Mixed race regression to the mean

Since the parents are each below-average to miscegenate according to studies, the average between them isn’t much to write home about.
Hybrid vigour is a myth in humans because of regression to the mean. I didn’t explain this adequately in my hybrid vigour post because I assumed it was obvious statistics, 101.
This applies to any metric and within the same race too, it’s just that the differences inter-racially are more depressing, genetically and literally. IQ, height, blood type, psychiatric risk, cancer risk, menarche, gestation time, forensic facial architecture, lifespan all vary between races. This isn’t good for mixed children than it would have been for the child of the healthier parent with another person of similar health (intraracial). I cover a health study with psychiatric implications lower down.

Galton came up with ‘regression to the mean’ and you can see it here.

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/12/a-mediocre-mans-great-son-a-great-mans-mediocre-son/
“What is more curious is how this related to the reality of regression toward the mean. This is a very general statistical concept, but for our purposes we’re curious about its application in quantitative genetics. People often misunderstand the idea from what I can tell, and treat it as if there is an orthogenetic-like tendency of generations to regress back toward some idealized value.”

Remember, geniuses tend to have ordinary children and genius can spring from ordinary parents.
It’s easy to see regression in supermodels. Plain parents, the children of supermodels rarely match their parents, let alone exceed them.
Most mutations are bad. Each child is a petri dish of half their parents.

“So how does it work? A few years ago a friend told me that the best way to think about it was a bivariate distribution, where the two random variables are additive genetic variation and environmental genetic variation. Clearer? For many, probably not. To make it concrete, let’s go back to the old standby: the quantitative genetics of height…..”

Mostly genetic, the ‘nurture’ are epigenetic effects we don’t yet understand e.g. nutrition, less back-breaking work.

This is where many people get confused (frankly, those whose intelligence is somewhat closer to the mean!). They presume that a subsequent generation of mating would result in further regression back to the mean. No! Rather, the expected value of the offspring would be 0.16 units. Why?
Because through the process of selection you’ve created a new genetic population. The selection process is imperfect in ascertaining the exact causal underpinning of the trait value of a given individual. In other words, because height is imperfectly heritable some of the tall individuals you select are going to be tall for environmental reasons, and will not pass that trait to heir offspring. But height is ~80% heritable, which means that the filtering process of genes by using phenotype is going to be rather good, and the genetic makeup of the subsequent population will be somewhat deviated from the original parental population. In other words, the reference population to which individuals “regress” has now changed. The environmental variation remains, but the additive genetic component around which the regression is anchored is now no longer the same.
This is why I state that regression toward the mean is not magical in a biological sense. There is no population with fixed traits to which selected individuals naturally regress or revert to. Rather, populations are useful abstractions in making sense of the statistical correlations we see around us. The process of selection is informed by population-wide trends, so we need to bracket a set of individuals as a population. But what we really care about are the genetic variables which underpin the variation across the population. And those variables can change rather easily through selection. Obviously regression toward the mean would be exhibit the magical reversion-toward-ideal-type property that some imagine if the variables were static and unchanging. But if this was the matter of things, then evolution by natural selection would never occur!”

But IQ is depressed by mutation load, when they talk of ‘cognitive performance’. That’s why geniuses don’t tend to have genius children, and no, well-educated is not a proxy. Chimps can pass tests.

Steve describes regression to the mean in IQ well here.
isteve.blogspot.com/2013/01/regression-toward-mean-and-iq.html

Here’s a 2-minute clip of a professor explaining it.

http://www.unz.com/jman/regression-to-the-mean/

https://humanvarieties.org/2013/04/18/iq-regression-to-the-mean-the-genetic-prediction-vindicated/
“What kind of luck explains the fact that the children of high-IQ parents have lower IQs while they are reared in cognitive stimulating environments, when the children of low-IQ parents who were raised in chaotic environments still have higher IQs than their parents ? The IQs regress halfway (50%) to the population mean at both sides of the IQ distribution. If we stick to the Dickens-Flynn model (2001) of feedback loops, one would expect that children of high-IQ parents have higher IQ and children of low-IQ parents an IQ even lower. But the opposite happens. This criticism, in the end, does not provide any explanation for the fact that the regression is homogeneous across the different levels of IQ. As Jensen made it clear, the IQ subgroups do not depart from linearity for an IQ range going from 50 to 150.
While some say that regression to the mean occurs because of some kind of (random) measurement errors, it should be noted that IQ regression to the mean analyses are usually performed by using the method of estimated true scores, that is, IQ scores corrected for measurement error, or unreliability, with the formula :…”

Rushton brings in r/K theory here
http://philipperushton.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/iq-race-bell-curve-r-k-theory-rushton-intelligence-political-inequality-public-policy-1997.pdf
since this mating strategy also differs between race in probability, as much as individuals.
See the number of ‘single mothers’ for irrefutable proof. Domestic violence, rape by race etc.

From The Scientific Study of General Intelligence
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=rPNFXBnwuNoC&pg=PA176&lpg=PA176&dq=regression+to+the+mean+mixed+race&source=bl&ots=7MSkcTp6I1&sig=9ARvUoujsiIORB0BN-ljodWC3Ls&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjwzaDe-73UAhXpJcAKHdzaCTYQ6AEIajAM#v=onepage&q=regression%20to%20the%20mean%20mixed%20race&f=false
“4.7 Blacks and Whites regress toward their predicted racial means”
Scientifically, you’d expect this.
Statistically. As it goes on to say “no culture-only theory predicts these results.”
4.8 details rate of maturation between White, Asian and Black babies. This clearly includes the brain and does impact IQ means.
Black men also average more testosterone, which does explain the rape rates of Africa somewhat and doesn’t form a defense. Black women have it higher too, never seen a feminine jawline on one.
Whites form the medium group, we’re Goldilocks on a lot of this.
“for each characteristic, the mixed race mean fell between…”
As in, not superior than either parent. EITHER parent.
A meta-analysis in Nature back in 2015 with an overly-broad pool prone to Replicability Crisis is not a new study. Height is not a fine metric, it’s too masculine, lung capacity is too specific and ‘cognitive ability’ avoids IQ, the gold and only standard of ‘g’. It doesn’t control adequately for education (see Tiger Moms for how much crazy dominance that can be).

It’s grotesquely unfair to hold these children, already doomed in the dating world, to standards neither of their parents could meet! Is that level of control not child abuse?
https://lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/mixed-race-kids.pdf
I do sympathize with them, it is a plight because they never chose their situation, their terrible, awful parents did.
“As one might expect, on a host of background and achievement characteristics, mixed race kids fall in between whites and blacks…” and they are more antisocial than expected too. They don’t study psychiatric conditions to explain this, as they do with whites.

PubMed published “Health and behavior risks of adolescents with mixed-race identity” which nudges closer.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/
Guess the result.
“Most studies are based on clinical reports or reports of mixed-race samples without comparison to single-race groups. It is not surprising that such samples lead to the conclusion of emotional and behavior problems, as clinical samples are self-selected for problems. No national data on adolescents have been reported, except from the sample we used.”
Table 2 is useful: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/table/t2/
“…Mixed-race Whites and Asians show significantly greater risk for considering suicide, having sex, repeating a grade, and being suspended. Support for the hypothesis of greater risk status of mixed race compared with single race is most strongly supported for general health, supported for substance use…”
Ouch, guess Yellow Fever has a toll too.
Pay up.
Table 3 is specfic to combinations of race: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/table/t3/

“These analyses answer the question of whether mixed-race-identified adolescents are at higher risk than single-race-identified adolescents. .. Therefore, the overall inference from the controlled analysis is that the differences between single-race and mixed-race identifiers on the control variables we introduced are not the source of the higher risk encountered by mixed-race adolescents.”
“Previous analyses in this article have been limited to health and behavior risk variables. We examined a set of variables measuring individual and family characteristics that are not in and of themselves health and behavior risk variables, i.e., they are not attitudes, voluntary behaviors, or health symptoms. We offer 4 comparisons (family education, family structure, GPA, and PVT), each of them correlated with socioeconomic status. GPA is a measure of success in school. The PVT is highly correlated with success in school and is correlated with general intelligence tests. Because single-race respondents differ by race on these variables,”

trans. Different races are different.

“it is possible that single-race respondents also differ from mixed-race respondents on the same variables. These measures are all considered here as not caused by personal motivations, decisions, or actions with respect to family structure, family education, and PVT, and at least partially for GPA. They represent cultural opportunities and cultural handicaps. Mixed-race adolescents may be supposed to have had exposure to the cultural fates of 2 racial groups. They may therefore be hypothesized to be between the 2 racial groups with which they identify on such attributes.”

Ding ding ding regression to the mean!

“The general pattern of these nonrisk attributes is that the mixed-race groups have values that are between the values of the 2 constituent races. This lends support to the hypothesis that the mixed-race adolescents have been influenced by both racial groups and, therefore, have an experience that is between those who report the single constituent races.”

The discussion opens:

The preponderance of our evidence supports the conclusion that adolescents who identify more than 1 race are at higher health and behavior risks when compared with those who identify with 1 race only. This applies in a general way and is not distinctive to any particular race combinations. Further, it is not peculiar to any particular type of risk, but to most risks, both health and behavior.
Because risk among mixed-race adolescents is higher for all race combinations, some across-the-board explanation must be inferred….”

Did you guess nurture? They blame nurture.

so we may therefore choose to interpret mixed race as a source of stress. We cannot identify further the source of the stress. Subsequent research can start with the assumption of greater risk for the mixed-race-identified adolescent and try to identify the sources of stress. Only then can we recommend programmatic attention to mixed-race youths.”

Who wants to subject their offspring to that by choice?

What kind of atrocious parents would choose this?

…Isn’t stress biological?

Brazil can openly study it, thanks to demographic necessity.
Historical paper.
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0102-01882016000200107&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en
“In Latin America it was possible to study the negative effects of racial mixing…” – LC Brito, 2016.

Funny story.
Reports about the daughters of white abolitionists marrying blacks in the north were very common in the Southern press. An example was the marriage of Sarah Judson, whose story was published in the newspaper Memphis Daily Appeal in 1859 and according to the author, “would turn the stomach of any white.” The bride, daughter of a “radical abolitionist,” was induced by her father to marry a black man “against the designs of nature.”4″

and the origin of the word ‘miscegenation’:

The Democrats thus used a strategy to link once and for all the image of President Lincoln to the practice of amalgamation. In the heat of the electoral campaign, two democratic journalists, David Goodman Croly and George Wakeman, used a pamphlet called “Miscegenation: the theory of racial mixing applied to the white American man and the black.” The leaflet was false, and the intention of the authors, then anonymous, was to leave the impression of that it had been written by radical Republican abolitionists, supporters of Lincoln and inter-racial marriage. The text had a great repercussion in the North, where the majority of the president’s voters were based, affecting public opinion terrorized by the ideas defended in the pamphlet, which promoted racial mixing as something practiced among the most advanced nations of the world.

The text also pointed to people of mixed race as being the people of the future, a vision not very common in the United States, affirming that mixed races were superior and thereby opposed to the central justification of white superiority: racial purity (Lemire, 2002, p. 116; Fredrickson, 1971, pp. 171-174).

The pamphlet created the term miscegenation, which from then on would be used to designate mixing between people from different races. “

The propaganda has been in effect for a long time.

“The use of Latin America can be perceived in the section “Superiority of the mixed races.” Here the authors stated that the mixed races were mentally, physically, and morally superior to the pure race which had not mixed, and mentioned the example of the sambos in South America, descendants of blacks and Indians. Once again, Brazil was cited as an example of a country where the people were miscegenated, collaborating with the consolidation of the idea of mixing in the country.”

This 1860 clip from a newspaper is timely.

“Unfortunately, the Brazilian constitution considers all men equal if they are free, whether they are black men or white men. The effects of the equality of these laws do not need demonstration. This has plunged Brazil into a political revolution which has been destroying the Imperial government and its army, the majority of which is composed of blacks who will shortly dictate the terms of emancipation to the nation and the Empire will be converted into another Venezuela.”

Venezuela is currently eating their pets.

Anyway…

“Opposing the thesis of the degeneration of mulattos, the author stated that individuals of a biracial origin also could serve as an intermediate class which could reduce possible racial tensions, as had occurred in Haiti.12″

Serve?

Footnote

“According to the Webster Dictionary (1828), the term mongrel is defined as “of mixed breed, of different kinds, animal of mixed breed.” The word is associated with mingle which according to the same dictionary means ‘mixing’ and also ‘promiscuity.'”

Without specialization, a bereft quality.

You can search that site by subject but this is the only paper I found on ‘racial mixing’. I did try. Moving on…

I need to collate more data on the products of miscegenetion but the data is rarely collected, honestly interpreted and
published openly. The results don’t fit the Narrative.
There are places you can look but they’re too broad in my judgement, and miss fine-grain studies like the Asian myopia risk, based in precise genetic strains.

en.metapedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_race_mixing

http://www.deathofcommunism.josru.com/effects-of-race-mixing

On psychiatric risk,
http://www.sec-ed.co.uk/news/mixed-race-children-at-greater-risk-of-mental-health-issues
whitegenocideproject.com/study-mixed-race-people-have-identity-problems/
https://www.unc.edu/news/archives/oct03/udry10302003.html

They can’t ask for taxpayer money without admitting there’s a problem.

They tend to exclude the biracial from studies because it leads to inconvenient questions.
Example
http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/abs/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.7.1336
They must care so much.

Social outcomes suffer as well.

Asians more prone to vision issues than Whites

Ah, genetics.

Don’t count on them taking over just yet, when they can’t shoot a gun.

https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms11008#t1

“At the gene level, some genes such as SHISA6-DNAH9 have been shown to interact with education level and exhibit strong genetic effects for myopia among Asians with at least higher secondary education10. In the current study, we demonstrate that new genetic effects implicated in myopia development could be uncovered by studying interactions between genetic variants and education level.”

Psst! Heterogeneity means racial differences!

“High education level was associated with a twofold more myopic spherical equivalent in individuals of Asian as compared with European ancestry (Asians: β=−1.09 D, 95% CI: −1.20 to −0.98 D; Europeans: β=−0.49 D, 95% CI: −0.54 to −0.44 D; Fig. 1). Among Asian studies, we also observed heterogeneity of education effects for refractive error. The education effects on spherical equivalent in Singapore Chinese were significantly larger than that in other Asian studies (Singapore Chinese: β=−1.75 D, 95% CI: −1.92 to −1.58 D; other Asian cohorts: β=−0.60 D, 95% CI: −0.75 to −0.46 D).”

Asians are even distinct from one another.
Can the weeaboo supremacy crap.

“The JMA for spherical equivalent in 10,315 individuals from the Asians cohorts identified genome-wide significant association for three genes: AREG, GABRR1 and PDE10A (PJMA<5.0 × 10−8; Table 3 and Fig. 2b). SNP × education interaction effects associated with spherical equivalent were observed at all three loci, with genetic effects significantly larger within participants who had a higher level of education compared with those with a lower education level: AREG (rs12511037, βint=−0.89±0.14 D, Pint=6.87 × 10−11), GABRR1 (rs13215566, βint=−0.56±0.14 D, Pint=8.48 × 10−5) and PDE10A (rs12206610, βint=−0.72±0.13 D, Pint=2.32 × 10−8). The genotype and phenotype associations were highly significant in the higher education stratum

mfw intelligence is genetic

(main genetic effects, 1.97 × 10−10≤Pmain≤8.16 × 10−8) but were considerably weaker in the lower education stratum (0.008≤Pmain≤0.243). There was no evidence of inter-study heterogeneity at index SNPs within AREG, GABRR1 or PDE10A loci (Q-test: Phet≥0.122).
GABRR1 and PDE10A index SNPs were not associated with spherical equivalent in European samples, for either the JMA test, SNP main effect or SNP × education interaction (Table 3). AREG SNP rs12511037 was excluded in the meta-analysis of European studies after QC filtering; hence, a proxy SNP, rs1246413, in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with rs12511037 in Asians (r2=0.97) was tested but not associated with spherical equivalent (PJMA=0.527; Pint=0.176).

my genetics are my privilege

The meta-regression including study-level characteristics as covariates in the model confirmed the heterogeneity between populations of European and Asian ancestry (GABRR1: P=0.006; PDE10A: P=0.0419; Supplementary Table 4). For PDE10A, besides ethnicity, average spherical equivalent of each study also explained the inter-study heterogeneity for the interaction effects (P=0.025).”

Money shot!

It’s almost as if their culture wasn’t based around reading so much as rice farming?
As opposed to Europe, where most people could write their own name.

Yellow on the outside, shame on the inside: Asian culture revealed

http://self.gutenberg.org/eBooks/WPLBN0001235085-Yellow-on-the-Outside-Shame-on-the-inside–Asian-Culture-Revealed-by-Chi-Anson.aspx?

I am totally shocked.

Perhaps the Yellow Fever acolytes could find out what they’re letting themselves in for.

Collectivist cultures are r-selected, look at the billions in population for starters.

Collectivism is a cancer.

They appear very successful until the mass starvations. This is when they’re not poisoning baby formula.

China is more red than the West has ever been. If you hate Communism, it’s hard to take any notion of Asian Supremacy because Japan seriously.

We used to hang people for this

While obviously I do mean the paedophile, I also mean the entire family. Know a tree by its fruit. The signs must’ve been there and they knew what they let into that house. Did he like anime? Did he have an Asian ‘girlfriend’ at some point? Did he start trying to change the definition and follow some naturalistic fallacy that any woman who bleeds is fair ‘game’? The signs were there. At no point do the parents blame themselves, despite this ‘man’ living at home. Under their care. What would this be called? An honour-killing of some description, wouldn’t it?
One of the few cases where abortion is not only moral, it is vital.
Followed with the sterilization of all parties involved.

“Asians age really well”

Alternate title: Asian women age the best.

Spoken by someone who has never seen elderly Asian women.

Not to be mean, but they age worse. So much worse.
Go to a beach or look up photos of elderly Asian women on the beach if you dare.

Bikini shots if ya got em.

then there’s this ridiculous propaganda that a 49-year old can look like a 19-year old

ever

pull the other one


this applies somewhat, deceptive considering the amount of makeup and surgery, but yes menopause is the ticker

also, nada about Indians, Chinese, Pakistanis, Afghanis etc etc.

AKA most of the Asians

Recently seen a trend for Greeks and Indians. Imagine how hairy the kids omg…

Ah, this one’s familiar. The public sour expression as they tolerate the beta males because they want half-white babies. They rarely see it but everyone else does, usually as a flicker when he speaks.

When they discuss how white women age, they always go for the anorexic ones.

Not to mention bad shots of makeup, close-up, when non-whites are at a distance with better make-up.

e.g.

https://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=3708515
User ‘Black is beautiful’ asks: Why do white women age in dog years?
No bias, I’m sure.
No jealousy, certainly.
Try starting a thread asking why non-white women are so morbidly obese, even when vegetarian. That should be fun.

World War Three?

You might think this is an eerie kind of fanfiction…

it is not.

Just bear with me here. Listen a little. 2,000 words.

What if the EEC, later known as the European Union, were in fact part of a long line of Empires? A chain stretching back into Ancient times? Now, every kind of society has a maximum size, and various points of failure, like a building.

The function of each of these Empires is simple – labour. Slavery in its brutal form but productivity nonetheless.

The only means by which this can operate is control. A series of levers and social ‘memes’ that keep the whole machine ticking over, because humans must be entertained. It’s not bread and circuses, it’s hot dogs and reality TV. Consider every Empire, by size or density of its population, an experiment. A living experiment with humans much like Calhoun’s rats.

With the same dismal end.

You could relate this to the circling of the degenerate drain known as r-selection.

I’m afraid it’s a little broader than that, you’d need HBD, biohistory and various other theories including psychiatry for a complete picture.

For example, I covered the probable role of syphilis and especially neurosyphilis in the formative modern history of the West. Then there comes the obvious selection pressures of war, Black Death and various toxins, released deliberately in many cases.

The Romans probably fell in IQ due to the cumulative brain damage of lead in their piping.

The Victorians later had problems with cholera.

Basic sanitation is a key vector of disease transmission, ironically. This would relate to water fluoridation in the modern water supply, I’ve linked to its neurotoxic state, acknowledged in science.

Population control can also be achieved by sterilizing STDs, the most recent being Ebola in that is sterilizes via death. Before that, the mysterious origins of HIV and the unusual number of strains, including those tested by militaries. Naturally, this would only work if you pushed some kind of Sexual Revolution to increase the transmission potential but kept it low for your own group.

I’m getting off topic. Let’s keep to certain facts.

Each Empire was doomed to fall, based on its sheer volume of inhabitants.

This is a rule of history.

The EU has already failed based on metrics alone. Its currency has failed.

With the Euro gone, there is nothing to prop it up.

Even the human labour doesn’t exist in both the numbers and the quality (IQ) required. The fall of the EU isn’t an achievement so much as inevitability. The dysgenics put in place for the world wars guaranteed any such plan was doomed.

Much like taxation of the wealthiest (most productive within a year), you can only push so far because people break. They’ve long been suffering the slow death of inflation. This changes a person, it alters the amygdala at least. People seem less polite, more crass and less content with whatever comforts or luxuries their money buys them.

Social power never existed, it’s a polite post-war lie to cover armament for military might.

Considering all of these facts, how can I explain recent events?

Russia is not the danger. The USA is a defanged hound.

It’s China.

A war with MENA is good for the money-lenders, based entirely on the resources found there and nowhere else. How dare those pesky locals demand to be paid for what’s in their country?

Hence, open borders aka NO borders.

It’s Communism with other nation’s resources.

A war with China, however… they don’t believe China has the balls.

Oh, it does. It’s been preparing since WW2 for the next match.

It produces most goods in the world. How quickly would it win, owning all the equipment? They understood Marx well, you cannot produce tanks without a Means of Production.

This isn’t by any stretch all. To keep this short.

There are many economic unions in the world. Only the EU gets attention.

They are temporary alliances, that shall evaporate upon trial.

Nobody wants to upset China, because they’ve been selling their people’s labour at the price of slaves. To foreigners, no less! Some of the most racist people in the world! But why?

As part of a long-term plan to overthrow the West using capitalism, its own invention. Capitalism’s weakness is the honesty of white men, also why ‘free trade’ is BS. Other races prize lying to outsiders, whether you call it taqiyya or etiquette, where they suddenly stop inviting you round if you get fired. The people who seem most polite are lying, they’re hiding something.

It’s been gagging for this shot since the Industrial Revolution, and two world wars weakened us all nicely.

To sacrifice a few generations in the name of their collectivism, indulge in the West goodies but be not of it. To send some r-types overseas to settle and become key figures in politics (this is happening in America as we speak, a Red tide rises) and I already linked to the Economist ages ago predicting WHEN, not IF, but when China will overtake the US economy.

Most people would read that and go back to crying in their cornflakes about feminism.

It’s all connected. Would there be any Yellow Fever, without anime porn?

Would Western men who think they’re too smart for Hollywood porn, be so useless and lotus-eating, like the parasite single (bachelor) men of Japan, without it?

Back to the economy. When any country becomes a dominant power, it gets to play world police aka start as many wars as it likes.

Ask yourself: Is China more bloodthirsty than the US?

Has it dogmatically enforced its own culture, unlike the USA?
Has it tortured its own people to achieve?
Which tries to be the fairer?

What are the signs, you ask?

They learn Western culture e.g. the violin, religiously, to blend in.

But they do not expand the canon.

They punish their children to achieve at any cost, and top the league tables.

This allows them access to the prestige western schools, to befriend future politicians and observe any blackmail material firsthand.

What does a war need? Money and bodies.

Well, there’s a story that they could march all their fighting age men and encircle the world. They have the largest self-sustained population in the world. An excess of men. Anyone read on history knows there is only one means to get rid of a surplus of men. Who can sustain greater losses, all of the West or China?

OK, but what about one baby as a rule?

Why did they make that rule? They knew in their culture it would lead to a surplus of men. Why would a government obsessed with military investment need a huge stock of men to outnumber their main capitalist competition? They’re being trained, and not in factories.

Asia is obsessed with STEM and the military.

Why? Well, engineers and doctors are the two occupations critical to any war effort.

Ideally, you want to train your people overseas, use up their resources while building connections to exploit as informants later, and then extract them back home, depriving the enemy of key workers to subsistence peace-time level.

Gee, which race has a near-monopoly on those two occupations?

But people who read foreign papers will know they changed the baby rule recently.

Again, I ask you.

Why?

Two babies. This is interesting. It means the fighting age culled population will have sufficient females (baby 2) to breed with. It all fits.

The Marxism of China still encourages child-bearing, but the grandparents retain a prominent role to care unlike the West aka Baby Boomers.

People have been spoiling for a war since the 80s, Syria, Iran, Afghanistan, all just paper targets.

There are many economic unions and these libertarian experiments (inc. the EU) are, whether they know it or not, pawns in a wider game, the leagues before WW3. You need the upper hand before the game starts, and that’s why nobody wants to start it. The US is not the strongest player, it’s the UK because we can push the US based on our unique geography and naval supremacy. However, the US doesn’t know which enemy will rise up next, or believes in arrogance nobody will dare challenge it (naive) based on two wars it lucked out of. They can’t attack everyone.

That’s why Hitler lost.

Russia and China are in an economic alliance together, I forget which one. The US is not.

That is why both Russia and China have been buying up gold.

You only need that for one thing as a nation.

A gold standard.

China has been faking its gold exports, look up the ones pictured with a Panda hallmark.

Why do that? Aren’t they our friends?

They’ve been taking over cyberspace too. Most hacks now come from Asia, not Russia.

Why need gold practically? It can be used in electronics, especially high-tech war equipment.

They have a lot of men to equip.

If they run out, they can always use some older women. Thanks, feminism!

If China announces it’s moving to a gold standard, the USA will be forced to default.

I believe this may be the black swan you’ve all been looking for?

The EU is backed by the IMF, whose traders include Deutsche Bank, close to open failure.

Like Lehman Brothers in 2007.

UK gilts are bought off the backs of nothing, you’re supposed to trade heavily in gilts during times of war. As in, we’re fuck out of options.

The bubbles accruing on top one another for decades, sped up since ’08, will go at once like dominos. Where do we owe this money, ultimately? Not so much the Jews, although yes historically. All roads lead to China, they keep buying up Western debt, ostensibly for ‘social power’ and out of the goodness of their commie little hearts.

I wonder if we can learn anything about massive indebtedness from the Weimar Republic.

These people poison their own baby formula and don’t withdraw it from the market. They don’t care about one another (beyond direct blood relations) and they hate us.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/china-shipping-human-flesh-cans-8217761

Russia wants to be able to trade with them. This requires gold. People like Putin watch commodities over the Forex.

I don’t often talk shop or economics but this next piece is illustrative.

What’s the immigration rate of China?

So, if a series of riots were to take place based on new, entitled ‘citoyenne’ … we’d be too busy dealing with civil war (4th generation) to consider the mere possibility of another.

Does Crimea make more sense now?

How about in light of the fact that China’s greatest enemy, the Japanese, are being antagonized by North Korea as China’s bitch?

Why do that on their behalf, draw fire like that?

It doesn’t many any sense. If you’re too close to the people who hold a grudge like the Middle Eastern population only with slightly more common sense.

Which countries have retained their culture, yet appeared right-on to embrace multiculturalism?

Even Israel can’t claim that, they’re losing key demographic territory to Palestine. They’re over. Finished.

China, meanwhile, has about a billion. It can afford espionage, brain drain to export and cuddle up to the natives.

It spreads all sorts of rumours about how superior their women are, truly feminine (fake).

India will side with whoever pays them, it has a surplus of men, China has been purchasing Africa in such a ballsy colonialist move I’m astounded nobody has mentioned it.

Africa is key territory for manufacturing weapons. That’s why British Empire.

Natural resources, vital elements.

I do know more, much more, but alas, I can’t really say atm. This is all quite easy to check. The Red Scare is aimed at the wrong target, the Russians are broadly white, Christian and share our culture, including our art.

Who retains their own ‘art’ but appropriates Western culture down to our clothes and eyelids?

..Who sells the dinghies to the ‘refugee’ invasion?

http://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/2093030/rickety-boats-used-smuggle-migrants-europe-made-china

http://www.reuters.com/article/europe-migrants-china-idUSL4N1I62PD

CHINA.

I’ll drop this for now. I’ve been working on these premises for a long time, they’re accurate. I am still here and still thinking, just longer term than the stark majority of shitposters.

Look around. All I ask of you.

http://www.military.com/daily-news/2016/08/21/chinese-ships-planes-hold-war-games-sea-japan.html

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2017/05/08/Chinese-coast-guard-sails-near-Japans-Okinawa-Senkaku-Islands/5641494268445/

I’ll just leave these here. No reason. It’s all a coincidence.
http://www.thetower.org/article/chinas-deepening-interest-in-israel/
http://www.timesofisrael.com/topic/israel-china-relations/
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/israel-china-relations
http://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/2080572/china-and-israel-vow-deepen-relations
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-investment-israel-idUSKBN187080?il=0
“”China’s international surge of state-driven investments in emerging technologies should put the United States and our allies on notice,””
“”Once we became a portfolio company of these Chinese investors, they helped with opening doors in China … where the business community really relies on connections you build there.””
“”We are not worried to take Chinese money over U.S. money,” said Bar-Zeev of IronSource. “If you can deliver, there are endless opportunities.””
The EU is a distraction. The future flag is…

The G8 is nothing.

Alliances are everything.