“Asian women are more traditional”

Biggest ‘sex trade’ globally is a funny definition, mate.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_trafficking_in_Southeast_Asia

They literally sell their own daughters.

Thankfully, Asiaphiles don’t breed at replacement level. We’re safe.

Race traitors in general rarely have grandkids either. Feature, not a bug.

Investment: 100%

Yield: 0%

I just wanted an excuse to post this song. It pops into my head whenever I see a weeb talking.

….breathing.

Link: mixed race marriage and biological problems

http://sociobiologicalmusings.blogspot.com/2011/10/problems-with-mixed-race-marriages-and.html

Parents do not give equal shares of genes to their child, this is a myth.

The party with more recessive genes e.g. white, will be less than 50% of a genetic parent to their mixed child.

“In evolutionary terms, one could argue that mixed-race marriages are maladaptive in that they reduce a person’s overall genetic fitness – i.e. passing on copies of one’s own genes.  In a multiracial marriage or relationship, one is showing altruism toward a partner who shares fewer genes than a co-ethnic would share.  A parent will also share fewer genes with a multiracial child than with a same-race child.”

Study the in/fertility of the mixed kids, that’s also a doozy.

If it’s well known their organs don’t work properly, that includes the gonads.

Cavalli-Sforza’s team compiled extraordinary tables depicting the “genetic distances” separating 2,000 different racial groups from each other. For example, assume the genetic distance between the English and the Danes is equal to 1.0. Then, Cavalli-Sforza has found, the separation between the English and the Italians would be about 2.5 times as large as the English-Danish difference. On this scale, the Iranians would be 9 times more distant genetically from the English than the Danish, and the Japanese 59 times greater. Finally, the gap between the English and the Bantus (the main group of sub-Saharan blacks) is 109 times as large as the distance between the English and the Danish.”

Hey sub-race, they still won’t discuss you.

Using the genetic distances outlined above, let’s look at two hypothetical multiracial marriages.

An English Man and a Japanese Woman:  As genetic distance figures above note, an English man would be around 59 times more closely related to a Dane than to his Japanese wife. 

aka the joke in this

Why would you willingly take on a genetic disability, to be trendy?

Bloody anti-white cucks. Well, at least they impair their own idiotic genetics.

Regarding the individual’s genetic investment in the second example above, Frank Salter (On Genetic Interests, pg. 261) writes:

“For a person of English ethnicity, choosing an English spouse over a Dane gains less than one percent fitness. But choosing an English spouse over a Bantu, one yields a fitness gain of 92 percent….  The same applies in reverse order, so that a Bantu who chooses another Bantu instead of someone of English ethnicity has 92% more of his or her genes in offspring as a result.  It is almost the equivalent to having twice the number of children with an English spouse.

Genetic preservation, also to be encouraged in other races.

If you want to annoy a Europhile, point out they’re pushing for the preservation of the white race.

Thus assortative mating by ethnicity can have large fitness benefits, the largest derived from choosing mates within geographic races.”

In other words and general terms, a white mother will be almost as twice as closely related to a child with a white father versus a child with a black father.  Because same-race parents share more genes,  each parent is likely to see more of his or her genes in the offspring even if they are not passed on directly.  For example, if the father has gene X and doesn’t pass it on directly to his son, there’s a good chance his same-race spouse will have gene X and pass it on, so the son will indirectly possess the father’s gene X.

Noting phenotype in mixed-race children, each parent would more closely resemble co-ethnics than their own child, especially the white mother, since whites tend to have recessive traits for appearance.  (A person only 1/16 black will often still have visible and prominent black features.)

And appearance does matter.  The fact that mixed-race children do not resemble the parents, esp. the fairer parent, seems to be an issue of concern, although not widely discussed.

Hey, you wanted attention. You got it.

it is unsurprising that mixed-race children suffer more problems of identity and health.  For instance, mixed-race people are less likely to survive organ transplants, especially bone marrow transplants.  In general, mixed-race people have more health problems. A study by J. Richard Udry notes:

“A new study that involved surveying 90,000 adolescent U.S. students showed that those who considered themselves to be of mixed race were more likely than others to suffer from depression, substance abuse, sleep problems and various aches and pains. Conducted by researchers at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the National Institutes of Health, the investigation found that adolescents of mixed race were more likely to have other health problems as well.”

It’s child abuse, if we’re honest.

For the parent’s fetish or vanity.

In other words, an argument could be made that mixed-race families are maladaptive — both for the parents and the children  — and undermine one’s genetic interests.

Hybrid weakness, it seems.

Mixed race divorce and domestic abuse

I’m back. I decided to qualify the end of the last post. For shiggles.
Yes, there is data. I’m cracking down hard on the weebs.

“Marital Dissolution Among Inter-racial Couples”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4183451/

“Increases in interracial marriage have been interpreted as reflecting reduced social distance among racial and ethnic groups, but little is known about the stability of interracial marriages. Using six panels of Survey of Income and Program Participation (N = 23,139 married couples), we found that interracial marriages are less stable than endogamous marriages, but these findings did not hold up consistently. After controlling for couple characteristics, the risk of divorce or separation among interracial couples was similar to the more-divorce-prone origin group. Although marital dissolution was found to be strongly associated with race/ethnicity, the results failed to provide evidence that interracial marriage is associated with an elevated risk of marital dissolution.”

This is like saying cars don’t kill people, brakes do.

“As the U.S. population has grown increasingly diverse, it is important to update prior research to include interracial marriages involving Asians and Hispanics, especially given that they are more likely to intermarry (with non-Hispanic Whites) than are Blacks”

so if you’re so concerned about race, screeching at the weebs is your duty. Mudsharks already hate themselves. Asiaphiles are oddly proud of it.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=asiaphile
“The term applies to a non-Asian person particularly a white man who has yellow fever. Thinks all Asian chicks are hot, usually can’t tell the difference between a homely and a cute one just as long as she is Asian.”

I’ve posted about that before. Dick-blind.

It’s the baby prostitute of Mean Girls fame!

Thousands of years of evolution down the drain. Bet his WW2-fighting grandparents would be proud.

“In their study of multiracial identification among those with Black, Asian, or Hispanic backgrounds, Lee and Bean (2007) found that those with Black backgrounds more consistently identified as Black and not multiracial (similar to the “one-drop” rule as applied in the past), whereas those with Hispanic and, especially, Asian backgrounds exhibited more flexibility and choice in racial/ethnic identification and were more likely to identify as multiracial. Lee and Bean (2007) concluded that these patterns illustrated the salience of the color line that continues to divide Blacks from non-Blacks in U.S. society.”

So the existential risk to team white is team yellow.
If you’re being scientific.

“The homogamy perspective predicts that interracial marriages will be less stable than same-race marriages. Thus, Black-White marriages are expected to be more likely to divorce than either Black or White endogamous marriages; similarly, Asian-White marriages are expected to be more likely to divorce than either Asian or White endogamous marriages. The homogamy perspective further leads to the expectation that the stronger the racial boundary of the two groups represented in the couple, the greater the risk of divorce. Thus, Black-White marriages are expected to be at greater risk of divorce than Hispanic-White or Asian-White marriages.”

Although there is a speculated convergence (I’d guess once you control for class/money) that is similar to mixed race IQ being the mean of both sub-par parents (and so dragged lower).

“For example, he found that Chinese-White couple divorce rates fell somewhere in between divorce rates of Chinese and White endogamous marriages.”
“Similarly, Hispanic-White and Asian-White marriages would be expected to be more likely to dissolve than Hispanic or Asian endogamous marriages but less likely than White endogamous marriages”

But that hypothesis isn’t what actually happens and it’d be a more dramatic shift if you removed the religious couples from consideration, only counting those who could be allowed to divorce.

Atheists are more likely to divorce overall, but it’s hard to find studies.
Are they more likely to race mix? Probably.

OT

“Therefore, according to the ethnic convergence hypothesis, immigrant-native marriages would be expected to have divorce risks that fall between those of immigrant-immigrant marriages and native-native marriages. Also, if Hispanic and Asian interracial marriages are less likely to divorce, this could be because so many of these marriages involve immigrants. After controlling for immigration characteristics, the effects of interracial marriage should diminish for these couples”

Another thing to control, desperation to retain citizenship.

“To assess the homogamy and ethnic convergence hypotheses, it is important to control for correlated factors. Individual-level socioeconomic and demographic characteristics are associated with interracial marriage and are important predictors of divorce.”

Gold diggers gonna dig.

“Finally, while having young child(ren) has been shown to increase marital stability, this effect often decreased as the child(ren) grew older (Cherlin, 1977).”

Babies won’t protect you (actually they stress a marriage, especially if had too soon).

“In addition to the socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of individuals, it is critical to control for couple-level characteristics.”

Dare you to count 10-score sexual attractiveness compared to their in-group.

That would burn.

“The homogamy perspective stresses that partner differences in any socially significant characteristics—not just race—may increase the risk of divorce, and spouses in interracial couples may differ on multiple characteristics. For example, Tucker and Mitchell-Kernan (1990) found that the age gap was larger for interracially married couples than other couples. Partners in interracial couples may also differ with respect to nativity and citizenship. Interracial marriages between immigrants and U.S.-born natives may be at greater risk of divorce because of partner differences in their reasons for entering the relationship.

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Prostitution is a reason.

Kalmijn et al. (2005) found that larger cultural differences between the husband and wife increased the risk of divorce.

Breaking news: water, wet.

In addition, marriage to U.S. citizens may serve as a legal means to immigrate for many foreigners.

For that reason, no, it isn’t legal, and the other spouse has also broken the law by using that to gain power too. Technically the marriage wouldn’t count, since it was conditional as duress to defraud their nation (so also treason).

Such marriages may be motivated by the desire to obtain U.S. citizenship rather than love or companionship, as evidenced in many cases in France (Neyrand & M’Sili, 1998) and the Netherlands (Kalmijn et al., 2005).”

I ain’t sayin’ she a gold digger.. but she reaching for that green card n—er.

“Finally, group-level characteristics, such as marriage cohort, region of residence, religion, and women’s changing status, may be associated with divorce or separation (Trent & South, 1989). For example, interracial marriage has been more prevalent in the West than other parts of the country (Tucker & Mitchell-Kernan, 1990), and marital instability has been more common in the West than other regions, although this relationship has varied by race (Sweeney & Phillips, 2004) and has weakened over the years (Castro Martin & Bumpass, 1989).”

Because less get married in the first place!

The majority (93.5%) of the couples in our sample were endogamous, including 77.4% White-White, 6.4% Black-Black, 7% Hispanic-Hispanic, and 2.7% Asian-Asian couples. The remaining 6.5% of couples were interracially married (including 1% White-Black, 3.5% White-Hispanic, and 1.4% White-Asian pairings, as well as 0.6% of all types of minority-minority marriages combined).

There are far more total Asian-White couples than White-Black, if you’re going to criticize anyone.

1% mulatto vs. 4.9% genetic Asian admixture. Who’s the, ahem, “race traitor?”

Consistent with prior studies (e.g., Qian, 1997), there are distinct racial/ethnic differences in being in an interracial marriage (results not shown). Blacks are substantially less likely than Hispanics or Asians to have a White spouse (10.1% vs. 23.5% and 24.6%, respectively).”

Africans aren’t stealing da white wimmin.

Statistically. This isn’t the 19th century. Your assumptions are outdated.

Over one third of interracial couples (34.5%) involved a foreign-born person married to a U.S. native compared with just 4.2% of endogamous couples.”

Yeah. She a gold digger.
Isn’t that slave ownership?

Most slaves are sex slaves.
Made obvious in the final study here. What happens when a slave gets out of line?

“Consistent with the first homogamy hypothesis, interracial marriages are less stable: 13.7% of interracial couples compared with 9.9% of endogamous couples broke up during their SIPP panel.”

Duh.

“The descriptive results also confirm the second homogamy hypothesis in which mixed-race couples involving the most socially distant groups (e.g., Blacks and Whites) were most likely to break up: nearly 20% of Black-White couples divorced or separated compared with 13.5% of Hispanic-White couples and 8.4% of Asian-White couples.”

Hispanics are genetic Asian, that data is rigged.

Total Asian-White divorce should be 10.95%.

They should also break down by sex, so Asian Male, White Female or White Male, Asian Female for specific divorce risk per individual by demo.
If they controlled for IQ distance between the couples, that’d explain most of the divorce. Hard to steer a marriage when one party is pedaling backwards.

“For Asians, however, the results were consistent with the ethnic convergence hypothesis”

No you tortured the statistics into excluding most of the Asian population in America.
Shell games don’t impress me.

“Roughly 8.3% of Asian-White couples separated or divorced, a level that falls between the relatively high rates for White couples and the relatively low rates among Asian couples (1.4%).”

You said 8.4 earlier.

8.4/1.4 = 6x (times) the average intra-racial Asian divorce risk thanks to Asian-European miscegenation?
And they think that’s a good finding. Don’t piss down my back and tell me it’s raining Zhang.

So this isn’t even good for the Asians with white fever. Since they’re marrying the dregs. They can’t even say it’s better for waifu.

“This may be a consequence of potential problems facing interracial couples including stress, social disapproval, and cultural differences. Furthermore, interracial couples differ from endogamous couples in important ways that may elevate the risk of divorce (such as greater age and education differences between spouses). To test this idea, we turn next to the multivariate hazards models.”

Nothing about racism and the urge to control, how weird.

Almost like they’re encouraging mixing whatever the cost.

“In general, younger age of first marriage, age and educational differences among the spouses (particularly when the husband is more than two years younger or less educated than the wife); lower levels of education (less than college); lower income; and having no or fewer young children were significantly associated with marital instability.”

So lower quality individuals choose to mix.
Groundbreaking.
Stupidity, poverty, atheist fertility predict their divorce (and decision to have wed in the first place).

“Interracial couples tend to have higher incomes and older ages at marriage (both of which are associated with lower rates of dissolution), so these characteristics cannot explain their higher levels of divorce or separation.”

I smell bullshit.
If they wed, bed and divorce like idiots…
could they be idiots? Why u no publish IQ data?

“Although, mixed marriages are also more likely to involve larger differences in age and education between spouses (consistent with the first homogamy hypothesis), which could partially explain their higher risks of marital dissolution.”

There we go.
Backpedal central.

Almost like marrying a virtual child (age gap) is unpleasant, too.

“Unexpectedly, however, the addition of controls for nativity/citizenship status did not alter the hazard ratio associated with interracial marriage.”

Huh.

“Thus far, the results support the first homogamy hypothesis, though the support was rather weak.”

Despite your best efforts to obscure it? Sure Zhang.

Interracial marriage was positively associated with marital dissolution net of couple characteristics, but this relationship was only marginally significant (p < .10).”

Still science.

“We presented the hazard ratios for race/ethnicity only, although the full models are available to interested readers upon request.”

What cover-up?

For a laugh:


All four hazard models.

“Nevertheless, the results were consistent with the second homogamy hypothesis in that the risk of marital dissolution was highest among Black-White couples, followed by Hispanic-White, minority-minority couples, and finally, Asian-White couples.”

Kek.

“Among Asians, the hazard of divorce or separation for interracial couples fell between that of Asian and White endogamous couples but the difference from White couples was not significant, thus failing to fully support Hypothesis 4. We had also hypothesized that nativity and citizenship between spouses of Hispanic and Asian interracial couples may help explain their higher risks of marital dissolution (Hypothesis 5). This idea was not fully supported because interracial marriages involving Hispanics or Asians did not experience elevated hazards of dissolution (so there were no significant differences to explain). Nevertheless, nativity and citizenship did help explain the relatively low risks of instability among Hispanic and Asian endogamous couples. When we added controls for nativity and citizenship in Model 4, the hazards for Hispanic and Asian endogamous couples increased, thereby narrowing the difference from both White couples and interracial couples. In fact, the difference between Hispanic-White and Hispanic-Hispanic couples became insignificant after controlling for citizenship and nativity in Model 4”

In short, when Trump lets the waifus out and relieves them of their fraudulent green cards, expect a lot of divorce.
MAGA.

Then again… there are other kinks to iron out.

“Among Hispanic-White couples, Hispanic husband-White wife were no more likely to dissolve than White or Hispanic endogamous couples.”

You see why religion must be controlled for.

“The contribution of this study is that it examines the instability of interracial marriage among Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians in contemporary American society, an era marked by increasing diversity and increasing prevalence of interracial marriage. Overall, although marital dissolution was found to be strongly associated with race/ethnicity, the results failed to provide evidence that interracial marriage per se is associated with an elevated risk of marital dissolution. “

No, you failed to provide evidence. You.
Shit methodology, son.

Our results do show that, on the whole, interracial marriages are less stable than endogamous marriages, even after controlling for couple characteristics.”

Uhuh.

“When we divided the results by race/ethnicity, the results were only partially consistent with the homogamy perspective.”

Despite your best efforts to minimize, consistent.
They should also study second-generation race-mixing, since the mixed tend only to reproduce with one another.

“Rather, the most consistent result was that the risks of divorce for interracial couples for all combinations (Black-White, Hispanic-White, and Asian-White) were not significantly different from those of the higher-risk origin group.”

That’s still divorce. More divorce. Quit trying to spin it.

“Even after pooling six SIPP panels together, the number of interracial couples was small, which may have contributed to the insignificant findings.”

True.

They are very abnormal, Hollywood lies.

“In our study, the effects of certain racial/ethnic combinations were similar for both men and women once controls were introduced into the models (e.g., among Asians and Hispanics).”

Appealing to “alpha” won’t work on this one.

Now for another paper I’m sure cannot be biased by one “Choi”…

Race mixing and re-marriage.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5300087/

Plot twist: The modern mudshark is a statistically divorced man remarrying Asian.

I wonder why they never mention this.

“The two most frequently crossed boundaries – those involving White-Asian and White-Hispanic couples – are more permeable in remarriages than in first marriages. Boundaries that are crossed with less frequency – those between minority groups and the White-Black boundary-are less permeable in remarriages than in first marriages. Collectively, these findings suggest that racial and ethnic sorting processes in remarriage may reify existing social distances between pan-ethnic groups. Racial and ethnic variations in how the relative permeability of boundary changes between first and higher-order marriages underscore the importance of considering a broad array of interracial pairings when assessing the ways in which changes in family structure and marital sorting behavior promote integration.”

Promote integration…

From the male (decision) side:

So white men are the race traitors.
Interesting.

White genocide, blame Yellow Fever.

Statistically.

“Tabular results also reveal that for Hispanic and Asian women, intermarriage rates are higher in remarriages than in first marriages. One-third of Asian women wed non-Asian men in their first marriage, but over half did so in remarriage”

Because they couldn’t get a white woman (again).

Hit that Wall hard, huh? Study adiposity, come on.

And it’s obvious white fever in the Asian’s case, a third!

It isn’t the race-mixing white women.
“Eight percent of White women cross ethno-racial boundaries in first marriage, as compared with 6 percent of White women who remarry.”
They seem to learn their lesson.

Table 4 shows the college brainwashing.
They definitely won’t spy on you.
“better-educated women are more likely than their educationally disadvantaged counterparts to cross racial and ethnic boundaries in marriage”
The women are brainwashed too. But it’s also seeking IQ parity, upper-class women typically went to college to find husbands, so more studies are needed and more white men allowed in the Western universities that are their birthright.

“It is conceivable that White-Hispanic and White-Asian marriages likely become even more common in remarriage when third party controls weaken following the dissolution of a first union

They ignore their family’s wishes, bad sons should be disinherited.

and previously married individuals face experience limited availability of co-ethnic potential partners (Kalmijn, 1998; Schwartz, 2013).”

LOL

Can’t get a white woman!

Right there! Ouch.

“Other scholarship claims that cultural dissimilarities between spouses increase marital conflict and instability by reducing the basis for spousal consensus and mutual understanding between spouses (Hohmann-Marriott and Amato, 2008; Kalmijn, 1998; Schwartz, 2013; Zhang and Van Hook, 2009).

resentment

Presumably, couples that exit minority-only interracial marriages avoid similar unions in remarriage, preferring instead to form remarry endogamously, to wed a White partner the next time around, or forego marriage entirely.”

Using white people, again. So the white people are also getting dregs in the arrangement.
It’s like the marital equivalent of busing kids in to improve test scores.

“Descriptive tabulations show that one-in-three women who remarried wed never-married husbands, but only one-in-ten first time brides wed previously married men.”

Yeah if he failed as a husband once, why bet on a lame horse?
He didn’t keep his vows the first time. What a catch! (Throw it back!)

“These analyses, which indicate whether in couples’ mixed marital experiences biased the estimates of boundary crossing in first and subsequent marriages, reaffirm the reported results.”

So in many mixed re-marriages, the previously married party is the dregs of their group.

“base the analyses on recent unions” K.

“Partly this resulted because many large government surveys, such as the decennial census, stopped collecting information about marital order.”

Because it makes men look bad.

“In the context of rising intermarriage and remarriage rates, our study underscores the importance of disaggregating marriage order to clarify whether, in what ways, and for which groups changes in coupling behavior promote integration. Collecting data that permits these distinctions is necessary to avoid conflating potentially divergent intermarriage trends in first and higher order unions, some of which are driven by racial and ethnic differences in divorce rates.”

Oh, they know.
Most starter marriages are male-led affairs, they think (wrongly, QED) they can always trade up later (not to be entered into lightly….) and abandoning wife #1 has no social consequences.
So re-marrying men are largely to blame for the huge divorce rates. Good to know.

This explains why they rarely make it male-led data.

“This pattern, which is consistent with past findings, suggests that low barriers to social interaction across racial and ethnic groups when coupled with suboptimal marriage market conditions and weakened third party control can facilitate interracial remarriages for these groups (Aguirre et al., 1995; Fu, 2010; Kalmijn, 1998; Schwartz, 2013).”

Random re-marriage should be illegal, it’s like flunking a driving test but serious. A society that lets adults (who should be mature enough to commit) re-marry capriciously like infinite respawns is condemning the culture, religion, spouses and children to the misery of an insecure life. What a betrayal.

They bitch about masculinity, when comes the manning-up? Men were respected when they stuck out their duties. Don’t take it on if you don’t mean it.

“Prior studies suggest that cultural dissimilarities between partners diminish grounds for spousal consensus, leading to conflictive, unstable marriages at high risk of dissolution (Hohmann-Marriott and Amato, 2008). In remarriage, previously married men and women from mixed-race unions may revise their mate criteria to avoid similar forms of partner incompatibility (Dean and Gurak, 1978).”

Except stupid white guys with yellow fever.
I wonder if they’re more likely porn addicts. That would be an entertaining study.

“Stated differently, intermarriage studies restricted to White-Black couples render an incomplete portrayal of mate selection behavior in the context of an ever more diverse society.”

They may not be getting married but they’re having more children than the white guys with Yellow Fever. It’s typical atheist sub-fertility so given the standard, limited dating patterns their grand-kids will be a quarter black.

“In similar fashion, although prior work shows that characteristics of spouses interact in shaping mate selection behavior (Fu, 2010), our data do not permit consideration of the joint distribution of spouses’ characteristics. We report analyses based on intermarriage patterns pegged to wives’ characteristics; however, auxiliary analyses based on husbands’ attributes yielded similar conclusions.”

Since the male proposes, it should be male-led data.
Look for r-selection traits and that’ll resolve most of it.

“How the mate selection behavior of widowed and divorced individuals is largely uncharted and certainly warrants investigation.”

Women are more likely to be widowed, men divorced, that’s why they don’t look for it – it makes the men look heartless.

“marriage confers legal rights and obligations, many of which are not extended to cohabiting couples (child support is a notable exception)”

It shouldn’t be, don’t have kids with someone you haven’t married first, or at least don’t expect the authority of a husband over a woman you didn’t yoke yourself to. If a man wants “his” kids so much, he should be taking primary care of them – not fobbing them off on a foreign nanny like some high-powered executive (daycare is abusive). The low IQ nanny normalization may be responsible for divorced children’s lower IQs.

“Specifically, racial and ethnic profile of former cohabiting partners are seldom recorded in US data suitable for analyzing inter-racial coupling behavior (e.g., ACS, Census, NSFG).”

coincidence

“The exclusion of interracial cohabitation will understate the extent to which couples cross ethnic and racial boundaries in forming co-residential interracial unions given that interracial unions are more likely than same-race unions to start and remain as a cohabitation (Kreider, 2000; Rodriguez-Garcia, 2015).”

Study separation.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3315595/

The variable nobody wants to discuss.

“Despite the growing number of interethnic marriages in the U.S., few studies have examined intimate partner violence (IPV) in interethnic couples. This article examined past-year occurrences of IPV across interethnic and intra-ethnic couples and tested correlates of IPV specifically in interethnic couples. Data were from a national survey of couples 18 years of age and older from the 48 contiguous states. Interethnic couples (n = 116) included partners from different ethnic backgrounds, including black-white, Hispanic-white, and black-Hispanic couples. White (n = 555), black (n = 358), and Hispanic (n = 527) intra-ethnic couples included partners with the same ethnicity. Data analyses were prevalence rates and logistic regressions. The analyses showed that interethnic couples were comparatively younger and had shorter relationships than intra-ethnic white, black, and Hispanic couples.

Male partners in interethnic couples had higher rates of binge drinking and alcohol problems compared to male partners in intra-ethnic couples.

So much for happy mixing. Stock photos lied to me?

Still no mention of racism, so a white male hitting a non-white is okay if you’re married to them? Surely it’s more racist to treat them like breeding sows and sexual concubines.

Past year prevalence rates for any occurrence of IPV and acts of severe IPV were higher for interethnic couples relative to intra-ethnic couples.

Why isn’t this mentioned in Sex Ed?

Most occurrences of IPV for interethnic couples were mutual.

Obedient waifu trope is a myth.

Factors predicting IPV among interethnic couples included marital status, couples’ age, male alcohol problems, and female impulsivity.

Mounting evidence points to interethnic couples as a high risk group for IPV.

Why aren’t there PSAs?

Interethnic couples may be at greater risk for IPV because of their younger age, binge drinking and alcohol problems.

You can’t blame the drink. They drink to have an excuse.

Future research could build on this study by examining cohort effects and regional differences in IPV for interethnic couples, and the risk for IPV across interethnic couples of different ethnic compositions.”

Note: no (non-Hispanic) Asian-White data in this one tested. Hmm.

However, found this:

“Fusco (2010) used county police reports to examine interethnic and intra-ethnic couple differences in IPV for a more diverse community sample of whites, blacks, Asians, and Hispanics. Interethnic couples were more likely than intra-ethnic minority and white couples to have a prior history of IPV and to experience mutual IPV in which both partners were determined by police to be equally involved in perpetrating violence.

No world for submissive waifu.

I guess that’s what happens when you marry someone with higher T than yourself (those manjaws).

White women don’t look like such bitches now, huh?

Victims of IPV in interethnic couples were also at greater risk of being injured during the violence when compared to intra-ethnic couples.

Wages of sin?

Logically, you wouldn’t hold back with the out-group. It’s unconscious.

Diversity + Proximity = Domestic violence, in this case.

This may suggest that interethnic couples engage in more severe acts of partner violence relative to intra-ethnic couples, although Fusco (2010) did not specifically examine partner violence severity.

Wonder why.

So the white guys really do hate their waifu, deep down.
And the Asian woman does hit back (unlike whites).
Why don’t the MRAs ever mention this? Their mutual violence trope is racial, not sexual!

“Couples that included Asian partners or partners from ‘other’ ethnicities (n = 43) were also excluded due to their small sample size in the dataset.”

convenient, considering

For example, white-Asian marriages make up a large percentage of interethnic marriages (Hattery, 2009), but we were not able to include them in this study due to the small number of Asians surveyed.”

I smell bullshit. So they abuse one another but they don’t talk. To save face.

Enough for now. I’ve proven my point.

Inter-racial fertility

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00521.x

“Alternatively, opposition to the relationship from the couple’s family and friends may reduce fertility.”
Nice excuse, shame fertility is biological.

“Interracial and interethnic partnering do not affect fertility for cohabiting, Black‐White, Mexican‐White, and Puerto Rican‐White intermarried couples, but it does reduce fertility in Chinese‐White and Asian Indian‐White intermarriages.”

So much for your Eurasian master race, eh?

Does their atheism have anything to do with this?

Or should that be….

Take comfort in the fact there will be more half-black kids for your half-Asian kids to date!

Hybrid vigour, right goys?

Spot the cuckface

What propaganda, they cry!

What propaganda?

You’re falling for it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interracial_marriage_in_the_United_States#Asian_and_White

Either you’re fine with all those pictures or none of them.

The “fuck you white Mom!” to the mudshark’s “FU white Dad!”

The last photo was linked on 4chan, where they/bots showed they hate white genocide, unless it’s non-Muslim non-Hindu Asians slowly absorbing White people.

http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/120340796/
“As a white guy that has fucked a lot of Asian puss, fuck this shit. Asian women are on this Earth to be used as sex toys for white men, not for having halfu babies. No Asian woman can match up to a half decent white girl. You hose off all the make-up and get down to their real personality, and Asian women are definitely genetic garbage only good for their holes. If you are going to throw your genes away, at least do it with a Jap, the only naturally beautiful pale Asians.”
White women don’t want you tho….?

This reality post

 

And this one.
Whew.

 

Brutal post. This is a sample.

I’m not even saying anything to these. You already know.

“WHITE MEN GET UGLY ASIAN
DEAL WITH IT”
Irrefutable, at best the participants look passable e.g. this guy, who can do at least three times better.

It’s the baby prostitute of Mean Girls fame!

If you’re gonna, at least only date a hot one?

When a subpar non-white woman (she’s like an Asian 3 dude, 4 tops) with the body of a child tries to dress like a top-tier white woman, they always look like a hooker. You are not Ava Gardner, stop. Drink it in and weep.

They know any acceptable looking guys in these unions come out as gay later, right? Assuming it isn’t secretly a man.


Guess how these guys and their kids would vote?
“So a poor white man (like my father) marries an Asian woman because she’s easier – as long as you’re white and are able to provide what she wants” Sounds more like a prostitute arrangement since it’s about money. Whatever happened to for richer, for poorer? They aren’t traditional at all, they’re larping.

“Don’t get me wrong, I’ve fucked a ton of slanters and had a great time of it, they were all beautiful. But having babies with one? Bitch please. There is nothing in Asia that comes close to pic related. Not the smell, the taste, the voice, or the look in her eyes.”

This is 4chan.

Asians taking over London is a problem only when it’s the likes of Sadiq Khan apparently.

Why do White guys date only ugly Asian girls?
I am an Asian, and I’ve seen lot’s of White male/Asian female couples both in Asia and the West.
But 99% of the time, they are with some real ugly chubby shorty unattractive Asian female which most Asian men don’t even bother to look at.
I am really surprised because I myself find White girls more attractive than Asian girls, and yet, the White dudes are dating 1s/10 or 2s/10 Asian girls. How can this be?
Do they have totally different taste?
99.9% attractive Asian girls are with Asian males, and 99% of Asian girls with White guys are unattractive.
And massive number of ugly unattractive Asian girls are flocking to the West to get a White boyfriend, while attractive ones stay in Asia being well treated by their Asian boyfriends.
I guess white guys are just more tolerant when dating an unattractive ones.”

They don’t know or care but expect the rest of us to never notice or comment.
They might cry racism!

“The geeky white guys think they’ve hit the jackpot when they meet these Asian girls, but spend a long enough time in Asia and you’ll begin to realize they’re not as hot as you first thought. I regularly see ugly white guys walking around proudly with below average Asian girls… as well as good looking white guys with ugly Asian.”

I once heard from a European man who refused to date an Asian woman: No pussy is better than embarrassing pussy.

These guys really cannot tell.

“In short: I am the son of a foreign born Asian woman from Hong Kong who deliberately married a tall, red-haired, blue eyed, bearded white man. She, like many Asian women, sought out a man who had a “Western” background so that she could feel integrated into her new home, and better than her fully Asian peers. She was by and large mentally ill, violent, abusive, cruel towards my father when he wasn’t making enough money, extremely controlling, and had self-image issues, changing her entire appearance to “look white.””

“The bigger question is why 90% of them have White fathers and Asian mothers.
Some would say porn stars are sex workers – but doing porn, for millions to see, is a particular form of self destruction. It’s a global losing of face. Nobody really likes being the child of a white-worshipping, depraved fetish couple, so obviously the children suffer.”

“The long answer: From what I’ve heard and seen, Eurasian / half-Asian pornstars outnumber full Asian pornstars, which is insane considering our small numbers…”

I need a study on probability they’ll do porn but it seems true.

The relationship itself is so loaded and so self-assuring and smug in itself (“my children will be beautiful Eurasian superhumans”) that oftentimes self-destruction is the only way to get away from such cringey people. Or even, the only way to fight back and reclaim our power and autonomy.”

“Other times when I am out with a woman, they will give me a “stare” and sometimes will even drop their boyfriends’ hand – proving that they don’t actually like the white male.”

The signs are there.

“My cousins and aunts, all of whom are in relationships with white men, are with men who are extremely awkward, weird (one has extreme allergies to virtually everything, another who is 5’5″ and can’t drive)”

I bet they read Nietzsche seriously.

“and routinely humiliate or degrade them behind their backs, or even in front of them (arguing about directions).”

More on this later.

It seems that the worst marital horror stories seem to involve White men and Asian women. Not only because of the depraved, fetishistic nature of it – but because of the amount of miscommunication, deep seated mistrust, and bizarre quality of the males involved.
I.e., Asian women, having very low standards for white males while living in Western countries, will gladly marry mentally unstable, unattractive or even violent white men n an attempt to properly integrate”

I’ll link a study today.

“Here are some brief examples, there are hundreds of thousands of these guys. Asian women are famous for being highly valued by racist white men, who view them as the antithesis to white female feminism, race traitors, and liberalism. “

Irony. Look in the mirror.

In many parts of Europe, Asian is becoming the PC term for Muslim so don’t expect that pedestal praise to go down well with many of us.

There are immense expectations to be a good little Eurasian child, to “represent” this pairing, to “represent” a merger between East and West, and to be a “master race” replacement child for both pure white children (since the White men hate White women) and for pure Asian children (which the Asian mom hates). White conservative men will attempt to “shape” or “mold” their biracial children to be perfect, as do Asian women, and the two parties are together, complicit, in a very, very political agenda.”

It’s treating a kid like an SJW experiment.

“Conservative white men who are “sick” of the “liberated” behavior of white women. “Liberated” behavior pretty much just means: white women won’t be with me because white women have too high standards. They don’t like my meek behavior.”

All the guys bragging about demanding a submissive wife are really just showing themselves up. Can you not handle your own wife?

“They will have sex with him a few times but only as long as he keeps up the image.

That’s a tell, yes.

Look at how many Asian women love taking trips to London and Paris, taking pictures of the buildings. This is just an image. Nothing else. The white man makes them feel like they’re just as good as the Parisian buildings, the Parisian street scenes they’ve seen in movies.”

Who’s the, ahem, “race traitor”?

Any time you criticize China, as Trump has discovered:

They’re the model of SJW outrage.

 

Future of America?

 

Wikipedia:
“Anti-miscegenation laws discouraging marriages between Whites and non-Whites were affecting Asian immigrants and their spouses from the late 17th to early 20th century.”
“For example, a Eurasian daughter born to an Indian father and Irish mother in Maryland in 1680 was classified as a “mulato” and sold into slavery”
Mulatto doesn’t mean what you think it means, Eurasians always counted too.

https://asiasociety.org/blog/asia/how-mixed-chinese-western-couples-were-treated-century-ago
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/kindle/2013-06/28/content_16681897.htm

“Later, World War II sparked a wave of “war bride” marriages, in which thousands of women from China, Japan and other Asian countries arrived in the US to join white partners.”
They were considered war whores, actually.
Like the French who slept with Germans.

“Additionally, Asian women have been quick to label such men as perverse when their own preferences for white men have made the pairings possible in the first place, she wrote.”
“She cited a study conducted by the dating site Coffee Meets Bagel, in which data showed that of those who specified a racial preference in potential partners, 7 percent of white men indicated Asian. Among women who specified a racial preference, the majority of Asian women picked men of the same race but 34 percent indicated a preference for Caucasian men. The numbers would seem to indicate that dating patterns between interracial couples in which the woman is Asian are most often dictated by female preference.”
That Asian women also choose partners based on race is equally offensive, she said in response to Chen’s piece.”
LOL they wanna hide.
“Dating consultants like The Asian Playboy have made fortunes teaching Asian men how to “score” with white women, imparting expensive advice about how best to convey the kind of confidence that non-Asian women are believed to value.”
Most PUAs are non-white wanting white women. Fact.

More bitching:
View at Medium.com

“I’m not blind to the fact that there are race trolls on the internet that say things such as, “control your women, not my fault asian women are race traitors,” or the classic, “asian women just like white guys more than asian guys because we’re man enough”.”

What about the self-hating white men? Takes two.

“Along with the booming trend around trafficked Asian sex workers in the Seattle’s high tech alley; Men from the tech world are paying for sex with specifically asian women in large numbers. Which doesn’t paint a positive image for the men in interracial relationships.”

See title. AFWM is typical hunting grounds.
It’s because they look like children. It’s socially acceptable pedophilia to fuck a whore who only looks of statutory rape age.

And the domestic abuse rates are higher in all mixed couples, including Asian/White.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00747.x

I’ll repost this to find easier.

White fever in half breeds

http://uncabob.blogspot.com/2016/10/high-yellow-half-breeds.html

“I’ve only met two women that I know of who were half-breeds. Both of them only slept with white guys.”

Stealing our men! (partial sarcasm)

Where did they get the right to invade European gene pools?

“The first was when I was 18 years old. She was 19, half-Indian (feather, not dot) and half-black and was raised on a reservation. She considered herself an Indian and referred to blacks as “them” and “they” and looked down on them.

Not surprisingly she only slept with white guys. I have no idea what happened to her but figured at the very least she had a child by a white man.

Also not surprisingly she hit on me. I knew the reason why: blond hair and blue eyes.

slags, they’re such slags in Asia they just hide it better

I guarantee you most Asian wives of White men are cheating on him, at least once. They got to the West, that was the goal. As long as it’s lighter, he’ll assume it’s his kid, right? Mixing men are generally stupid, they won’t get it tested.

Yet to see the IVF rates (uptake likelihood) but I suspect from the trend of C-sections and so on, they have difficulty conceiving (and carrying to term, biologically connected processes). Interventions suggest ill health and with old fathers, the risk goes up yet again.
I wonder if mixed race is less fertile in general or if it’s more one race than another they’re breeding with? What about two mixed race? Interesting questions science is too scared to answer, but I have looked into it. The study I saw, white Brit women in general were more fertile than South Asians. The study is tagged.

If there are medical problems, they have to admit it publicly to help them.

Everyone wants lighter kids.”

Imagine knowing on some level your spouse only wants you for a pigmentation gene.
Wow, that must be the worst.

“The second one was half-black and half-white and really was high-yellow. She also only slept with white guys and had a child by one, whom I once met and who had blue eyes (she also made more than one comment about my blue eyes).

[creeper alert!]

Her little girl was white. In two generations the family went from black to white.”

White passing isn’t white, genetics is real. Those genes still express in other areas including brain and they’re dominant too, throughout many generations, forever. They’ll still be the average of their parents, so shorter sons (shorter Asian genes, 4-5ft range) and stupid (maternal national IQ), likely fat daughters (father’s contribution). (Find a White-Asian mix who isn’t starving herself to look LA thin and consider the temperament, no wonder they become SJWs when the pressure cracks at college, mixed kids are mathematically more promiscuous).

Yeah, mixed race pretty much can only afford to date one another, so the white guys mixing yellow and bitching about Muh African Immigrants will likely have black grandkids or great-grandkids, it’s just statistical probability.

Nobody wants to tell them that it goes both ways?
Their kids will find other mixes attractive? And they can’t complain because they mixed too?

They don’t own their 18yo daughters like their wife. Consider the wife’s whore genetics to fuck a guy because he can upgrade her to the rich West. It won’t end well, I can’t wait for that shitshow.

PAY THE TOLL. THE OPIUM TOLL.

ask not for whom the bell tolls

it tolls for thee, cuckey

“People talk about things such as “yellow fever but I’ve never heard anyone talk about “white fever” except for those no-class blacks who go crazy around white meat, although they never use the term “white fever.” I mean non-white or part-white women who only desire white guys. They do exist.

I once encountered a black woman who basically told me, “If I have a kid by a black man the child will be black. Why should I do that when I can have a kid by a white man?””

The most calculating women because, once she’s had the kids, she doesn’t need the guy anymore.
Think about it. And white guys net more in divorce money too. These white mixers are being targeted, like Prince Harry, hilariously.
How many bitter divorced dude stories do you read in MRA forums? Well, did you assume the wife was white? That would be a mistake. You always check. If they get defensive, she was playing for the yellow tribe.

Their cultural loyalty is to wider Asian family, NOT one white man. Imagine when the markets suck again, will she throw hubby under the bus and cash out? You bet.

They’ll pressure her to.

Aw, but they wanted their obedient Mulan wife! Who’s brainwashed by Disney now?

I’ve never met a woman who expected a pumpkin to turn into a carriage but these guys think their penis can turn any Asian female into a fucking unicorn.

Can this be a condition? Penis stupidity? They’re not a magic wand, guys.

“MY waifu, what a beautiful long horn you have!”

[stabs in divorce court]

Logically, if they were so great, wouldn’t they be marrying the top crust of Asians? Seeing how we can’t perceive attractiveness accurately in other races, they usually married uggos and nobody has the heart to tell them.

Did they think she learned those sexual skills from other women? Even the infamous ugly girl’s skill in blowjob technique?

How many guys lose out in divorce proceedings because they’re white, not male? And still, they never get this?

“Some people think sooner or later we’ll all be mixed and turn into a mocha mess. That’s never going to happen.

White men are the most desired and Asian men and black women the least. I had an Asian woman tell me she couldn’t imagine an Asian man and a black woman together. White people are of the same opinion.”

White women mix out the least statistically but you wouldn’t know it by all the bitchy complaints about mud sharks, like that’s the only mixing going on. Sure, K.

Not covering for a guilty cuck conscience at all.

Tis better to have no children at all than shame thy ancestors with their enemies’ blood.

“Miscegenation used to be illegal. I know why. The children belong nowhere, at least the men.”

All the outcomes suggest terrible lives by comparison due to likely outbreeding depression but we need more data.

“There doesn’t appear to be much of a problem with mixed-breed women.”

Ha! They hide it!
It’s like tiger mom abuse. The kids hate them. Read the various blogs and forum posts hating their whore mother for hating their own Asian DNA.

“The women will be absorbed but the men won’t.”

Not by anyone of quality, like the mudsharks. Naturally, nobody will look at the 10 data in those couples but it’s a general finding that people who date out can’t afford to date in. And as soon as those guys lose the money pump in the next recession or whatever, they’ll get a nasty shock when they meet the real person they stupidly married.

Fake feminine women for fake masculine men, I love it!

Thank god they don’t marry non-narc people (both fetishists).

“I actually met the half-Indian and half-black woman when I was living in Santa Barbara and working in Isla Vista, just like Elliot Rodger, the NOWAG half-breed who went insane from lack of meaning, importance and community in his life and so slaughtered several people, starting with a couple of NOWAG Asian nerds, whom he dispatched hands-on with a knife. That’s a lot of half-breed self-hate.”

Psychiatric problems, it’s probably because mixing brain genes is like oil/water between races.
Elliot actually hated white people and especially white women, it wasn’t actually about women in general if you read some of his stuff, he was obsessed about race and how he couldn’t ever be white (racial Pinocchio). The biggest cucks marry Asians, think Zuck. It’s just a fact, they want a woman with the body (pelvic width) of a small boy, that’s pure r-selection. That guy doesn’t have options. It’s a virtue signal though, so they take it with both hands! Then they can self-hate other whites without being called a cuck (spotted ya). Asians are natural SJWs, it’s the collectivism genes. In trying to avoid moderately critical white SJWs (easily done) they’ve jumped from the frying pan into the fire. Men are nothing in Asia, the grandmothers run it. The angry, hostile, abusive grandmothers.

I can’t wait for the show to start on the massive raft of divorces for something like “white privilege” when the white guy just lost a load of money and waifu needs her Gucci to impress her friends over cocktails. So trad!

http://uncabob.blogspot.com/2015/12/sticky-asian-women-and-white-men-truth.html

Awkward red pill.
“My father was borderline-autistic, unable to make eye contact, and saw Asian women as a “replacement white woman” when he was unable to get a white woman; my mother saw his blue eyes and height and saw him as a ticket to integration and higher status in her new life in the west.”

How is that not a whore?