her an orphan. 

Basic principle of tribal war. All war being tribal.

Compulsory polygamy was a bit too much for many of the Münsterites, who launched a rebellion in protest. The rebellion, however, was quickly crushed and most of the rebels put to death.

Along with their conscience.

Execution was also the fate of any further dissenters. And so by August 1534, polygamy was coercively established in Münster.

He raped the city itself, ironic.

As one might expect, young Bockelson took an instant liking to the new regime, and before long he had a harem of 15 wives, including Divara, the beautiful young widow of Jan Matthys.

Bros before what now?

Typical r loyalty.

Anyone who wants a “harem” is basically announcing to the world they’re a rapist.
If all those women wanted to sleep with them, they already would be, by consent, and they wouldn’t want a harem, that kills their ‘lovers’ for leaving.

Remember, Genghis Khan was a very successful rapist.
So-called “conquerors” are the most anti-male icons going, that was some other man’s daughter, sister, wife, mother. Sex traitors.

The rest of the male population also began to take to the new decree as ducks to water. Many of the women did not take as kindly to the new dispensation, and so the elders passed a law ordering compulsory marriage for every women under (and presumably also over) a certain age, which usually meant being a compulsory third or fourth wife.

Rape gangs writing the law.

Thank god we know better now.

Moreover, since marriage among the godless was not only invalid but also illegal, the wives of the expellees now became fair game, and were forced to “marry” good Anabaptists.

This is why you shoot deserters. If they’d betray their country and flee, what right do they have to come back to this?

Refusal to comply with the new law was punishable, of course, by death, and a number of women were actually executed as a result. Those “old” wives who resented the new wives coming into their household were also suppressed, and their quarreling was made a capital crime. Many women were executed for quarreling.

Anyone trying to shut up women is going to censor men too.

But the long arm of the state could reach only just so far and, in their first internal setback, Bockelson and his men had to relent, and permit divorce.

Polygamists are always for easy divorce and multiple re-marriage.
Actually re-marriage is the way they’re hoping to lube society up for it.

Because it isn’t a meaningful, loving commitment unless you can get out of it. And into it. And out. And shake it all about.

Indeed, the ceremony of marriage was now outlawed totally,

Satanists.

and divorce made very easy. As a result, Münster now fell under a regime of what amounted to compulsory free love. And so, within the space of only a few months, a rigid puritanism had been transmuted into a regime of compulsory promiscuity.”

This is what happens if you leave r-selected men in charge.
Chaos. Degenerate chaos. Learn from this lesson of history.

When the SJWs complain about male rule being violent, unfair and incompetent, they refer to r-men. The narcissism of small differences.

“Jan Bockelson seized this opportunity to carry his “egalitarian” communist revolution one step further: he had himself named king and Messiah of the Last Days.”

The Old and New Testaments were specifically written so we’d know to kill these little-dicked despots.

“It often happens with “egalitarians” that a hole, a special escape hatch from the drab uniformity of life, is created – for themselves.”

Communism for all! Except Party members – luxuries for them.
Rule by rapists.

“As soon as he proclaimed the monarchy, the prophet Dusentschur announced a new divine revelation: all who persisted in disagreeing with or disobeying King Bockelson would be put to death, and their very memory blotted out. They would be extirpated forever. Some of the main victims to be executed were women: women who were killed for denying their husbands their marital rights,

rapists, not husbands

for insulting a preacher, or for daring to practice bigamy – polygamy, of course, being solely a male privilege.”

Ah, the insecure double standards of the r-male. You can tell a polygamist is bad in bed when he won’t let his wife sleep with anyone else. But monogamy cannot exist one-way, morons, it’s a single bond between two. There’s no such thing as half loyal to your military either.

Male privilege, huh? The real thing, finally!

As we can see, some males belong on the bottom of the ladder, with no heirs, they’d destroy civilization otherwise.

We are not like bonobos, trust no one who says we were, more like a biological cross between gorilla and chimp.

“So that the king and his nobles might live in high luxury, rigorous austerity was imposed on everyone else in Münster. The subject population had already been robbed of their houses and much of their food; now all superfluous luxury among the masses was outlawed. Clothing and bedding were severely rationed, and all “surplus” turned over to King Bockelson under pain of death. Every house was searched thoroughly and 83 wagonloads of “surplus” clothing collected.

Sugar tax.

Anytime they tax actual food, you’re entering dystopia.

It is not surprising that the deluded masses of Münster began to grumble at being forced to live in abject poverty while the king and his courtiers lived in extreme luxury on the proceeds of their confiscated belongings. And so Bockelson had to beam them some propaganda to explain the new system. The explanation was this: it was all right for Bockelson to live in pomp and luxury because he was already completely dead to the world and the flesh. Since he was dead to the world, in a deep sense his luxury didn’t count. In the style of every guru who has ever lived in luxury among his credulous followers, he explained that for him material objects had no value. How such “logic” can ever fool anyone passes understanding.

Celebrities claiming they’re just like you but shouldn’t be taxed like you (nor their films).
Claiming diversity is good and making expensive efforts to avoid it.
I can see how the pseudologic would work.

More important, Bockelson assured his subjects that he and his court were only the advance guard of the new order; soon, they too would be living in the same millennial luxury.

All talk, like Elon “I’m gonna move to Mars” Musk.
Who happens to be a socialist, coincidentally.

And promises the journey to his new kingdom will be “fun” (creep code for orgies). Don’t get on the ship, folks, if you value your holes.
Logically, the greatest good for all would be letting his staff form a union…

Under their new order, the people of Münster would forge outward, armed with God’s will, and conquer the entire world, exterminating the unrighteous, after which Jesus would return and they would all live in luxury and perfection. Equal communism with great luxury for all would then be achieved.”

I’m reminded of Richard Spencer.
Anyone else?

Magically prosperous (but anti-merit) ethnostate.

Or Mars. Space Eden. For people too smart to believe in a Savior.

The stars are a nice touch.

“Despite his continual preaching about marching forth to conquer the world, King Bockelson was not crazy enough to attempt that feat, especially since the bishop’s army was again besieging the town.”

Ah, the cowardice! Predictable as a Tottenham match.

“Finally, Bockelson, long fascinated with the theatre, ordered his starving subjects to engage in three days of dancing and athletics. Dramatic performances were held, as well as a Black Mass. Starvation, however, was now becoming all-pervasive.”

The narcissism!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Mass#Medieval_Roman_Catholic_parodies_and_additions_to_the_Mass

“To guard against such a threat, Bockelson stepped up his reign of terror still further. In early May, he divided the town into 12 sections, and placed a “duke” over each one with an armed force of 24 men. The dukes were foreigners like himself; as Dutch immigrants they were likely to be loyal to Bockelson.”

This is why your ancestors never trusted foreigners with promises.

Reminds me of EU “member states” and the region planning.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regions_of_England
Why do they want a full army?

“Bockelson would undoubtedly have let the entire population starve to death rather than surrender”

Typical r.

Anyone who has to tell you they’re caring, isn’t.

“As for ex-King Bockelson, he was led about on a chain, and the following January, along with Knipperdollinck, was publicly tortured to death, and their bodies suspended in cages from a church tower.”

They’re still there, the cages.
If only they were women, they’d have instantly been clocked as witches. The vices gave them away as Satanic.

This is why men should distrust other men, especially socialists.

Their luxury comes from your labour.

Today it’s called the Labour party.

Video: Historical perspective

When you think about it we live in the most unfree, tyrannical society ever.

Holding a public opinion gets you arrested and thrown into a dangerous, deprived place full of armed disease-ridden savages who want to psychologically torture and kill you for breathing because something something Crusades.

Show me any time period in history that tops that for the average citizen.

Only the genocidal witch trials maybe. MAYBE.

We will be the future’s dystopian historical setting.

Correction:

If the State enforcers don’t like the parents, they can steal (and sell) children.

That is slavery, literally. Thanks, Blair! (not accidental)

The Lefty McCann parents still have their kids. So who’s getting robbed in the most evil (genocidal) way and their children literally abused in a system that doesn’t care, they have worse life outcomes across the board (there are many many cases if you look)?

Click to access CEYP_outcomes_06.16.pdf

Above: we make it worse in every way, let us magically make it better with even more money.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2890536/
The “care system” is systemic child abuse. I’m not being dramatic, I’m being scientific. It is a lifelong punishment without crime. Libertarians say nothing, for shame!

Abuse cases involve physical, sexual and psychological abuse, plus the fundamental isolation (human right to family life) of being kidnapped on top of prison structures (Orwellian “care homes”) inflicted on innocent people (the places have guards, it’s a prison) – so taking them out of those alleged* situations isn’t the real motive, is it? There are druggings (poisonings) and tasers involved if the child resists their effective imprisonment.

But making “bad people” aka bad parents not have kids in the first place is “evil”?

No, only if you wanted to sell them. 

Sorry, “financial incentives”.

We live in a world of fat teachers reporting children for obesity. I didn’t realise they were doctors.

Why not arrest the teachers? If the children weigh in (humiliation is illegal but they do) then why not the teachers in front of the kids?

*Implying public servants never lie to justify their job, you kidding? Why are family courts not public as common law dictates yet socially valid? That makes them technically illegal and they will be outed eventually.

Why doesn’t a child have a say in who they’re sold to? (Forced adoption is the PC term for legal human chattel, fridge horror is knowing taxpayers fund their own children being sold from them).

Why conduct social engineering experiments on helpless children they know to cause bad outcomes e.g. two “dads”, single foster parent, mixed religions that mutilate the genitals of children?

Adoption studies show it doesn’t work, they still end up like their birth parents, so “improvement” isn’t a valid excuse anymore (Jayman covered parenthood and adoption facts that go against “common sense”).

Care homes are just children’s prisons worse than 99% of the situations (they appeal to exception) they seek to “rescue” the child from and get this, many are actually privately owned. What’s the first thing a pedophile would buy into?

Their testimony, btw, is not believed, especially if they put drugs in the kid’s food.

A prisoner in for child rape has more rights and public respect for their feelings than a child in a “care home”.

So they’re taken out of a home that’s probably fine but poor (money into the home would help instead of giving it to busybodies who want to control freak a child’s life because they’re childless**) and instead abused in a system of all types then cycle of abuse means they’re likelier to “need” that system in future like a hole in the head.

Where is the logic here?

Dependence, never trust a socialist. You’re better to them weak or dead.

The state grows as the people wither.

** Measure a social worker’s saliva serotonin when they get their (sexual) high off being a control freak and order the kidnapping of children. It would be comparable to SS camp guards in Nazi Poland. Do that study, Peterson, become a legend in psychiatry. I won’t take credit, I swear. It would come under pathological altruism despite being sadistic, deliberately abusive but masquerading as altruistic for a dual boost (covert narcissism).

The McCanns neglected their children obviously, but who’s to say what is neglect and abuse? The SS as they’re aptly known tried to take children off people for political party membership (never a left wing one, it was libertarian UKIP), for being Christian and for teaching them “bad” habits like making gun noises at school during lunch or being unPC, telling the black kid at school they aren’t English and never will be, they’re African (biological fact). That last child was put on a list. Literally.

The SS are the enemy. Any excuse to intrude in your life and threaten to genocide (c, e and usually b) a bloodline they hate, think SJWs with power over innocents. For b, there are plenty of studies that keeping a child from their relatives exerts profound psychological damage, it’s essentially a form of torture.

It’s political war on your very bloodline, that’s worse than murder!

At least the child would survive you! And be raised by family, where the only good scientific outcomes happen!

They called the Rotherham rape victims prostitutes. They still do.

That is not even feminist. That’s gaslighting for terrorists (sexual terrorism), a form of treason.

Abuse of public office? Neglect (irony) of duty of care? Privileging adults over children they are sworn to defend? (They swear oaths in kangaroo court but an oath to do their damn job hasn’t been brought in because….?)

These people brought in Sharia courts in the West. A parallel legal system, also illegal and invalid.

They are the biggest child abusers in the world, by number and horror.

Look up the woman from Italy (white foreigners aren’t safe!) forced to have a C-section (which could’ve killed her!) so they could steal her pre-term (now at-risk) baby before she left the country legally to go home!

This happens every day, ruled in secret courts.

You don’t hear about it because years after the case, the poor parents can’t legally talk about it!

Is that justice? Ah, no reporters that way. Clear motive why it’s “contempt of (illicit) court”.

MRAs need to make family courts public before any other legal changes can happen, idiots.

Oh, and they target poor couples who can’t afford to legally defend themselves from the slander of monstering. Vox Day won’t dare mention this mess. A study of children taken by class membership would definitively prove the social injustice and its precise genocide.

No court should be secret in a free society.

It doesn’t protect the children, it protects the slave owners.

Why can’t the child sue the person who bought them?

Stefan won’t touch this because he’s a coward.

[And America does it too. Land of the free (unless you’re a minor).
https://www.acf.hhs.gov/cb/research-data-technology/statistics-research/cwo
https://www.acf.hhs.gov/archive/cb/resource/report-congress-cw-financial-incentives ]

White Sharia is anti-white

Do I…. do I really have to explain.

They’ve made a laughing stock and jumped the shark.

It’ll never happen, but it’s a dysgenic meme.

Still genocidal, to civilized culture.
Turning on white women, calling for us to lose all Western First World rights that our forefathers died for (so we wouldn’t get raped by Vikings and other tribes), joking about rape and torture (but male rape and gang rape are terrible?) and bitching when women say it isn’t funny, it’s crazy?
Gee, why has the Alt Right lost credibility since the misogynists transitioned over from Roosh V and the other manwhores who’d be stoned to death for touching another man’s property?

To say white women betrayed the West is simply ignorant, most of the politicians were male. Most cucks are male. Most of the left’s voters skew male, at least here.

This isn’t a sex issue, and if it were, the issue if with the weakness of their own sex.
Wanna ban birth control? Then who will sleep with you? They are morons, they don’t even see the consequences to their basic policy ‘beliefs’ because they’re all cucking for their e-celeb mancrushes and whatever shit they’re trying to push to sell you get rich quick crap. You can’t joke about the three main crimes: theft, rape and murder. Torture is out of the question. Why? We are civilized.
And they wonder why, in all their instability, women reject them?

You find our rape and torture funny when you should be angry? Ingroup preference? Racial loyalty?
These fake Nazi fags are just shock value dudebros.
It’s like insulting any woman who dares show interest and then complaining any movement is a sausage fest…
Yes. Your toxic persona will do that.
It’s false equivalence to paint Sharia as Patriarchy. They need to weaken women because they cannot cooperate.
“White Sharia represents a real threat to white women and I think it’s promoting violence against us.”
Joking about female circumcision?
Womb envy is real.
But they oppose male circumcision?
Yah, when they get upset over any kind of Male Victimhood Narrative, remember, white men are never victims if they’re superior.
Tongue removals? What kind of sick human being thinks of this stuff?
“We wanna torture them but them get off on it”
OK, yeah, arrest them.
They need to be in an asylum. I’ve heard less insanity from people in hospital prison facilities.
“We wanna dominate them, humiliate them so they can get really really horny and really really pregnant”
Freud wants to talk to you about your Oedipus complex.
Any man who wants to beat a woman is weak.
These are the misogynists that predate feminism.
The ones who want to ‘whip’ women for being female.
You don’t let sadists run a prosocial movement.
This is why I’m for traditionalism and Neoreaction.
Not one sadist.
Some slightly deluded men, but none of them are cruel or sociopathic. Can’t say the same about the PUA/MRA/MGTOW set that see women as the Enemy.
If you see white women as the enemy, not only are you a misogynist but also a race traitor. Yeah. Logically. Technically, that’s exactly it. Our enemies pushing abortion and birth control want men to hate women and blame women instead of those who brought about these dysgenic policies.
Not one of them will get to use ‘sexist’ in shrill tones as a silencing tactic again.
You wanted white enslavement. Any white enslavement.
White slavery would’ve been a better meme but that doesn’t involve their dick and it’s already happened.
They want to lose Western rights but claim to defend the west
They want to enslave white women…. to protect white women?


People who think this infiltrated the Alt Right to turn us against one another. Congratulations, you cuck or are cucked by picking up this idea to ruin your reputation.
She’s right, they’re atheist because they believe the Atheistkult narrative about Christianity being the same as Islam or Judaism, who really do treat women like that. So to hate Jews, they wanna treat White women like Jewish men treat Orthodox Jewish women. Whether or not they believe in Hell, they’re going to it. Jesus never laid a hand on any woman.
I said the AR was too popular and something must be coming to destroy it.
Yeah, let it burn. Let it change. It needs it.
Let it cut out this cancer that hates half the white native population of Europe.
They sound very herp-derp (9 minutes in).
They’re historically ignorant too. This reminds me of Roosh admitting he wants rape to be legal then backtracking to claim it was satire.
You can’t be both serious and kidding. Men were held to far more standards in Patriarchy than women. Men have to wear head coverings too, you must’ve learnt differently in America, which is known to get history wrong for Narrative. It’s in their interest to portray traditional men as superior when they were dominant – different thing, they had more duties and responsibilities, like dying in battle. You don’t get to shirk your duties and enslave women, that system could never work.
Sharia only really works in low IQ societies from inbreeding, which Sharia encourages.
Do you want inbred kids? Can you afford to be any dumber?
Doesn’t matter though since no sane woman will ever breed with these degenerate scumbags.
Only r-types rape. It’s their strategy. White men chose the higher path because they loved their daughters as much as their sons. Fashions differ by culture and time and nuns choose the veil as a symbol but not all the time. Men took the cloth and wore hoods, it’s nothing to do with women being ashamed of their femininity, which is what they want and anti-traditional. Women still wear hats, men wore most hats, idiots. Women used to work and still do – working in the field, cooking and babysitting are all jobs. There were female philosophers, writers, mathematicians, accountants, shop workers.. how ignorant is the USA not to know this?
I’ve never seen a European seriously claim this.
Islam isn’t a religion, it’s a war manual. It kills culture, these people must be saboteurs.
“You don’t save your culture by adopting an alien culture” A+
Renaissances? Scientific and Industrial Revolutions? Wanna keep them? You need to keep Christian, agnostic or atheist. You can’t force someone to believe, the others must be a choice, especially if you want the STEM advancements based on skepticism. Global warming rhetoric is based on blasphemy narratives.
“too dumb to figure out how their own culture works?” Yes.
Atomized, alienated, ignorant. They need traditionalism but seek to imitate Arabs because…They’ve been doing so well?
Personally, I think they just want to fuck their cousin and feel good about it.
“Why sow division among your own?” SHE GETS IT!
They’re all degenerates projecting onto women like Lilith – a JEWISH archetype. Hey, you fornicated and that’s your fault, your consensual choice, don’t blame the women!
“You may as well wave the white flag of surrender cos it’s gonna be the only white thing left soon!”
I love this woman.
These subverters are using the Left’s linguistic tricks, giving the Left power – can you tell they’re socialists?
Language has power, all the Left agrees. They’re adopting and cucking for MENA.
I think I know why.
They want to avoid the draft. They want to reject their duty to fight for their culture.
So they go on and on and on about ‘da women’ and ‘hahaha rape is their fault’ and ‘women should defend themselves’ – no, that isn’t how the West works at all. Why have police if we must defend ourselves? Police are the embodiment of Western chivalry. Chivalry made the West great – but the men weren’t weak. I linked to Evola and it’s true what he said – if the women are weak, it’s because of the men.
Bowing down to Saudis because a Twitter SJW was mean to you is cucking. It’s what the terrorist-defenders do.
They’ve been saying Deus vult and realised shit, they’d be the ones needing to fight for it.
They might have to brush the Cheeto dust off their keyboard! Prove themselves!
So they turn their back on their own culture’s duties and replace it with one for cowards. Islamic State are scared of women too, especially being killed by one. People like Molyneux paid lip service to blaming all women like more victim culture will save us, but he’s happily married. Same with Vox Day. Maybe they’re just telling you basement-dwelling atheists what you wanna hear for clicks?
“These guys sound like Crypto-Muslims”
I doubt most are white.
They wanna be the oppressed ones so badly but the invasion of the EU has made it clear white women are the victims.
They’re talking about ‘harems’, they’re Roosh V cultists. Under polygamy, most men don’t breed. They don’t marry or have sex.
Sexual violence has never been part of Europe excepting de Sade, a hard left writer. He’s pathological. Sexual violence is taught in pornography and by MENA – all those Arabs and Africans they supposedly hate.
Sexual violence was also used by Muslims in war against men – the conquered were forced to fellate their victors, or were anally raped by them, or a trained dog while they’re bent over a chair. This still happens and it’s why non-hetero sex is actually a form of humiliation as well as medically bad for you (STDs, cancer risk, tearing etc). In Afghanistan they reported these sickos raped little boys.
That’s what they’re calling on. Pedophilia. How are they better than the rape gangs again? Milo and Roosh brought in these people. They will never get married happily and raise healthy offspring, they’re trash. Reminder who Roosh really is….


How do they assert high ground? Their moral authority has disappeared because they like unhealthy porn.
“White Sharia comes across as a cover for their misogyny and such sexual aggression”
They believe the lies about divorce and alpha bro shit. Many are themselves brown and therefore despise whites, that’s why so many Alt Right male writers also worship Roosh, they’re not white, they’re playing whites off against one another.
They are the Muh Dicks we used to mock.
“How are you a real man if you have to be coy and manipulative with your intentions just like the women you complain about?”
R-selection.
These r-men are complaining about r-women.
They also think they can steal K-women from K-men by pretending it’s traditional.
They’d be stoned to death for rape according to Christianity. And the Bible never said non-virgin men could get married, adultery was punishable by death in both sexes. Prostitution was illegal. All pre-marital sex was rape according to the Bible. They’d be long dead under the Old Testament and I can’t that it’d be a great loss, can you?
Here’s Roosh and his Messiah complex, in case you forgot.

That’s a real photo.
“Are women that bad?”
If they’re whores, why aren’t they sleeping with you?
“Or are you just projecting?”
Yes.
If white women wanted non-white men, they wouldn’t have to rape us.
Rape apologia of any stripe has stripped them of credibility.
The feminists aren’t wrong about everything, rape offends healthy people.
“The only men who support women being raped and forcibly impregnated are men who aren’t capable of providing a safe, secure and loving environment for a woman in which she would willingly want to have children.”
Are they willing to fight her father for her honour? That’s the traditional standard.
Inferiors, socially weak men who want to adopt kleptogamy, the sneaky fucker strategy (lower than beta, actually).
If you cannot convince a single good woman to marry you, (and then breed) the issue is not with women, the failure is you. You’re failures as men. You only need to convince one, that’s the role of your sex, to display. Women select. While we’re calling Naturalistic Fallacy.
“A lot of men would find it emasculating to be reduced to beating up a woman just to get sex.”
Except Roosh, yup. They lie to themselves but the divine can see into their black shriveled hearts.
They’re going first-class to Hell. No love in them.


Logically, if they believe women are physically inferior at everything (not how evolution works) then we should be treated better? These are the weirdos who baby their dog like Paris Hilton, it’s creepy.
They are creepy, that’s why they hate the word. They want to abuse women to feel powerful because they hate themselves.
A lot are male borderlines, who think Dark Triad is cool, it’s really sad but don’t pity it. Psychopaths have average IQ and die miserable and alone. Probably after prison rape.
They think Sharia is glamorous, ew.
“If you have Mommy issues or had a bad relationship-”
Their Asian waifu dumped them.
They will never, ever take responsibility, these Peter Pans. They’re mostly in their 30s, the rabid ones, still blaming women.
Blame Momma for never getting that abortion.
Revenge fantasies are for possibly gamma, more like delta males and all the way down to omega.
This is their version of being the Secret King where everything works out with them on top…
Male narcissism, so they see it in all women.
Therapy won’t help them. They just need to be shot by the real men, and this will probably happen as the nationalists (sharia is globalist) and traditionalists (who don’t want their wives and daughters raped) rise. They have nothing to offer and that’s why they fear genuinely right-wing people.
These people are useless eaters bitching on podcasts. That’s why I don’t go on them, toxic negative people. Black pill BS.
No dreams, aspirations or visions. Their ancestors would be sick.
They don’t believe in corrective rape, it’s just revenge because women dared, DARED to reject them.
…Rejection is a fact of life, women are fully acquainted with it. Have you never been rejected from a job application?
It’s nothing to do with sex. These guys are victim culture but too chickenshit to remove kebab, if they believed in God, which they clearly do not.
“Their intent is to prey on women who had terrible childhoods [not all r-types, actually] and are already traumatized and abuse them further, while telling themselves that they’re somehow doing the right thing by her”
As r-types they wanted UNGUARDED women. Terrible childhood is code for ‘defended by no one’, easy prey.
They’re sexual predators. As I’ve been warning you.
The women will just take botanicals to abort or throw themselves down stairs than keep the children of these degenerate white trash, if they are white. Women have all the power to choose their baby-making, that’s why we nurse. They simply won’t lactate, as can happen under stress, and the baby will die naturally. This happens and it works, but takes a few weeks. They still won’t breed. According to the Parental Investment theory, good men are rewarded evolutionally and their spawn survive at a rate above, that’s why we evolved the monogamous family unit. You can’t beat the cow and expect it to produce milk. It’ll sour. They know nothing of nature, completely disconnected like the SJWs they cry.
Ask a farmer. You can’t even mildly spook hens or they stop laying eggs for ages.
This is nature, it’s protective. Women also develop amenorrhea during stress – they don’t ovulate. They don’t produce sexual fluids much either so raping them wouldn’t be like consensual sex, if you could get it in, it would hurt and you’d probably get stuck because she clamped down from fear. It would be rather easy to cut it off from that angle while he’s trapped inside.
Men get trapped inside all the time when it’s consensual. Read a book.

Nature hates you.

Not to mention the scarring of rape itself frequently makes women infertile, and that’s just one instance.
Look at the Iceland strike of the 1970s, women fight back. You need us, bitches.
You can’t claim to be better than Muslims when you’re bragging about craving the stuff they already do to little girls to this day, in places like Rotherham and many besides.
“We’re supposed to believe that this is alpha behaviour? I don’t think so.”
A man is too busy running his business and helping at home to bitch online to childless bachelors.
“This meme is incredibly degenerate, which is really hypocritical coming from guys who claim to be the thot patrol, and how is this better than Hollywood? If they’re happy being degenerate, why are on the right?”
See: The hypocrisy of the signalling right and my other one about fake Christian cucks who want to defile all women but then preach about how good and pure they are with a false conversion in their thirties. They are not right-wing. Know them by their fruit. Sex with anyone but their wife? Left-wing.
I warned ages ago that they’re trying to cuck the right and turn men against women.
Roosh started it.
He’s anti-white, what do you expect?
God will purge when the economy collapses and please God, let these cruel, spiteful, vindictive, evil ones be sacrament.
“It’s causing division on the right, it’s a Trojan horse from misogynistic men to push their agenda. They aren’t nationalists, nationalism is about love. You can’t call yourself a nationalist when you have such contempt for half your race.”

A summary of what we do, exactly that. Stop the self-hate. Big up the self-love.


She said it! They’re the ‘self-aware r-types’ trying to slow K-shift’s roll. It is literally half and you’re not entitled to another man’s daughter. At least, you need to be able to ‘keep’ her, financially, and fully. They cannot do this, most can’t even afford to support themselves solo or get married. They’re losers. They say men should be the Breadwinner but also it’s ‘superficial’ for women to value that trait? Shallow to judge a man by whether he can support you? No, that’s traditional. Like men looking for fertility and looks. Both look for character too but they ignore this because they’re ugly inside.
Nationalism protects native men and women and with both, culture. That’s it.
They feel entitled to women, including a good wife after they rack up STDs. They’re male SATC-ers, they wanna ‘Have it All’.
They have player burnout and blame the world they ruined themselves for monogamy. Pussy Parade wore them out. They weakened their pair bonding and have various addictions and diseases and psychiatric complaints now.
“They talk about women like we aren’t also suffering.”
We’re no more spoiled by modern culture than they are.
That’s what culture means.
Oh, we have Tindr? So you don’t have an account? Hetero sex literally takes two, don’t claim hypoagency at us.
“disturbing propaganda of self-hatred”
but all they care about is blaming the outgroup and their feeeeels
if they were born women, they’d be SJWs
All they have is emotional outbursting, adult tantrums, mantrums.
Does White Sharia need a safe space, you crybabies?
Kidnapping wives didn’t even happen throughout most history, the brothers and other relations would hunt down the thief. Even in tribal times, men need to earn female approval.
They can’t do this. They blame all women.
They fail to meet a standard of a single one of us, but it’s our fault, right?
I saw on a blog and mentioned here, they want Affirmative Action for sex, for losers who don’t want to marry and reproduce.
You’re entitled to nothing.
Gorilla-dick Mike Cernovich married a brown Muslim and he’s going on about a white future for Europe.
Will your children be white, Mikey?
Purge the degenerate manwhores, while you’re bitching about thots but also, somehow, women aren’t attracted to your groups?
They’re black pill, we’re white. Pure white pill. Positive futures, people.
You can’t invent anything new to go back in time culturally. They’re dense.
You need to be traditionalist or you can’t claim to be traditional, duh. Nobody will follow perverts.
Meanwhile the real Alt Right are out doing stuff and defending Europe.

https://www.salon.com/2017/06/05/europes-alt-right-launches-campaign-to-chase-down-refugee-boats-at-sea-quickly-raises-100000/
http://trib.al/Wf8eADa