Short and tall women are slutty

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/147470490900700405
h/t Dutton

I wish they’d look racially, but this explains the r-selected LBFMs.

https://www.academia.edu/32121636/Height_among_Women_is_Curvilinearly_Related_to_Life_History_Strategy
Tall women I have noted, like Tilda Swinton seem to be left-wing in an openly aggressive, manly fashion.
Short women tend to be left-wing in a subversive fashion, i.e. infantilising rape gangs and cheating on their simp of a husband as a “poly”, the type to know they can’t play the tall woman’s game of leftism so fakes femininity to extract resources (from State, Church, simp). Assuming a short woman is more feminine is statistically wrong. She’ll be more likely to cheat from insecurity.

re Keller, M. (2013). The Genetic Correlation Between Height and IQ. PLOS ONE.
I already knew taller men are smarter and kinder to women, they’re protective. That’s why women like them, not the height per se.
Short men view women as social competition so are more likely to bully, gaslight, verbally abuse and hit them. They think domination makes up for lack of dominance. It’s moral cowardice, “pick on someone your own size” as they used to say.
Nature made taller men healthier because they’re generally better people.
Misogyny is a known factor of inferiority and most of them (with vitriol aimed in-race) are shorter than the women or average man, so subconsciously hate their mother.
Height in a man is broadly like a human’s peacock tail. It develops as a signal of genetic quality which cannot be faked and demonstrates low mutation load. There’s plenty of time before the growth plates fuse to get adequate nutrition and exercise so either their parents hate them (and parents hate more ugly children or products of other unions) or they are burdened with so many mutations it’s a small wonder they weren’t miscarried (and probably would have been without modern medicine).
One big reason modern humans are uglier is IVF, the other being maternal care for parents who simply don’t deserve it.
Read into that what you will.
Maybe the solution is more abortion, but more eugenic abortion.

Average height women have “more reproductive success” (Nettle, 2002) – cited top paper.
This also applies to the third world (they cite). Perhaps the fetish for pedomorphic women (short women, short limbs) is an r-select feature?
Men always prefer women a few inches shorter than them as a norm (so probably same class, assortative) but “markedly” short (as the paper puts it) is abnormal and suggests r-type breeding preferences (young and done, no investment).
Tall women are less symmetrical, although the way they write that sentence up is vague to spare blushes.
Medium height women have “highest mate value” – more studies needed on this. What does that actually mean? Just fertility? Beauty? Personality? IQ? What? Good family?
Jealous women were “taller or shorter than average” – damn, dare you to do a cross-racial study, that would be funny. 
So if you don’t want a harpy guys, select an average height woman (for her own race, presumably, also your own?).

If you wanna be cucked, women, marry a short man,

-or men, marry a short or tall woman.

Short is clearly a non sequitur to feminine, as it states short women are more jealous (along with tall women) of “feminine” beauty.

Average women are more repulsed by masculine women but… isn’t everyone? Can you guess my height by that?

I actually thought that was just everyone.

A few screencaps:

  • Humans are K-selected as a species, believe nobody who says otherwise. No, men are not meant to “sow oats”, it’s degenerate. The quality men don’t do that. Reputation evolved to explain this commentary on your genetic quality.
  • K-types are MORE reproductively successful in the long run, as you’d expect. Evolution is about the long run and who actually reproduces, not just “screws” in completely sterile fashion.
  • Married isn’t always better for the children if the parents (or one) are unstable, in loyalty or sanity.
  • Problem children come from problematic parents.
  • If your child is a slut, it’s your fault.
  • Sex is a physical distraction from growing up mentally, usually escaping from childhood trauma.
  • r/K isn’t really a choice, it’s mostly genetics. Posing as the other type won’t work.
  • 65% genetically heritable. Your kids will be just as slutty as you are, whoever you marry.
  • Hot women can hold out for marriage. Not – cannot.
  • Women are more than morally offended when you treat them as promiscuous (when they’re not) because you’re also calling them ugly.
  • If you want a spouse who can pair bond neurologically and raise your children as a good role model, don’t marry a former slut.
  • Better spouses are genetically fitter spouses (average women, tall men).

Pretty fertile

A woman’s face is the true indicator of fertility, it isn’t really nearly as amenable to later changes at the gym, at the surgeon or by diet. It’s a true signal, trust it over the body if there is a conflict. If a woman has an average face for her race and a “great” body, the body is fake. It must be, because they’re supposed to have developed at the same time, with the same nutrients and genes and hormones. A highly dimorphic body would also produce a highly dimorphic face by the same conditions.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234055814_Cues_to_fertility_Perceived_attractiveness_and_facial_shape_predict_reproductive_success

slight repost for SEO

“Attractive facial features in women are assumed to signal fertility, but whether facial attractiveness predicts reproductive success in women is still a matter of debate. We investigated the association between facial attractiveness at young adulthood and reproductive life history-number of children and pregnancies-in women of a rural community. For the analysis of reproductive success, we divided the sample into women who used contraceptives and women who did not. Introducing two-dimensional geometric morphometric methodology, we analysed which specific characteristics in facial shape drive the assessment of attractiveness and covary with lifetime reproductive success. A set of 93 (semi)landmarks was digitized as two-dimensional coordinates in postmenopausal faces. We calculated the degree of fluctuating asymmetry and regressed facial shape on facial attractiveness at youth and reproductive success. Among women who never used hormonal contraceptives, we found attractive women to have more biological offspring than less attractive women. These findings are not affected by sociodemographic variables. Postmenopausal faces corresponding to high reproductive success show more feminine features facial characteristics previously assumed to be honest cues to fertility. Our findings support the notion that facial attractiveness at the age of mate choice predicts reproductive success and that facial attractiveness is based on facial characteristics, which seem to remain stable until postmenopausal age.”

This is how men traditionally found a good wife in a time of petticoats. The face, neck, shoulders and arms show you the rest of her body. Their books emphasize these as important* and their fashions allowed a plunging neckline to better judge fitness. It’s also why they hated make-up, not for the flush but the drawing-on of superior features. This still happens, largely with the midface and eye area. If a girl draws on her nose, just say no.

*They were incredibly bitchy about scrawny, ugly necks and shoulders up until the Edwardian Era. Kiera Knightley’s man bod would be the epitome of ugly. They wanted tapered full shoulders and neck.

That came back in the 1950s, for similar post-war fertility need reasons.

Note the thighs match the neck, so no thin necks either. Lithe arms, nice legs. It’s a rule. They considered the neck and wrists feminine and seriously, what woman nowadays goes to the surgeon about those? It’s a clear signal, still.

Breadth of hips imitated in elbows, palms and knee joints. It’s the same genetic input. A woman with large hips and tiny knee joints has had surgery. The knees develop before puberty to accommodate broad hips. At puberty, they can get even bigger as the legs get longer, so there’s no woman with long legs, regardless of height, and tiny knee joints. It’s impossible, biologically. Otherwise, they’d have biomechanical issues with walking. There’s an angle I can’t be bothered to look up produced by broader hips down to the knee joint and when it exceeds a certain level or gradient the woman can’t actually walk, literal mobility issues. The shoulders aren’t broad in bones (that’s masculine) nor are the feet in women. Long feet are a direct metric of height to stay upright, it’s a hinge but slender feet are the feminine marker and foot-binding’s purpose was narrowness. A woman with broad shoulders and narrow, bound feet has trouble walking. Men also have broader feet to match their shoulders. They throw a lot of weight forward.

A gamine type body, with one or two pleasing features (e.g. just a small waist and long legs) would also produce deficits in maternal instinct and capacity. Caveat emptor. This is important for men selecting a wife, as opposed to a quick shag (what society tells you). If you have a choice of two women, pick the nubile one.

Curvy women may sag, yes, but they don’t come to resemble a man, especially after menopause (see study above).

I’d like to see a study of husband’s desire for his wife by body type. Imagine the outrage. Apples/Naturals would be the worst. Just avoid women with broader shoulder bones than hips. You can tell at a distance.

Healthy shoulders and such are ignored nowadays with dire sub-fertility consequences. Babies eat that fat.

Note, a daintier wrist because the elbow join is broader.

The entire body is a signal, T&A is a ((distraction.)) Padding will do those.

Note the emphasis. That was behind Marilyn’s charm. Victorian body in 50s Americana clothing.

Nowadays we have knee length skirts as normal but very low necklines as odd or even offensive. It’s possible to derive fitness better from the legs, like a deer, really, or a horse, but most men have lost the skill or drive, fetishising tights and heels instead. Upper class men still judge by and fetishize the legs and were behind the rationing shift in fashions to display them. Middle class men fixate on backsides but not hips, which would be a superior indicator as breadth. Lower orders fixate on breasts, high time preference indicated. The woman herself may already be pregnant.

What is a wife in the Bible?

http://www.womeninthescriptures.com/2010/11/real-meaning-of-term-help-meet.html

According to Genesis, not inferior.

 I learned that kenegdo could also mean “in front of” 

You don’t marry an inferior.

She was designed to be his mirror opposite, possessing the other half of the qualities, responsibilities, and attributes which he lacked.

Eve was Adam’s complete spiritual equal, endowed with an essential saving power that was opposite from his.

 

Where are all the K-types? [good men, good women]

Has she been reading me?
This is basically verbatim what I’ve been saying.
You self-improve and you’re not entitled to anyone.
You don’t deserve a good person.
Good people are naturally attracted to other good people.
If they don’t want you – guess what. You’re not good enough. You’re likely aiming too high and don’t know your MMV.
My marriage matrix is one of the most popular posts.
It’s also common sense.
The worst one is when sluts want a virgin.
Seriously, WTF is wrong with you? What’s with the fetish?
What happens after the honeymoon? They’ll hate you even more than another slut would.

For practical K-virtues in a man?

This girl nails it.
So clearly, men try to disqualify and ignore her.
Obviously you need to be independent to ~keep~ a wife and ~support~ a family.
It isn’t shallow to say that’s the goal, it’s basic biology.
Your forefathers are laughing at you and weeping at your tantrums over the way the species operates.
It’s bare minimum. If you don’t have one set of ambitions, why have the other that can’t be supported on air?
It’s like wanting a sportscar and never saving money but dropping five figures on gourmet coffee per year.
Your problem is obvious as it is basic.

If you can’t look after yourself, alone…………

The idea women don’t have a right to describe to men what they demand in a mate is preposterous.
The list wouldn’t be shocking, basically good father material.
She should’ve bullet-pointed. Try to be…..(more)
If the answer would be “I wouldn’t want my father to be that way” it’s a bad thing.

Briefly, K-women are at more of a premium than ever. They can afford to be more selective than ever. If you don’t respect this, they made the right choice in rejecting you. And wouldn’t you really rather a woman say No than accept you into an unhappy marriage because you were available to one another, despite the lack of fit?

The woman trying to secure a man, any man like a leech… because her biology is screaming at her, isn’t a good woman, the one you want.

Men can’t really perceive lack of fit in a relationship, women need our EQ for this, the peahen discernment skills.

Men display, so be the best unique display of yourself you can be.
Then who cares if you find your swan? You’ll be developed, you don’t need an accessory, scantron wife of attributes XYZ to impress other men, man.

Word of advice?

Don’t be so blackpill and embittered.

Women run a mile. We know everything sucks but it makes you sound personally weak.

Don’t do the macho thing either.

We can see right through you and you can’t keep it up the rest of your life.

Actually, a list of Don’t Do (This) would be more useful.

Then they’d bitch at us more for telling them the truth – you can’t handle the truth!

Selfish people get divorced. Don’t be selfish.

Useful links
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/11/08/the-simple-decision-to-marry/
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/04/10/women-used-to-be-ladies/
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/01/27/born-again-christians-are-the-worst-cucks/
Don’t think you can trick us, we’re not stupid.
The majority of child IQ is maternal IQ, do you want dumb kids?
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/10/31/links-the-sexual-revolution-robbed-women-men-have-never-had-it-so-good/
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2016/11/09/todays-women-yesterdays-prostitutes/
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/10/15/where-are-the-real-men-where-are-the-good-men-dead-mostly/
“Men gave up first. They gave up on the white picket fence for a few easy lays”
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/10/18/link-the-blue-pill-expectations-bubble/
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/03/02/why-do-i-keep-things-simple/
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/02/04/why-wont-women-wait-until-marriage/
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/01/02/why-cant-slutty-men-find-non-slutty-wives/
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2016/12/28/link-why-are-women-so/

Too much brain?

Look at all the vintage inspiration stuff.
Make a private pinterest board to start figuring out likes/dislikes.

Design the life you want.
Life design is crucial and really what self-improvement is all about.

Actually, why aren’t there any vintage man blog and youtubers? Vintage lifestyle, music, fashion, books…. I’d like to see that, it’d be good for men.

Start with artofmanliness.com 

Be the best man you can be.

 

Actual hatefacts to offend everyone

OR
Nevermind, your fear is completely justified.

Feel free to make your own.

So let’s talk about the Red Pill, shall we?

This little red pill where any group is magically exempt from criticism… almost like a privilege. Offense is “how dare you imply my demographic is morally fallible!”

Shall we?