Richard Spencer tries to cuckold libertarians

They’re irrelevant but O.K.

teadrinking sipping pretentious sarcastic bitch mmhmm not my problem lol

Globalization will die with multiculturalism. Hint: they’re the same thing, that’s why this ploy could never, ever work, Dick.

Those people don’t listen, they follow. That’s all they do. They’re Bernie lite.
Nobody plays Follow the Leader better than shitlibs.
Remember, they are left wing. Although to claim anti-fascism is a leftist myth, looking to history. Lenin, Stalin, Mao… maybe Putin.

http://freespiritedmind.com/richard-spencer-crashes-a-libertarian-conference-and-gets-thrown-out/

including because?

He quotes Ayn Rand (I know, I know).
And what a weaksauce appeal to authority. Trite AF.

“Racism claims that the content of a man’s mind (not his cognitive apparatus, but its content) is inherited; that a man’s convictions, values, and character are determined before he is born, by physical factors beyond his control. This is the caveman’s version of the doctrine of innate ideas—or of inherited knowledge—which has been thoroughly refuted by philosophy and science. Racism is a doctrine of, by and for brutes. It is a barnyard or stock-farm version of collectivism, appropriate to a mentality that differentiates between various breeds of animals, but not between animals and men.”

This predates the field of genetics, behavioural genetics, forensic anthropology, criminology and widespread acultural IQ testing.

Was Einstein’s brain normal? Not really. You can’t use Mac OS on an MS Windows PC properly and neither can you expect the performance range of one higher successful group e.g. Jews like Rand, from the platform of people who can barely stop murdering their seed crop (see Africa, and the tragic, huge failure of the Millennium Villages.)

http://reason.com/archives/2013/10/04/the-big-aid-debate-is-over

Yes, that’s a shitlib site. I can stab them with their own shanks.

Even introversion/extraversion is neurological and thereby, inherited. Look up the entire region of twin studies to reveal how laughably wrong these claims are. Is mental illness the person’s fault, then, or something you can inherit? Really pin them down on the problematic consequences of making everyone 100% responsible for their biology, when none of us chose to be born.

“by physical factors beyond his control” – biology?

Rand wasn’t a scientist. Nobody ever asked Curie. Curie FTW.

Even the most diehard Tabula Rasa fan (clinging onto a philosophy to the point of insanity) would admit culture predates our birth and gives a heavy influence so hypothetically, still a bust.
Libertarianism seeks to duplicate cultures like a socioeconomic equivalent of Copy and Paste – and that’s why it will always be destined to fail.

People are not the same. We have DNA tests, MRI scans and performance metrics. You don’t see many white men winning the 100m sprint.
At this point they look retarded, painfully slow on the uptake, at least half a century out of date, but I guess autism is all about refusing to concede overt stupidity. Pity the rest of us can see. Libertarianism is the doctrine where you must assume as your prior a belief, nay, a faith, that everyone in the world is the same intelligence level of a 120IQ white man with Aspergers living in a capital city and desperate for money to buy female attention.
If some people are less able than they are, they might need to feel guilty for once in their spoiled suburban childhood lives. They might pause to think – wait, maybe I didn’t earn all of this? ‘Check your privilege’ applies to these people because they use a nonsense condition as an excuse to be a complete, unrepentant arsehole. The male SJW’s natural home. But libertarianism has never been tried! – because there aren’t enough autistic MENSA card holders in the world. In most parts of it, they’d be murdered within five minutes for citing their paper IQ in an argument.

Libertarians want to have as much money as Republicans but never to feel guilty about it. Because child labour is so much better morally, all the way in China than ignoring minimum wages in America.

“This is the caveman’s version of the doctrine of innate ideas—or of inherited knowledge”

like language? or some little thing called epigenetics, where your ancestors can dictate your own risk of heart disease? why would medicine need that information? that’s just silly

“which has been thoroughly refuted by philosophy and science.”

no such thing, it is always pending further evidence
anti-science liars like to spread that myth though

Science isn’t a damsel with ‘honour’ to protect, you can discuss anything. ANY-THING. That is literally the whole point. No subject is EVER off the table. The method can ALWAYS be applied. NO exceptions, Mr Pope!

The kind of person to un-ironically quote this.

You can see where the autistic arrogance of atheistkult feeds in. I’m pretty sure 85% of ‘high-functioning’ aka not real autism is hubris.

He claims it’s collectivism, because Rand does. Nationalism is not collectivism, globalism is.

Libertarianism is globalism. Nationalism is capitalist, competitive. Libertarianism tells the First World it has earned its position over the Third because the truth might make them feel bad about the slave labour.

“appropriate to a mentality that differentiates between various breeds of animals, but not between animals and men.”

aka Literally what Darwin said in Origin of the Species. He opens by discussing animal breeding.

Different breeds of animal are different races within the same species.
Biology applies to all species, men are not exempt from evolution.

Article: Was Hitler a Darwinian?

Was Hitler a Darwinian? No! No! No!

Richards’ essay on Hitler calls into question the entire enterprise of stigmatizing Darwin’s theory of evolution with the term “Social Darwinism”.  It’s not as if evolutionary theory has never been used to justify unethical practices. Any idea can be used for good or bad purposes. What’s wrong is the claim that evolutionary theory is somehow especially prone to misuse or was misused in specific cases such as Nazi war policy. We owe a debt of gratitude to careful scholars such as Robert J. Richards for setting the record straight.

TLDR: No.

Immediately, one of the biggest critiques of HBD and associated information, based on Godwin’s Law, is rendered null.

Kevin-Hart-Really-o rlly lies

Links: The Evolution of Politics (naturalistic fallacy abounds btw)

Cooperative politics = Left wing
Prehistory = the time we genocided a bunch of other intelligent primates and ate them.
Not a single mention of r/K or mating strategy. Think they’re starting to get scared? Of the truth. From that point of focus on, they’re doomed.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/civilized-death/201512/the-evolution-politics-part-i

Ideas don’t scale. A tribe may survive based on genetic similarity, there is an extraneous variable causing the observed correlation. A whole continent based on the same principles would fail. See the EU for how that’s going.

“cohesive, smoothly-functioning social groups were central to the success of our species”

during times of famine, war and natural disasters for humans like the Ice Age i.e. when times were hard and lives were short (resource restriction). That speaks nothing of the ease conditions we have today and conflates the State of Nature with 21st century civilization (no, just don’t). A common good requires genes in common.

““In our view, this “gene-centric” focus fails to capture the full gamut of processes that direct evolution.”

Genes are measurable, we can look at them you daft prick, until you can categorically measure the other stuff, it will remain the focus and I needn’t listen to anything else those people have to say. There aren’t ‘missing pieces’, what sophistry. One of the issues with evobio, we have too many explanations. They are lying. To put my money where my mouth is;

  • “Missing pieces include how physical development influences the generation of variation (developmental bias);” novel mutations, genetic
  • “how the environment directly shapes organisms’ traits (plasticity);” how do you develop muscles? the body heals after stressors and this varies by the organ in organism, duh, basic incremental improvements over generations
  • “how organisms modify environments (niche construction);” it’s called mastery and caused by adaptation/reaction
  • “and how organisms transmit more than genes across generations (extra-genetic inheritance).” Loaded question, inheritance isn’t limited exclusively to the coding information packets we call genes. For example, cultural information is inherited.

This person tops it off with an outright lie covering for Kumbaya politics. “Whatever the multiplicity of mechanisms underlying evolution may be [DS: classic academic code for We Want More Grant Money], it’s clear that they often result in organisms whose behavior is decidedly cooperative and generous.” How is it clear? How often? Where? The Burden of Proof rests with you. Humans are still waging war. Other primates wage war. The diametric opposite of those things.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/civilized-death/201512/the-evolution-politics-part-ii
“Boehm argues that “egalitarianism involves a very special type of hierarchy, a curious type that is based on anti-hierarchical feelings.” That isn’t an argument, that’s an opinion, but okay.
…”egalitarianism involves a very special type of hierarchy“, everyone

They're so stupid it's a laughriot

It isn’t as if words have agreed upon meanings, is it?
FYI voting was about societal contributions in the form of tax, expressly how those were spent. Up until very recently, if you didn’t pay tax, into the pot, you couldn’t vote. Men simply managed the estates, including taxes. Women and all discounted men got the vote when the economy allowed them to live independently (20s era wealth) and manage their own taxes.