Why are Asians against Yellow Fever?

As a token, common example.

I came across this,

https://nextshark.com/asian-dating-website-creepy/


Fake femininity, told ya so. It’s fake as Bella Hadid’s plastic face.

They drop it when you put a ring on it – or stop making so much money.
They also drop it around other women, especially white and/or blonde women (seen as competition), which is how I know from plenty of experience. They do have a bitch side, every woman does, and if you’ve never seen it, it must be BAD.

Vaguely controlling in a distinctly abusing manner, behind a veneer of sweetness.
Read around, the worst kind of abuse happens with a smile. They do it knowing it’s hard to say no. Feminine wiles? Toxic ones.

To be fair, in some ways they have to be behaviourally conditioned as female and kittenish, girlish, to get a date, it’s a social pressure. If they behaved like mature and serious adults, the disconnect to their pedomorphic features would creep even a fetishist out.

They’re the biggest SJWs too but, sure, white women are the only gold-diggers in existence (???).
If the poor woman being hit on and harassed by these guys doesn’t go along with it, they chalk it up to a demure culture rather than being a bitch. Because all white women are sluts, right?

They say they’re attracted to Asians…
Until she refuses to dress, talk and act the way they want.
Usually like a teenager.
Nothing creepy about this at all. Controlling? Men? Domestic abuse rates?
Don’t look at this pesky things! That’s misandrist!
As she points out, it is …what is it they call it? Positive racism?
They still have their ‘white privilege’ even if they breed out. You don’t lose the racist card to SJWs.
The fetishists are still all about the women-pleasing and putting random women on pedestals, only they took a love of anime too far.
I feel sorry for the women fetishized who didn’t want any part in this, like the women that tool grabbed by the neck in Japan.
WTF is wrong with these borderlines and narcissists? The former is difficult to spot in men but they fear abandonment and therefore seek control in relationships, the guys going on and on about how a white woman would 100% divorce them but an Asian never would (I should look up those stats) are pinging.
Why does she show her guns, you might wonder?
Well, the lower dimorphism in Asians means the women are more masculine (by androgyny) than the average white. So they aren’t even more feminine, the culture has to enforce this!
That is precisely why the biggest SJWs are now Asian. They’re opposing the culture that tells them to fake femininity to get men interested. The future of social justice is yellow, with black back-up.

Peruse
http://creepywhiteguyspart2.tumblr.com/
at your pleasure
They don’t even like these women, and these women know it.
I’m on the side of the gold-digging Asian at this point, these bastards deserve it.

They think Asians are ‘tame’ and will hereby put up with any rudeness, up to and including abuse (including the lesser-known sexual sadism, ropes and choking and such).

http://iamwizz.tumblr.com/post/153009511824
“You shouldn’t have needed it, but if you did need proof to the “you can date a POC and still be extremely racist?” HERE IT FUCKING IS.”

They’re still called racist because if anything they’re more racist than whites who only date other whites.
They’re seeing the person, not the complexion. For signalling points?
Nobody deserves to be spoken to like this. No human.
Grade A proof of the Mantrum too. It’s literally nothing to do with him. They’re emotionally unstable but have no period to blame.
Thankfully the non-white women are onto the fact that there are crazy white men with personality disorders who think ‘dating down’ gives them an excuse to be abusive.

Essay by son of White man with Yellow Fever

I keep seeing these heartbreaking cases.
Nobody listens to them. Nobody cares.
We prioritize the sex lives of the parents without a shred of sympathy for the health and life of the child. I’ve never met one that didn’t self-hate and live a miserable life, because of a choice that was never theirs.
It’s the reason I keep bringing it up. This has severe consequences.

I mean, what can you really say?

Poor love.

A Keanu is one in a million. Good for him, though.

I genuinely feel like that’s being born in some kinda prison. Mulatto are accepted, at least.

found from

https://www.lipstickalley.com/threads/wtf-to-be-the-asian-son-of-a-white-man-and-asian-woman-is-an-unimaginable-hell.660399

To quote what they quote, which is bad enough.

So what is it like? Humiliation, degradation, terror, fear, embarrassment, shame, self-hatred, angst, debasement, sadness, hopelessness, pain, anger, rage, etc etc need I go on? You can’t imagine the internal conflict. The brutal civil war inside all Hapa males. The Hapa Paradox. We exist because Asian men are humiliated and emasculated, and yet we are Asian males. We are at war with ourselves from birth. The idea that an Asian man like me, is genetically 50% white, and carries ONLY the white-male Y chromosome. The Asian Y-chromosome is dead in me. Asian maleness is dead in me. I’m a Eunuch. I’m an Asian male inside a dead Asian male. That is what it means to be half-white, half-asian.”

Was shagging an Oriental for your fetish really worth it?
Hating yourself is one thing, but loathing your future spawn is evil.

He feels cucked, to name the Beast, and there is parasitism on par with the cuckoo bird in cases of dominant genetics e.g. Asian in this case, Asian genes dominate European. Few people know this but think about it.

“All the way back in the 2nd grade, thats how I defined my identity. I would introduce my essay by saying My name is SEML and I’m half white and half asian. So when I was only 7 years old, that was already who I was. My very identity. The thing that made me me, for better or worse. And life has shown it is only for worse. The law of life for the Hapa male is that Murphy was an optimist, everything that can’t go wrong, will go wrong. Has gone wrong. Life is a daily rape for the Hapa male. One long humiliation. One long emasculation. It feels like acid runs through my veins, like my skeleton wants to jump out of my body and strangle me. That is what it means to be an Eurasian male. The very term Hapa is a colonial term from Hawaii. A slur. And what else do Hapas deserve but slurs? So its appropriate that Hapa pride means taking pride in a slur. Non-Hapas can not imagine what it is like to be a Hapa. To be the Asian son of a white man and Asian woman. It is an unimaginable hell. Dante’s Inferno could not devise a more cruel torture. Its like being strangled from the inside.”

People are going to laugh at him for this.
For daring to be honest and disapprove of his parents, hating what they each were.

What kind of life do WM/AFs think they can give their Asian-looking sons? What goes through their heads, when the DR says “its a boy”? What right do they think they have to rule over an Asian man? What makes a white man and an asian woman a parent to an asian man? How can they curse an innocent infant with such a miserable life that they have created? they make this world a shitty place to be an Asian male, and they then create an Asian male.

It is the worst form of child abuse.”

We need more mixed-race kids being honest with their parentals.
Their kids are entitled to their opinion, damn it.
But it isn’t PC, CM protects them. The children are left to… well, I looked at the psychiatric outcomes.
It isn’t good.

Knowing your parents hate the respective halves of you they contributed must do a number on your head.
They aren’t allowed to be public with this, in general.
Knowing at least one parent chose the other, not based on love, but a sexual fetish?
Knowing this from a young age?
Poor dear.

“Its bad enough being an Asian-American male watching WM/AF from the outside. Can you imagine being a Hapa male, feeling WM/AF from the INSIDE? Feeling WM/AF inside you? It is a rape. Life is just a long torture and rape for the Hapa male. Hated by all.”

rape is the correct use of the term, a forcible taking
he feels his identity has been taken away from both sides and that is correct

“Asian males hate hapa males too, when they realize they are hapa. But Asian men are right to hate Hapas. When they look at me, all they can see is WM/AF. Can I blame Asian men for hating me, when I hate myself far far far more for the exact same reason? If they knew more about me, they would hate me more. To the white race, I’m just yellow subhuman scum. The best I can do is get on my knees, and constantly advertise my white dad, and beg for a modicum of acceptance. The good guys hate me because I’m evil, the bad guys hate me because they are evil. Hapas are unloveable monsters. Freaks. Beasts. Subhuman scum. We wander this earth, hounded from all directions. Strangers in every land. Homeless. Raceless. Strangers to strangers. We are ghosts without bodies.”

There are non-white forms of genocidal breeding, we don’t point this out often enough.

The way he feels is valid and he has every right to own those feelings.
I just hope he gets professional help with those issues instead of suicide, like many of them.

And then I think 1/4 children Asian women produce are in my exact same situation. To be hapa is to be hapless. The one good thing about being hapa is you have 1 WM/AF in the world you can hold hostage- your own parents. WM/AFs don’t have to give a shit what their Asian brothers, fathers, family and friends think. They do have to give a little crap what their own son thinks.”

the parents deserve to be hated
They cursed their child.
look at dating studies sometime, at the very least?

“So its a big deal to them, when the offspring of WM/AF calls out WM/AF to their face. That is the one power in the world, Hapas possess, the power to be a terrible son. Hows that for a revolt against Confucian filial piety?

Will you call me a racist if I say I hate white men?”

If you mean your father, not at all. That is rather common if they fail as a father figure. You have that right. He behaved in a way that screws you over for life. It’s reasonable to be angered and you can’t exactly get over it, can you?

“How can you when I am just as white as I am Asian?”

there are anti-white whites

“If I’m to give the devil his due, and say one nice thing about white men it is that his sperm produces beautiful daughters, while Asian sperm produces repulsive she-beasts.”

I can’t argue against this, except for maybe the first part. Only to other fetishists.
If we banned cosmetic surgery,the truth would out. The women from these unions do look Other.

“A whiteboy writes: “WHITE GUYS AND ASIAN GIRLS ARE THE FUTURE , TOGETHER THEY ARE GOING TO CREATE A EURASIAN SUPER RACE OF BEAUTIFUL AND HYPERINTELLIGENT CHILDREN”

no such thing as a super-race that is mixed, that blurs both selective advantages in both composite groups, it’s called genetic load in formal scientific terms, they are novel mutation combinations – see organ donation issues
Darwin 101
the superior race is the #1 competitor, that’s it
and to say mixed race IS a race (when it’s comprised of two or more) is a category mistake
it’s logically impossible

“; Glad to be part of that future of beautiful and intelligent Eurasian males, who get treated by the world as Asians and thus look at WM/AFs including their own parents the same way bitter Asian guys do.”

I don’t think the Forneys of the world understand just how bitter their own sons would be, especially since they think they can lecture the outgroup child on masculinity, as he pointed out earlier. They have neither the right nor the cultural training. You can’t learn it. You need to have grown up inside the system to understand it.

“So anyway thats just a little window into the world of the Hapa man, one of the fastest growing populations in 21st century America!”

Link: The stupidity of ‘White Sharia’, it’s anti-reality

They’re the type of kid at school who just lied lied lied lied lied and expected everyone would just go along with it.

In a little kid, it’s passable. In men over the age of 21, it’s a mental illness.

I’d bet a lot of them are male borderlines, considering their neurosis over wife abandonment. They get hostile if you question it, there is such a thing as a happy marriage, just not one that involves them. They are the problem.
They don’t mention most of the worst divorce stories are actually inter-racial, white husband and Asian wife.
You’re not supposed to ask, it triggers their narcissistic rage when you question their brain. There isn’t much in there.

https://alternative-right.blogspot.com/2017/06/white-sharia-alt-right-at-war-with.html

It actually came from the manosphere, not the Alt Right. They bled over here and want to bring their dindu Muh Dick ways with them. They think this is mature and manly, as opposed to the shameful self-control of a bonobo.
The woman question? Is that the best name they can come up with? That sounds like a pathetic attempt to draw focus.

Oh, what would that look like?
Like, most rapists are women?
Most murderers are women?
Most deadbeat parents are mothers?
Er… yeah, it isn’t a *woman* problem, is it?

It comes down to – women won’t be my free whore, the problem is women, the whores. 

They want to control the return to traditionalism because they’re too scared of women to be nice to them and perhaps maybe marry and pass on their shit(skin) genes.

Look up the Iceland strike. They’d die without female cooperation. They deserve to, by Parental Investment Theory. Humans need both parents or they’re messed up. A lot of these guys love/hate their mother, especially if their father cheated on her. To this day, they blame her for his fuck-ups, literally.
Sharia only works on the low IQ, it’s designed to keep them from killing each other. The high IQ have meritocracy and cooperation and that’s why we’re civilized. The Ice Age improved our genome past that point, see A Troublesome Inheritance.
The history they claim has never existed, they believe in the mommy-wife apron Fantasyland that only existed in 50s vacuum cleaner adverts. And if women are homemakers, men must be soldiers. You don’t get to sit on your ass in the unions or be a paid-up party man.

They are totally ignorant of ancient and European history but spout off about white people. The keyboard alphas there are 9/10 non-white, it’s the dirty secret of PUA – brown man seeks white harem.

Let’s take a few of the rationalisations;

“Women’s sexual desires, almost universally, are straightforward and one-dimensional; they desire the physically strong and dominant man.”
Biology says that’s men with simple lust, quit projecting. You can’t even get a woman to orgasm, don’t pretend you know how we work. In long-term mate selection studies, women choose the ‘Dad’ model and reject the ‘Cad’, you are literally 180-degrees wrong.
“Therefore, race is not a romantic factor for women. They simply want the strongest.”
White women miscegenate the least in all dating website studies. On theapricity forum, for example, many of the ‘white people preservation’ men, are dating Asians.
“And white men are pussies, which is why white women increasingly prefer non-white men.”
Would a white man write that? Who planted that idea? Disciple of Roosh?
Who told you who they prefer?
Where’s your data? Your opinion is not valid, at all.


Why all the assaults and harassment and rape gangs if the white women actually wanted them?

“Anglin attempts to pound his readers into submission by aggressively insisting his claims are settled science—this is a common tactic people use to try to cover for the fact that they’re full of crap. You’ll notice, for instance, that nowhere in the article does he link to a single scientific study. (Although he does provide links for his readers to purchase steroids.)”
Oh, steroid brain. It reduces your humanity.

If it’s settled, you must have a list of studies with cracking methodology.
…..They never do.

But they’re definitely projecting because as this genius links

They have Yellow Fever and want to pretend the white women didn’t want them first.
https://meetville.com/blog/the-uncomfortable-racial-preferences-revealed-by-online-dating/

Instead of attacking White Fever, they attack women.
Almost as if the men writing it….have it?
divide and conquer, cleave the white man from women, and the women are defenseless…
POS r-types

Their greatest enemy is chivalry, which is actually human decency.
Chivalry also applied to other gentlemen, like, they don’t even bother knowing what words mean, the illiterate brown bastards. It existed in the upper classes because they lugged around the big weapons…like cops carrying guns now. They follow a code, right? What do you think that is?

“The only consistent messages from the data is that the majority of women want a man who (1) is taller than them and (2) is not a fat slob.”
where they fail us
they think they can raise an incest baby grown in a fake womb
but they lack the time out of their busy schedule of bile to lose the chub

Women are sexist if they don’t want a short, balding, lazy fatass.
– they’re literally fat acceptance feminists with the sexes inverted

They don’t know how repulsive they are. It’s the entitlement. They think Patriarchy would entitle them to a wife. Like, what, fathers care so little they hand out coupons?

And I bet Mr 3.5 thinks he would get a cute, 17yo white 8.

You prove financial stability, the woman provides her fertility, idiot.
Women do provide – life. You can’t print life at the bank.

In Biblical times, men had rites of passage. You didn’t pass? You didn’t pass on your genes. Stop crying, baby.
They don’t actually study how patriarchies worked, especially with white people.
You’d get strung up for defiling someone’s daughter – for some reason they aren’t too keen on listening to rape victims…. acting like the rapist is the Real Victim Here.
They use fake screen names and no photo because you’d see the racial composition here, and the lower average IQ of those groups.

“Are you beginning to see just how far the ideology of the neo-patriarchic Alt Right is disconnected from reality?”

the word is ‘psychotic’, Gerry

“Just try to think about the real world for ten seconds. Which of these statements do you honestly think is closer to the truth: (A) The most attractive 5% of women tend to date the most attractive 5% of men. (B.) The most attractive 5% of women tend to date the toughest 5% of men. Of course, there is some overlap between these two categories of men, but clearly (A) is the right answer. If you’re an adult and haven’t noticed this by now, you’re either dumb as a rock or have very eccentric tastes in women.”

They are too dumb to believe in Darwin. Roosh actually reviewed a book of philosophy by a modern writer and thought he disproved evolution. You see, Darwin would mean women are right to have standards – the peacock displays, not the peahen.

They don’t believe in male beauty or more literally, the manosphere refuses to believe in their own ugliness.
They can’t rub testosterone cream over their mug and look like Brad Pitt.

Practically, none of this will ever happen.

How are you gonna get these women from their fathers? Is that not pedophilia? How can you marry someone without consent? Won’t they just throw themselves down the stairs if you rape them pregnant?

The lookism guys are much smarter and genuinely self-improving. The PUAs hate those guys, because they get results.

They know deep down it’s about them and their deep ugliness but this makes them bitter. They have to cheat, like an Asian chick getting tit implants to get a white boy interested. For the first time in history, the low SES have a voice online.

“This Manosphere/neo-patriarchy stuff isn’t just embarrassing because it’s so thoroughly wrong, it also comes off as really pathetic. The Alt Right is supposed to be a serious ideological movement, not a self-help seminar. For a movement that spends so much time worrying about trying to appear as the “cool kids” (way too much time), you’d think people around here would be sensitive to how “beta” this looks to most people. You live in a country where women consider white men to be most attractive, so if you’re having a hard time out there, I’m sorry brother, but that’s on you. Don’t taint the ethnonationalist cause by associating it with your sexual frustrations.”

They are not Alt Right.
They are MGTOW who reject K-selected unions and never want to marry.
They are genetic suicides who don’t want children unless they can abandon them to a nanny.
There is nothing traditional in them. They think it will oppress or upset women, that’s their motive, to hurt women in revenge. [cough Elliot Rodger cough]
Since when has a good husband and motherhood upset a K-woman????
WHEN?

These losers call themselves redpill but ignore any data that isn’t cherry-picked to cater to their feelings.
Oh, but women are special snowflakes because …periods?
What’s their excuse, broflakes? They’re like Trigglypuff if you mention the world doesn’t revolve around their micropenis.
They can’t attract women because they hate women. Duh.
“Since ideological truth is subjective, you can base your ideology on anything, but just because you can, doesn’t mean that you should. One thing the neo-patriarchists should do though, is man-up and admit they were wrong.”

They’re Peter Pan fuckboys, they’re trash. They’re so passive aggressive they’ve sabotaged their own lives, let them go and destroy themselves. They have the right.

The strangest thing about these discussions?

They deny HBD (on race) but then try to mouth off on HBD topics…. with no awareness of how HBD findings are compiled or any real, good data.

They’re sub-100 IQs trying to pass themselves off as mathematically literate.
Milo started this with one (literally one) article on an IQ finding.

He didn’t want to be scientific and get a psychometrician in, just punch down (as he sees it). It’s like a 13yo’s view of strength, the bully model.
Their role models are a Jewish homo and Roosh, who supposedly has both Jewish and Muslim blood…. that explains the nose job, frankly…

yeah, these guys wanna bring in Christian patriarchy, we can trust them!

Bonus: the sad autism of notch counters.

The phenomenon pointed up here with our lad is that of the “notch count.” In his case, the notches are for amusingly inconsequential things: hugging his cousin, having an internet “girlfriend” for a week or so, etc. Our lad exults in his “success” with the ladies, when in truth his supposed achievements have been minimal to non-existent.  But to chortle at his embarrassingly unearned exultation misses the broader critique implied here. Even if that which counts for legitimate “notches” in our lad’s estimation doesn’t amount to much in our perception, his degradation doesn’t consist in his absence of “legitimate” action; rather, it lies in the fact that he, like many men, base their feeling of masculine self-worth on the number of “notches” they have obtained.

from https://alternative-right.blogspot.com/2015/10/autistic-notch-count.html

They’re trying to be the popular girl…. by being sluts.
Manwhores have the dignity of jailbait. Look how much of a fake they can be, to get women to laugh!
It’s counterphobic, they hate/fear women so spend all their spare time… literally fucking women over.

The bad women couldn’t control men without sex. Feminists told men that being sluts was something to brag about….. figure it out. I hate to see adult males demean themselves.

Yes, Asians fake eyelids

They fake a lot, actually. This is level 1 of Operation Half-White Baby.

Asian cosmetics are plain better than ours, if you bother to look. The intent of it all? Snag a husband.

But the white girls are fake for using concealer, right? Red lipstick?

While the manosphere is discussing the pedomorphic neotony of Asians, with a focus on the eyes and claiming this is superior because it’s more feminine than white women…..

…that’s because it literally isn’t real.

Let’s quote the denizens of Roosh V’s forum, shall we?

There is a reason women put on fake eyelashes, it will make their eyes look a bit more distanced from each other and larger. With the help of makeup they can look more “sweet”

They basically don’t have eyelashes. Short stubby things that grow directly outward.

It’s part of the fake femininity thing. Here we call it a cutesy act.
Remember, most fake geek girls were/are Asian.
As I pointed out before, otherwise their childish looks would freak you out, if they behaved their age.


The fake eyelashes are worse than a Kardashian. How are you not getting this?

More fake lids!


Superior femininity, right guys?

Bigeye widespace girls are quality. Warm, generous, sensitive.

Deep socket girls have intellectual depth, honesty, and conscientiousness.

ANOTHER!


The surgery can be superb though….


You’d never know, would you!
Well, until she gives birth. By then, you’re fucked too!
If natural lids were retained, this would be the result.


It’s called “monolid makeup”, look it up.

Because white women are traps.

Race traps.

Look at the angle of the eyebrows. There is no nurturing quality at all. Combined with her eyes there is a soul-less quality to her stare. I can’t quite tell what it is about the eyebrows but hopefully you guys see it too.

I may be going insane but I’ve picked up on certain facial characteristics that tend to be common with bitchy and non-nurturing females.
The biggest one is the manjaw of course.
Also, small beady eyes that are close together.

While on the subject of Edenic anthropology, Asian women can have manjaws.

That chick is not widespace, but she is definitely bigjaw and wideface. The latter two are testosterone indicators, so I would expect more aggression, abrasiveness, higher sex drive – pretty much how Roissy describes his lawyer chicks. Her eyes are not very large, either, so reduced sensitivity.

Most of them do, actually.

You just aren’t looking.
The hate-on for whites is too strong.
This graphic is from a facial study.

Look at that manjaw. Look at that thing! You can grate cheese on it. It is a sign of high testosterone.
In other words, if you have two equally cute girls, go with the one with the higher pitched voice, the more feminine waist to hip ratio, and the smaller jawline.

WHR? Asian women are definitely out.
More Roosh forum quotes! Always more!

Masculine facial traits include:

Pronounced chin
Robust brow region; small eyes
Marked mandibular breadth (wide jaw)
Strong chin
High, pronounced nose bridge and/or greater nasal width

Perhaps if I use their own words, it’ll sink in.

Feminine facial traits are neontenous traits, signals of youth (i.e. traits that children/babies have), basically the opposite of above:

Gracile features, flatter faces
Reduced chin
Reduced brow region; large eyes
Weak chin
Low, subdued nose bridge, with lesser nasal width

In context, this part is hilarious.

This is why East Asian girls and white girls are so popular among men. East Asian girls have the most gracile facial morphology; white girls “cheat” with large eyes. 

It’s like they can’t see over their erection.

Studies? No? No studies?

Like, one group is literally faking its eyelids and not one of them has the slightest idea.
But they’re 100% accurate judges of women, yes Siree!

not one had the intellectual curiosity to look it up

A little more, I have plenty of salt spare to rub in this ax wound


You could build a boat with a jaw that broad, their long hair is meant to conceal it.

And if you compare the races…


Source: http://www.asianplasticsurgeryguide.com/overview/asianeuropeanface.html

White women are gracile in bone structure. According to the plastic surgeons.

Maths, I hear you cry?!

Asians are literally broader as a race.

http://www.asianplasticsurgeryguide.com/overview/westernization.html
http://www.asianplasticsurgeryguide.com/news11-1/031104_han-chinese-most-typical.html

Here’s something to trigger you, if you’re naive to China.

“Either way, the world’s most common face is, and will continue to be, fully Asian, whether Eastern or Southern, well into the distant future.
The concept of “Asian” cosmetic surgery as a limited subspecialty of plastic surgery is already disappearing as this evolving discipline now encompasses the largest patient base on the planet.
Celebrities and models glorified in the West (and East) as today’s “beautiful” are already old news, really just tomorrow’s “fixer-uppers,” even if they don’t yet know it.


Can we get Heartiste’s take on that?
Sounds fake but OK.
Like none of those bitches would look like Amber Heard, given half a chance.

What does this mean for cosmetic surgery? Look for a “new” phase in Asian plastic surgery where the primary goal will be to look better rather than mainly different or “Westernized.” Operations like double eyelid surgery, epicanthoplasty, cheek and jaw reductions, calf nerve ablations, and so on will degrade into obscure footnotes in old textbooks on outdated plastic surgery.

“Ethnic” plastic surgery will come to refer to surgery on the European or Western population seeking “Easternization.” A whole new group of operations will be developed in response to new demands.
When will all of this happen? In a hundred years? In fifty years? With the present rate of change, give it a good ten years.”

Don’t let mathematical fact get in the way of your fetish.

They’ve been trying to replace white women this whole time.
This whole time, anime was war.

Race, class and LSAT score

I’m going to do something unusual for an alt right blog.

I’m going to defend black people.
Obviously, I’m not going to go about this in the obvious manner.

I saw this and it seems far too smug.

I’m going to do something quite rare on blogs.
Maths.

Obviously.

Averages for every race, integer ranges and the implications.

Mean of classes in LSAT score by race;
Am-Indian 32.34 mean, 31-34 range
Asian 36.005 mean, 34-37 range (tutors almost guaranteed)
Black 29.25 mean, 27-30 range
Hispanic 33.83 mean, 31-34 range
Mexican 33.4 mean, 31-34 range (almost like they’re exactly the same…)
Puerto Rican 32.23 mean, 29-33 range
White 37.35 mean, 36-38 range.

Fact: Blacks are screwed by Hispanics most of all (the narcissism of small differences).
Mexicans are the same as Hispanics, at least by these LSAT scores, regardless of class (a sound proxy for $$$ spent on education).
Despite pouring money into an Asian kid’s education, poor Whites still win.
36.24 poorest Whites, 37.16 richest Asians. That’s their best shot. The average Asian bumps into the dumbest White kid, the lowest range. With all our resources weaponized against us.
Suck on that, Yellow fever fags. At least the cucks for Blacks know there is a difference. I don’t think the Asians are going to over-take us any time soon, considering one of the most populous regions, India, still drinks water from the corpse-strewn Ganges.

The highest average, the highest range and the best poverty score (a good racial control)

-all belong to Whites.

Maths, motherfuckers.
Why point this out?

It was my privilege.


Remember while you’re punching down at Blacks, Whites still out-score loaded and likely cheating Asians.
Maybe you can make a pretty little Bell Curve outta that?

Always look for the tests the publishing academics can’t/won’t do.
You can shitpost with behavioural science because for some reason, differences offend the people praising diversity…
http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/diversity

You think the black scores are badthink? This isn’t the 80s, you are mainstream.

Nah, it’s the Asians nobody can dispute. Now that’s edgy!

Is that redpill stuck in Uranus? Is that why the butt doth hurt, fellow travelers?

Why choose LSAT? Well, it’s a high correlate to IQ.
I’m an equal opportunities gadfly.

Mixed race regression to the mean

Since the parents are each below-average to miscegenate according to studies, the average between them isn’t much to write home about.
Hybrid vigour is a myth in humans because of regression to the mean. I didn’t explain this adequately in my hybrid vigour post because I assumed it was obvious statistics, 101.
This applies to any metric and within the same race too, it’s just that the differences inter-racially are more depressing, genetically and literally. IQ, height, blood type, psychiatric risk, cancer risk, menarche, gestation time, forensic facial architecture, lifespan all vary between races. This isn’t good for mixed children than it would have been for the child of the healthier parent with another person of similar health (intraracial). I cover a health study with psychiatric implications lower down.

Galton came up with ‘regression to the mean’ and you can see it here.

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/12/a-mediocre-mans-great-son-a-great-mans-mediocre-son/
“What is more curious is how this related to the reality of regression toward the mean. This is a very general statistical concept, but for our purposes we’re curious about its application in quantitative genetics. People often misunderstand the idea from what I can tell, and treat it as if there is an orthogenetic-like tendency of generations to regress back toward some idealized value.”

Remember, geniuses tend to have ordinary children and genius can spring from ordinary parents.
It’s easy to see regression in supermodels. Plain parents, the children of supermodels rarely match their parents, let alone exceed them.
Most mutations are bad. Each child is a petri dish of half their parents.

“So how does it work? A few years ago a friend told me that the best way to think about it was a bivariate distribution, where the two random variables are additive genetic variation and environmental genetic variation. Clearer? For many, probably not. To make it concrete, let’s go back to the old standby: the quantitative genetics of height…..”

Mostly genetic, the ‘nurture’ are epigenetic effects we don’t yet understand e.g. nutrition, less back-breaking work.

This is where many people get confused (frankly, those whose intelligence is somewhat closer to the mean!). They presume that a subsequent generation of mating would result in further regression back to the mean. No! Rather, the expected value of the offspring would be 0.16 units. Why?
Because through the process of selection you’ve created a new genetic population. The selection process is imperfect in ascertaining the exact causal underpinning of the trait value of a given individual. In other words, because height is imperfectly heritable some of the tall individuals you select are going to be tall for environmental reasons, and will not pass that trait to heir offspring. But height is ~80% heritable, which means that the filtering process of genes by using phenotype is going to be rather good, and the genetic makeup of the subsequent population will be somewhat deviated from the original parental population. In other words, the reference population to which individuals “regress” has now changed. The environmental variation remains, but the additive genetic component around which the regression is anchored is now no longer the same.
This is why I state that regression toward the mean is not magical in a biological sense. There is no population with fixed traits to which selected individuals naturally regress or revert to. Rather, populations are useful abstractions in making sense of the statistical correlations we see around us. The process of selection is informed by population-wide trends, so we need to bracket a set of individuals as a population. But what we really care about are the genetic variables which underpin the variation across the population. And those variables can change rather easily through selection. Obviously regression toward the mean would be exhibit the magical reversion-toward-ideal-type property that some imagine if the variables were static and unchanging. But if this was the matter of things, then evolution by natural selection would never occur!”

But IQ is depressed by mutation load, when they talk of ‘cognitive performance’. That’s why geniuses don’t tend to have genius children, and no, well-educated is not a proxy. Chimps can pass tests.

Steve describes regression to the mean in IQ well here.
isteve.blogspot.com/2013/01/regression-toward-mean-and-iq.html

Here’s a 2-minute clip of a professor explaining it.

http://www.unz.com/jman/regression-to-the-mean/

https://humanvarieties.org/2013/04/18/iq-regression-to-the-mean-the-genetic-prediction-vindicated/
“What kind of luck explains the fact that the children of high-IQ parents have lower IQs while they are reared in cognitive stimulating environments, when the children of low-IQ parents who were raised in chaotic environments still have higher IQs than their parents ? The IQs regress halfway (50%) to the population mean at both sides of the IQ distribution. If we stick to the Dickens-Flynn model (2001) of feedback loops, one would expect that children of high-IQ parents have higher IQ and children of low-IQ parents an IQ even lower. But the opposite happens. This criticism, in the end, does not provide any explanation for the fact that the regression is homogeneous across the different levels of IQ. As Jensen made it clear, the IQ subgroups do not depart from linearity for an IQ range going from 50 to 150.
While some say that regression to the mean occurs because of some kind of (random) measurement errors, it should be noted that IQ regression to the mean analyses are usually performed by using the method of estimated true scores, that is, IQ scores corrected for measurement error, or unreliability, with the formula :…”

Rushton brings in r/K theory here
http://philipperushton.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/iq-race-bell-curve-r-k-theory-rushton-intelligence-political-inequality-public-policy-1997.pdf
since this mating strategy also differs between race in probability, as much as individuals.
See the number of ‘single mothers’ for irrefutable proof. Domestic violence, rape by race etc.

From The Scientific Study of General Intelligence
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=rPNFXBnwuNoC&pg=PA176&lpg=PA176&dq=regression+to+the+mean+mixed+race&source=bl&ots=7MSkcTp6I1&sig=9ARvUoujsiIORB0BN-ljodWC3Ls&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjwzaDe-73UAhXpJcAKHdzaCTYQ6AEIajAM#v=onepage&q=regression%20to%20the%20mean%20mixed%20race&f=false
“4.7 Blacks and Whites regress toward their predicted racial means”
Scientifically, you’d expect this.
Statistically. As it goes on to say “no culture-only theory predicts these results.”
4.8 details rate of maturation between White, Asian and Black babies. This clearly includes the brain and does impact IQ means.
Black men also average more testosterone, which does explain the rape rates of Africa somewhat and doesn’t form a defense. Black women have it higher too, never seen a feminine jawline on one.
Whites form the medium group, we’re Goldilocks on a lot of this.
“for each characteristic, the mixed race mean fell between…”
As in, not superior than either parent. EITHER parent.
A meta-analysis in Nature back in 2015 with an overly-broad pool prone to Replicability Crisis is not a new study. Height is not a fine metric, it’s too masculine, lung capacity is too specific and ‘cognitive ability’ avoids IQ, the gold and only standard of ‘g’. It doesn’t control adequately for education (see Tiger Moms for how much crazy dominance that can be).

It’s grotesquely unfair to hold these children, already doomed in the dating world, to standards neither of their parents could meet! Is that level of control not child abuse?
https://lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/mixed-race-kids.pdf
I do sympathize with them, it is a plight because they never chose their situation, their terrible, awful parents did.
“As one might expect, on a host of background and achievement characteristics, mixed race kids fall in between whites and blacks…” and they are more antisocial than expected too. They don’t study psychiatric conditions to explain this, as they do with whites.

PubMed published “Health and behavior risks of adolescents with mixed-race identity” which nudges closer.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/
Guess the result.
“Most studies are based on clinical reports or reports of mixed-race samples without comparison to single-race groups. It is not surprising that such samples lead to the conclusion of emotional and behavior problems, as clinical samples are self-selected for problems. No national data on adolescents have been reported, except from the sample we used.”
Table 2 is useful: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/table/t2/
“…Mixed-race Whites and Asians show significantly greater risk for considering suicide, having sex, repeating a grade, and being suspended. Support for the hypothesis of greater risk status of mixed race compared with single race is most strongly supported for general health, supported for substance use…”
Ouch, guess Yellow Fever has a toll too.
Pay up.
Table 3 is specfic to combinations of race: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/table/t3/

“These analyses answer the question of whether mixed-race-identified adolescents are at higher risk than single-race-identified adolescents. .. Therefore, the overall inference from the controlled analysis is that the differences between single-race and mixed-race identifiers on the control variables we introduced are not the source of the higher risk encountered by mixed-race adolescents.”
“Previous analyses in this article have been limited to health and behavior risk variables. We examined a set of variables measuring individual and family characteristics that are not in and of themselves health and behavior risk variables, i.e., they are not attitudes, voluntary behaviors, or health symptoms. We offer 4 comparisons (family education, family structure, GPA, and PVT), each of them correlated with socioeconomic status. GPA is a measure of success in school. The PVT is highly correlated with success in school and is correlated with general intelligence tests. Because single-race respondents differ by race on these variables,”

trans. Different races are different.

“it is possible that single-race respondents also differ from mixed-race respondents on the same variables. These measures are all considered here as not caused by personal motivations, decisions, or actions with respect to family structure, family education, and PVT, and at least partially for GPA. They represent cultural opportunities and cultural handicaps. Mixed-race adolescents may be supposed to have had exposure to the cultural fates of 2 racial groups. They may therefore be hypothesized to be between the 2 racial groups with which they identify on such attributes.”

Ding ding ding regression to the mean!

“The general pattern of these nonrisk attributes is that the mixed-race groups have values that are between the values of the 2 constituent races. This lends support to the hypothesis that the mixed-race adolescents have been influenced by both racial groups and, therefore, have an experience that is between those who report the single constituent races.”

The discussion opens:

The preponderance of our evidence supports the conclusion that adolescents who identify more than 1 race are at higher health and behavior risks when compared with those who identify with 1 race only. This applies in a general way and is not distinctive to any particular race combinations. Further, it is not peculiar to any particular type of risk, but to most risks, both health and behavior.
Because risk among mixed-race adolescents is higher for all race combinations, some across-the-board explanation must be inferred….”

Did you guess nurture? They blame nurture.

so we may therefore choose to interpret mixed race as a source of stress. We cannot identify further the source of the stress. Subsequent research can start with the assumption of greater risk for the mixed-race-identified adolescent and try to identify the sources of stress. Only then can we recommend programmatic attention to mixed-race youths.”

Who wants to subject their offspring to that by choice?

What kind of atrocious parents would choose this?

…Isn’t stress biological?

Brazil can openly study it, thanks to demographic necessity.
Historical paper.
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0102-01882016000200107&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en
“In Latin America it was possible to study the negative effects of racial mixing…” – LC Brito, 2016.

Funny story.
Reports about the daughters of white abolitionists marrying blacks in the north were very common in the Southern press. An example was the marriage of Sarah Judson, whose story was published in the newspaper Memphis Daily Appeal in 1859 and according to the author, “would turn the stomach of any white.” The bride, daughter of a “radical abolitionist,” was induced by her father to marry a black man “against the designs of nature.”4″

and the origin of the word ‘miscegenation’:

The Democrats thus used a strategy to link once and for all the image of President Lincoln to the practice of amalgamation. In the heat of the electoral campaign, two democratic journalists, David Goodman Croly and George Wakeman, used a pamphlet called “Miscegenation: the theory of racial mixing applied to the white American man and the black.” The leaflet was false, and the intention of the authors, then anonymous, was to leave the impression of that it had been written by radical Republican abolitionists, supporters of Lincoln and inter-racial marriage. The text had a great repercussion in the North, where the majority of the president’s voters were based, affecting public opinion terrorized by the ideas defended in the pamphlet, which promoted racial mixing as something practiced among the most advanced nations of the world.

The text also pointed to people of mixed race as being the people of the future, a vision not very common in the United States, affirming that mixed races were superior and thereby opposed to the central justification of white superiority: racial purity (Lemire, 2002, p. 116; Fredrickson, 1971, pp. 171-174).

The pamphlet created the term miscegenation, which from then on would be used to designate mixing between people from different races. “

The propaganda has been in effect for a long time.

“The use of Latin America can be perceived in the section “Superiority of the mixed races.” Here the authors stated that the mixed races were mentally, physically, and morally superior to the pure race which had not mixed, and mentioned the example of the sambos in South America, descendants of blacks and Indians. Once again, Brazil was cited as an example of a country where the people were miscegenated, collaborating with the consolidation of the idea of mixing in the country.”

This 1860 clip from a newspaper is timely.

“Unfortunately, the Brazilian constitution considers all men equal if they are free, whether they are black men or white men. The effects of the equality of these laws do not need demonstration. This has plunged Brazil into a political revolution which has been destroying the Imperial government and its army, the majority of which is composed of blacks who will shortly dictate the terms of emancipation to the nation and the Empire will be converted into another Venezuela.”

Venezuela is currently eating their pets.

Anyway…

“Opposing the thesis of the degeneration of mulattos, the author stated that individuals of a biracial origin also could serve as an intermediate class which could reduce possible racial tensions, as had occurred in Haiti.12″

Serve?

Footnote

“According to the Webster Dictionary (1828), the term mongrel is defined as “of mixed breed, of different kinds, animal of mixed breed.” The word is associated with mingle which according to the same dictionary means ‘mixing’ and also ‘promiscuity.'”

Without specialization, a bereft quality.

You can search that site by subject but this is the only paper I found on ‘racial mixing’. I did try. Moving on…

I need to collate more data on the products of miscegenetion but the data is rarely collected, honestly interpreted and
published openly. The results don’t fit the Narrative.
There are places you can look but they’re too broad in my judgement, and miss fine-grain studies like the Asian myopia risk, based in precise genetic strains.

en.metapedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_race_mixing

http://www.deathofcommunism.josru.com/effects-of-race-mixing

On psychiatric risk,
http://www.sec-ed.co.uk/news/mixed-race-children-at-greater-risk-of-mental-health-issues
whitegenocideproject.com/study-mixed-race-people-have-identity-problems/
https://www.unc.edu/news/archives/oct03/udry10302003.html

They can’t ask for taxpayer money without admitting there’s a problem.

They tend to exclude the biracial from studies because it leads to inconvenient questions.
Example
http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/abs/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.7.1336
They must care so much.

Social outcomes suffer as well.