The push to deracinate

Aw, the Token thinks they care. No, middle-class women are supreme bitches, you were their PC shield, their pet monkey. That’s how they actually see you, they may admit it while drunk.

A pet monkey does not give orders. You were dismissed in your routine. It was no longer funny, just sad and annoying.

“I was a white” –hahaha-haa NOPE

Let me explain since I’m not personally involved.

Awakening to what? They always knew your place. It’s the price of your admission. You don’t challenge the alpha beauty of the white woman, we’re fiery when challenged by our own, and our own men. Who are you?

White women don’t have the lowest miscegenation rates of all groups for NOTHING.

White fever friends don’t get to judge anyone about the evils of whiteness.

No more than you bonded around brown-ness or other-ness.

What do you expect when you befriend xenophiles?

You’re in their country, you are a guest. The host makes the rules.

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Befriend shallow bitches, they gonna drop you when you get uppity.

You’ll never belong. Sorry, that’s the fact. Never, ever.

The black sheep.

This was the hierarchy. You knew this when you latched on like a lamprey.

All women know how this works, don’t play dumb. If there’s a non-white alpha female she tries to veto any white competition unless they’re insecure and she can bully them. We all know what you signed up for.

Nobody believes in white supremacy like the white fever people, socially or sexually.

Let the r-types fall out with one another naturally, it’ll happen anyway.

The arrogance of white guilt

We lament that this is the way it is. Is it like that? And that? And that? We’re counting, we’re noticing.

It’s actually premeditated grieving.

White people grieve before we do the things we grieved over, it’s a unique racial behaviour.

And the longer we grieve, the more blood we plan to shed.

relevant:

They’ll remember.

All the white supremacists have one thing in common – a sense of obligation to non-whites, the white guilt, the white savior complex. If you don’t feel sorry for them, you can’t really feel superior. All SJW types are white supremacists, they freely admit they feel white people are privileged. That is a type of innate (with whiteness) superiority.

Anti-racism amounts to “sorry you’re not white”. The non-whites have noticed.

Why would white people want to be better? They never explain this.

Who would want to be considered responsible for groups of incompetents who hate you? But this is too logical to ever occur. A person isn’t just superior, they do things. A group not doing those things is, by definition, inferior.

They don’t like to explain this. But it’s the definition of the hierarchy entirely, better to worse.

Dim your shine for being white, is the message.

Apologise for being born a sinner.

They treat it as mandatory that all white people act a certain way and, by existing, cause others ‘hurt feelings’.

A lot of people say 1984 but we live in Harrison Bergeron.

THE YEAR WAS 2081, and everybody was finally equal. They weren’t only equal before God and the law. They were equal every which way. Nobody was smarter than anybody else…..

Forget who you are, who you ever were. Look, an African woman was your queen. Consensus reality, insanity.

Emperor’s New Clothes.

If you so much as wear a tie, you’ll be insulted for being white. Any goals of betterment are viewed as violence to the insane. Say you don’t like rap, they attack. Have ambitions, that’s like leprosy.

Whitey isn’t allowed to show individuality. Individualism is uniquely white.

Suppress yourselves with junk food, porn, hook-ups. The others can then look down on you, like a lion whipped by a tamer in a cage. This is why they laugh at us. This is why we’re funny or sad to them. Their weapon is shame but it’s also our solution, apply it to our own ranks. Shape up or ship out.

Why do they want to end white people as a race, if not to give the others a chance?

7 billion to less than one, and they’re still feeling inferior.

The OT was superbly clear that mercy was a weakness when following God’s orders – we’ve seen why.

If the conquered savage is not slaughtered they shall rape your daughters.

Crime – sentence.

There is crime but no sentence. This is curious. Until you know the grief response.

Profit does not enter the equation, it’s Darwinian competition.

Cui bono? Who profits by allowing your enemy to slowly destroy you? The ally of your enemy, that’s who.

Be careful with unsolicited advice.

How did I miss this?

or amazon.com/Whiteness-Original-Sin-Jim-Goad/dp/1729700411/

Whiteness is treated as the Original Sin of humanity, I pointed this out yonks ago.

In some contexts, being white is a crime, like being armed. Defending yourself physically while white? Defending yourself verbally while white? Applying for jobs or college while white? Refusing service while white? Turning down a PUA while white? Having a religion while white? Having an opinion while white?

I sense a pattern.

They’re treating whites like such unquestionable superiors they must be hobbled at all turns by the law or else outcompete everybody else. Largely, this entails curtailing natural rights and freedoms – to association, speech, assembly, representation etc. etc. Nobody believes in “white supremacy” like the hate crime people.

The truth you can’t openly say:

If you believe white people are privileged, you’re a white supremacist.

The question of white/white-passing aside. The concept of “white privilege” is white supremacy.

It has to be rooted in it, that’s the suggested biological premise.

It has to be biological because they claim you’re born with it.

They even believe in the flipside of white supremacy, White Man’s Burden.

Apparently we all have a duty to scrape and save for Africa, even though they’ve long since come to outnumber us and should logically be expected to financially assist us.

Logically, if living around whites is so terrible, all the non-whites should be forced to go home, for their own good.

Certainly, they cannot be expected to take money from their white masters. That would be evil and colonial.

Colonialism didn’t die, they just call it welfare.

It’s a little known fact that slavery always revolves around a breeding programme – how else to replace them?

Their new work – voter farms!

Held there by? The welfare cliff! The financial plantation.

If it weren’t for the news cycle and reality TV, would they take any interest in politics?

What’s the cost of multiculturalism?
Inflation.

Peter and Paul living at the expense of Saul. Hyperinflation, if you compare a century ago.

What could a dollar buy you 1900 to 2000?

No other century has seen such a devaluation of the currency serving with their socialist shithole pie. There’s probably a good economics book in it. The century of imaginary money?

Someone take that and run with it.

Without globalist demand for foreign currency, some maturity might’ve been required. The socialist politicians wouldn’t have been able to promise the world because the world wouldn’t be buying. Churchill would’ve been fingered as a blue-blood treasonous cunt, fat while others starved.

I hope the sequel is about Internalized Racism and False Consciousness Altruism.

For the cover, this gif but like the white girl at African orphanage photo blog that was shut down.

There are orphanages in white countries, Karen.

(Honestly, they treat it like visiting a zoo).

If I had to troll that, I’d set up a seaside photo scene with the face cut-out of an African orphanage photo.

Middle-class white bitch cat-nip. Are the goodwhites Uncle John?

 

 


Remember, white privilege is code for white supremacy.

18th century American women voting

No, the 20th century didn’t ruin your country.

You were meritocratic.

http://www.rutgerslawreview.com/wp-content/uploads/archive/vol63/Issue3/Lewis.pdf

For a brief period after the American Revolution, some women
were allowed to vote, in one of the thirteen new states. The New
Jersey Constitution of 1776 enfranchised not only men who met the
property requirement but women as well. The specific language:

[A]ll inhabitants of this Colony, of full age, who are worth fifty
pounds proclamation money, clear estate in the same, and have
resided within the county in which they claim a vote for twelve
months immediately preceding the election, shall be entitled to vote
for Representatives in Council and Assembly; and also for all other
public officers, that shall be elected by the people of the county at
large

No taxation without… ah, that’s right!

Representation!

Wait – it gets weirder. Other states.

http://www.apsanet.org/imgtest/freeblacksconstitution.pdf

Before 1820, free black men could vote and white women couldn’t.

So much for your IQ and race realism, huh?

Plenty of states were just male supremacist and misogynist, regardless of qualification.

[Checked: Deadlink from bookmarks, damn. Well, 1820 was the date to look up.]

Now you know why the first feminists were generally “white supremacists*“, because if you let someone you consider subhuman vote before your sister, something isn’t right. Clearly, that person isn’t meritocratic, AKA the American Way. Let the person who can (usually) barely read and write have a say, against the highly educated, who can’t?

Women were preferentially home-schooled with a governess, which we now know is better!
Plus finishing school, which everyone forgets. Bring back those.

They ended black and female voting in New Jersey in 1807 because white MEN were dressing in drag or blackface to cast extra votes.

Sounds fair.

*They wanted to be treated the same as black men so I dunno how that logic works.

It’s funny when I must correct Americans on their own sodding history.

If it weren’t so sad.

And where’s the female incentive to contribute to a society that provides no incentive?

This isn’t Communism, everyone needs incentives. Women aren’t respected by men generally as feminine or wives any more…so fewer are feminine or wives. People can (and do) suppress their natural instincts if society actively punishes them for it (say, you lose the Vote when you marry), a dysgenic outcome. And men are suppressing their paternal instinct because losers on the internet disrespect fatherhood as stupid (but Homer Simpson is insulting!).

Nobody can honestly answer that question. Incentives must come to the individual, so the reward can’t be another person e.g. men, children. And men had the “reward” of a family too, plus the Vote (when property ownership was dropped). Ancient tribes survived because they were meritocratic. You contribute, you have a say. This includes the choice to elect representatives, those representatives don’t get to turn around and limit the Producers in the society that supports their existence. And who produces more vitally than women?

Homogeneity is based on shared values and fair incentives. So for example, everyone values Christian charity and all members could have a seat at the table for free food if they fell on hard times.

It’s like how lower class men have been too stupid to realize they celebrated their own replacement for the profiteering of the rich men. Robots work in factories instead of you. Drones are soldiers instead of you. Immigrants in lower-middle job roles like taxi driver and cook, instead of you. And you welcome sexbots? Seriously?

Men celebrate their replacement for laziness and cowardice and wonder why they’re in a weaker bargaining position.

Less contribution (more restriction), less incentive rewarded.

You cut off your own opportunity, welcome to the inevitable outcome.

The problem with intelligence signalling

Someone can come along and ask for your proof.

[Assuming they can’t easily google it.]

Browse tfw to intelligent and you’ll quickly realize about half the posts have a good point the idiot reading rejects out of hand. They don’t notice shades of grey. It’s like the I Fucking Love Science people who always assume the popular consensus on a topic’s labelling (there is no pseudoscience, there are only disproven former theories) are objective, timeless fact. See: how most astrology is actually astronomy, and astronomy ripped it off.

If they bothered to google it, the whole world runs on cycle.
Plot twist: we’re part of that natural world.
http://www.near-death.com/paranormal/astrology/scientific-evidence-suggestive-of-astrology.html

This applies to internet subcults.

e.g. The literal Man Card, I win argument.

21st century American men are smarter than all women ever, it’s science!

Note: an intelligent person would still notice they’re valuing themselves based on a measurement in comparison to women as the standard. A still-smarter person would note they’re measuring themselves and class is a bigger factor, as is race.

to quote a random internet comment

as you do

“Science isn’t a consensus, if it was, a person with a lot of money could hire people with degrees and get them to say anything they want.”

The problem with credentials. They become priests with a different scroll.
They talk of rent controls, what of education controls? Renting is always useful.

Yeah, like white supremacy.

Right, Tyson?