Link: How likely is a hard landing?

http://brucewilds.blogspot.co.uk/2017/12/hard-landing-scenario-should-not-be.html
Rather.
“Those who watch closely will notice that even small changes in the laws and rules can have a big impact on how things unfold. A lot of strange almost bizarre theories are floating around concerning our economic future. This means that on occasion it is wise to step back, take a deep breath, then try to sort out what is really happening in the economy.”
Hm.
“Central banks can stack the deck but when it gets too high and begins to fall they may not be able to control the direction or who it will crush. Many of the investments people make are predicated on the idea that if the economy fails we will have a soft-landing, or if it does crash the result will not be fatal.”

If you’re stupid, yeah. We have socialist schools so we hate the markets and know they’re always doomed to crash. It’s the one useful thing we’re taught. We had to discuss hyperinflation and the crash of ’29 at length.

“The idea the economy will simply be able to adjust and grow its way out of many problems we have tried so hard to ignore and not just muddle along but to thrive defies what history has taught us. It is based on a view of history that often overlooks the many who have “lost it all” in prior periods of economic chaos.”

He speaks like they don’t deserve to burn.
You play with fire.
Worst, you play with someone else’s fire.
Someone’s retirement fire.
A nation’s fire.
I’m sure there’s a myth about this somewhere. The punishment was eternal.

http://brucewilds.blogspot.co.uk/2017/12/apple-and-amazon-share-ugly-truth-they.html

“Is the typical Apple user so self-centered that they just don’t care, or do they lust for the product so much that they bury and ignore their social conscience? These consumers are even willing to pay higher prices to lock themselves into a closed system tightly controlled by Apple.”
I know a man who uses an iPhone and has done public work against child slavery. You might have seen him on TV at some point. I mention this because trust me, that doesn’t narrow it down. Whatsoever.
It is impossible to hold a conversation on this topic. Otherwise an intelligent fellow, he mumbles and points the finger.
What dystopian relief films like Fight Club miss is how most of the people in the system and in the Matrix are complicit, knowingly and willingly so. They are objectively terrible.
When they complain about losing their ill-gotten savings, remember it’s the honest people who really paid for it in the first place. You can’t consume things you don’t produce, it’s a law of nature. If you are consuming beyond your real production (easy jobs don’t count) then someone else has been slaving away for your luxuries and if you lose them, that is justice, not an injustice. These people remind me of the entitlement of a baby who throws away its rattle (iPhone models) expecting it will always be replaced by a caretaker.

http://brucewilds.blogspot.co.uk/2017/12/china-state-driven-business-model.html
Those who surrender to the idea America is too small to lead based on population numbers do not understand that quality beats quantity hands down. Sadly the spirit of, “I will gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today” is alive and well in many of those advocating free trade and the expansion of globalism. Whether driven by greed or suffering from being short-sighted, buyers of the many products we import each year should resist giving up their futures so that we can buy the latest fancy flat screen television or set of patio furniture made in China for far less than one made in America. Countries that export goods at slightly below cost in exchange for manufacturing jobs are not stupid – they are predatory and we in America are their prey.”
Globalization isn’t free, it’s treasonous. If you want to develop another country, move there.

They don’t think it’s their future. They, the middles, aren’t the working class. They don’t care. Nobody has to care about them, then? Excellent.

http://brucewilds.blogspot.co.uk/2017/12/is-growing-national-debt-no-longer.html
All y’all need to read After the Empire: The Breakdown of the American Order.
Empires collapse, they do not slide.
Trump is an overt paper tiger to match the nation’s own power.

http://brucewilds.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/planning-sustainable-future-for-mankind.html
Good blog.
Very good blog.
“civilizations share a sharp curve of decline. Remember this is totally entwined with the economy and everyday life. Indeed, a society’s demise may begin only a decade or two after it reaches its peak population, wealth, and power.”

http://brucewilds.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/the-three-reasons-america-faces.html
You had to import the Chinese, didn’t you? The Muslims are nothing to the Red Dragon. Muslims aren’t taking the University places on your prestigious national STEM courses and taking all that knowledge back home with them, to compete against you.

America used to be smarter.

“Uncle Sam introduces Eastern Barbarism to Western civilization.” You don’t see many white women making kitten-crushing videos.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Exclusion_Act
“It was repealed by the Magnuson Act on December 17, 1943.”
“While the Magnuson Act overturned the discriminatory Chinese Exclusion Act, it only allowed a national quota of 105 Chinese immigrants per year, and did not repeal the restrictions on immigration from the other Asian countries. Large scale Chinese immigration did not occur until the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.
I hate it when I know American history better than Americans.
Sure, blame Africa. Like all the abortions of AAs have given them powerful numbers to swarm you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pace_v._Alabama
“They were charged with living together “in a state of adultery or fornication” and both sentenced to two years imprisonment in the state penitentiary in 1882.”
Those were the days.
Would SJWs really be a problem if being a massive slag (male/female) were illegal again?
You want to go back America? Want to be conservative? Are you sure you want these laws back?

Gee, why were marriages so secure, back in the days you could literally throw cheating spouses in prison?
Asians counted under miscegenation law until 1948. Pick your poison.
Even today, although all its constituent sections have long been repealed, Chapter 7 of Title 8 of the United States Code is headed “Exclusion of Chinese.”[36] It is the only chapter of the 15 chapters in Title 8 (Aliens and Nationality) that is completely focused on a specific nationality or ethnic group.”
There’s a reason for that. The first isolated communities that refused to integrate were called Chinatown.
All the much ado about Muslim bigotry has precedent in the American law for the Chinese so yes, they are right in that you can’t allow the Chinese to do something then complain when other Asians pull the same con job.
The Chinese had gangs long before the Muslims too.

http://brucewilds.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/how-great-empires-collapse.html
“One common thread and sign the end is near is a massive growth in crony capitalism and corruption. Even when the signs of decline may be everywhere that does not guarantee the end is near. As the foundation crumbles away it is not uncommon for those in power to extend their rule by many tricks and changing the rules in order to gain a new lease on life.”

Asian-European fertility issue

Partial re-post from: https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/03/30/racial-realities-mixed-race-fertility-and-neanderthals/
I wanted to expand a little because it’s ridiculous that I’m the top search result and I want to encourage public, detailed research on this topic.

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2008/10/the-prenatal-wages-of-interracial-relationships/

Speciation is an ongoing process, it’s part of evolution, also an ongoing force. As members of a sub-species, better known as race, continue to diverge over time, the characteristic event will be infertility, fertility issues, birth defects and miscarriage. Once it is born, a failure to thrive and reproduce itself would also count as an adverse selection pressure.

My simple question: do we see this?

Oh, boy. Grab a drink, tall one.

The mixed-race dating pool is limited, to the other mixed-race, for example.
This lowers the potential fitness of the organism, compared to its parents’ baseline.

I’ll take a biomedical approach, from the limited information available.

“From EurekaAlert, Asian-white couples face distinct pregnancy risks…:”
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-10/sumc-acf092508.php

Asians have a lower median birth weight, a racial difference as real as shorter African gestation periods compared to Whites.

“Although past studies have looked at ethnic differences in perinatal outcomes, the majority of research has focused on white- African-American couples. Few studies have focused specifically on Asian-white couples, said El-Sayed, who is also associate chief of maternal-fetal medicine.

More specifically, the researchers found that white mother/Asian father couples had the lowest rate (23 percent) of caesarean delivery, while Asian mother/white father couples had the highest rate (33.2 percent). Because birth weights between these two groups were similar, the researchers say the findings suggest that the average Asian woman’s pelvis may be smaller than the average white woman’s and less able to accommodate babies of a certain size.”

Nature is trying to tell you something there.

There is a clear natural selection pressure exerting itself.
Also, C-section birth puts the baby at a distinct disadvantage, those children have a weakened immune system, poorer health and fare worse in pair bonding.
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14662-c-sections-may-weaken-bonding-with-baby/
http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001973
Learning disability is on the tag list. Look for yourself.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2473493

It doesn’t decrease infant mortality and can actually kill the mother over time.
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2017/oct/04/one-in-three-us-births-happen-by-c-section-caesarean-births
It’s serious surgery.
“It becomes routine but it is still a major surgery. That carries a long-term effect on maternal health.”
“Compared with women having a vaginal birth, those having a C-section for the first time have… a 5.7 times greater risk of an unplanned hysterectomy”

Nature is telling you something there.

“El-Sayed and his colleagues also found that the incidence of gestational diabetes was lowest among white couples at 1.61 percent and highest among Asian couples at 5.73 percent – and just under 4 percent for Asian-white couples. These findings weren’t altogether surprising: past studies have shown an increased risk of diabetes among Asian couples, which researchers attribute to an underlying genetic predisposition. But the interesting finding, El-Sayed said, was that the risk for interracial couples was about the same regardless of which parent was Asian.”

Dominant genes? No!

“Because of the results on Caesarean section rates they adduce that there is a pelvic size difference between Asian women and white women. Objective male observer acquaintances of mine have generally tended to back up this phenotypic difference between the populations.”

They’re shaped like pre-pubescent boys. Why else get surgery?
You should study it formally though. Asians have the lowest sexual dimorphism and it’s important to know the numbers.

http://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2008/10/asian-white-couples-face-distinct-pregnancy-risks-stanfordpackard-study-finds.html

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2867623/

“Although births of multiracial and multiethnic infants are becoming more common in the United States, little is known about birth outcomes and risks for adverse events. We evaluated risk of fetal death for mixed race couples compared with same race couples and examined the role of prematurity and low birth weight as potential mediating risk factors.”

Miscegenation doesn’t work, even with modern medicine.
This applies to black-white pairings too.

It is a disgrace adults are marrying without knowledge of the biology involved.

“Mixed race black and white couples face higher odds of prematurity and low birth weight, which appear to contribute to the substantially higher demonstrated risk for stillbirth. There are likely additional unmeasured factors that influence birth outcomes for mixed race couples.”

I cannot find a stillbirth study for Asian-White pairings, I’m sorry. Is it so common they need not study it?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3807602/
I am looking, nobody is studying it.
I’m sorry, I am looking. It would be nicer if fewer babies were dying.

We have anecdotes?
https://www.temptasian.com/fyooz/after-3-miscarriages-the-zuckerbergs-are-finally-expecting-a-girl/
“Most people don’t discuss miscarriages because you worry your problems will distance you or reflect upon you — as if you’re defective or did something to cause this.” Mate choice is something you did. The baby didn’t choose to be conceived by you two. Part of your biology must be defective because miscarriage is an outcome of defective conception and/or pregnancy (there are many possible reasons, some environmental, a few random plus ‘stress’). It sounds cruel but yes, medically, something is wrong.

OT: Jews have a non-White miscarriage rate.
Jews invented/funded IVF because they needed it.
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/assisted-reproduction-and-judaism
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.529569
Israel is a eugenic ethnostate.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Fishel#Early_life_and_education
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1182091/
“The issue of the rate of recurrent miscarriages in high-risk Jewish women is unresolved.”
I am biting my tongue.

When trying really hard, the only evidence for hybrid vigour in White Americans vs. mulattos, which they sought to prove (scientism) is “relatively small.” …Is it present or not?
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature14618
“this study provides evidence [DS: the evidence isn’t proof?] that increased stature and cognitive function have been positively selected in human evolution, whereas many important risk factors for late-onset complex diseases may not have been.”
That’s bullshit, everyone is getting taller and getting better grades.
May not have been? In Nature?
Listen to the twisting in this: http://www.medicaldaily.com/g00/interracial-couples-may-make-taller-smarter-children-due-greater-genetic-diversity-341348
“Meanwhile, human evolution is more focused on the ability to create healthy offspring and have them survive infancy to continue raising them.”
Yes.

…Yes, it is.

“Whether you come from a genetically diverse background or not, in the end even the most common medical ailments that affect society will affect everyone, with genetic diversity having little to no impact.”
No, genes. The most common fatal medical ailments aren’t a cold, they’re genetic-based, it’s established fact. And if it had no impact, why push it?
“It combines the parents’ genetic material, resulting in offspring that possess a unique set of genetic blueprints that increase their chances of surviving and thriving compared to a population with limited genetic variability.”
No such thing. Limited genetic variability? No such thing. Where is this thing?
They’re just talking absolute crap to cover how their study was a non-result. Every genome is unique, between twins even. Thriving and surviving varies by individual genome, that should be studied by the natal people. You know this. You hide the scant data that is there with delusions. This is propaganda. It continues:
“This encapsulates Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection,”
No, he wrote a whole book. Look at the subtitle to The Origin of the Species.
Natural selection is about death and mortality, which you have not studied. Disease is not death.
“where individuals with characteristics that increase their probability of survival”
how? like being able to give birth?
“will have more opportunities to reproduce,”
in a limited dating pool
“according to the University of California, Berkeley’s Understanding Evolution.”
If California understood evolution, it would be Alaska.
“As a result, their offspring will benefit from the variants,”
no, not if they’re the more common disadvantageous mutations or if the combination is novel and fatal
“which will spread throughout the population.”
No, you’re assuming they breed. Infertility exists, and it exists on a spectrum.

http://theconversation.com/being-south-asian-is-as-great-a-risk-factor-for-stillbirth-as-smoking-80074
There would be signs.

“This is an increased risk equivalent to smoking, advanced maternal age or obesity.”

“While other research has found the mother’s ethnicity places a role in the risk of a stillbirth, this has largely been put down to factors related to migration and social disadvantage. What our research shows is women born in South Asia and giving birth in Australia are at increased risk even when other factors are taken into account.”

D.N.A.

“There is growing evidence to suggest a mother’s ethnicity influences how fast her placenta ages as her pregnancy progresses.”

Asian placenta is old, got it.

“For some women, they can go into spontaneous labour sooner. In our study, we found South Asian-born women went into labour a median one week earlier than Australian- or New Zealand-born women.”

Racial differences in gestation duration, again.

“However, for others, an ageing placenta cannot meet the fetus’ increasing metabolic needs at term and beyond. And this increases the risk of stillbirth.”

Infertility, insufficient maternal resources for the fetus. That’s a kind of infertility. Considering how skinny they are and how those female curves are supposed to feed a baby, historically, this is not surprising.
Nature is aborting babies that would starve. Before it kills the mother too.

“And the length of telomeres in placentas from pregnancies ending in stillbirth are two times shorter than those from live births. In other words, the placental cells had aged faster.”

Superior Asian genetics people might wanna cover their innocent eyes.

“Some researchers have also studied ethnic differences in placental telomere length.
In an American study, placental telomeres from pregnancies in black women were significantly shorter than from pregnancies in white women (the ethnic backgrounds of the women were not further defined in the study).”

Superior European placentas. As you’d expect for the one race hit hard by an Ice Age. Perhaps this is an unknown r/K variable.

“Whether telomeres are shorter in placentas from pregnancies in South Asian-born women is unknown.”

Oh, I think I can guess.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4272534/

“There was a high prevalence of stillbirth in this multi-ethnic urban population. The increased risk of stillbirth observed in non-White women remains after adjusting for other factors.”

Whites are different? Biologically? Shudder-gasp!

Let’s see if BMI matters.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/1860462
Yes. Of course it does. They only studied high BMI though.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4392932/

“However, BMI does not take into account the relative proportions of fat and lean tissue and cannot distinguish the location of fat distribution”

“However, these are based on information derived from the general population, based on risk of mortality, without consideration for racial or ethnic specificity and were not determined to specifically identify those at risk for diabetes. Recently, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention presented initial findings from an oversampling of Asian Americans in the 2011–2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. These data, utilizing general population criteria for obesity, showed the prevalence of obesity in Asian Americans was only 10.8% compared with 34.9% in all U.S. adults (13). Paradoxically, many studies from Asia, as well as research conducted in several Asian American populations, have shown that diabetes risk has increased remarkably in populations of Asian origin, although in general these populations have a mean BMI significantly lower than defined at-risk BMI levels (14,15). Moreover, U.S. clinicians who care for Asian patients have noticed that many with diabetes do not meet the published criteria for obesity or even overweight.”

So we’d need to look at WHR, instead of BMI.

New Evidence on Waist-Hip Ratio Reveals Surprising Relationship to Fertility, Urges Revision of Attractiveness Theories

“In women, the connection between WHR and health measures appears to be hormonal. It is known that ratios of estrogen, progesterone, and prolactin affect all of these features. The “right” balance promotes both health and low WHR. One version of the “attractiveness theory” posits that our attraction to this body shape developed as an indicator of overall health.”

“Another crucial part of the attractiveness theory of wait-hip-ratio (WHR) is that this body shape has to be indicative of something related to fertility, or else it wouldn’t have any evolutionary value.

The key feature in a potential mate is biological fitness, that is, the potential to give birth to many healthy and successful offspring.

Desirable females, in the evolutionary sense, are those that are likely to be healthy, fertile, and robust.

Robust = pelvis, btw.
Venus was never a narrow-hipped vixen.
The body acceptance people should really focus on the hips.

A low WHR, it is thought, must correlate with fertility (ability to have children) and/or fecundity (tendency to have large numbers of children).”

There is such a thing as too low. Boyish figures have less fat, fewer curves and narrower hips.
They’re confusing women who have obesity and babies for State money with natural attractiveness, fecundity in the state of nature and blurring BMI with WHR. Nobody said unhealthy (low) WHR is wealthy, for fecundity. That’s a strawman. The hormones and other details, medical details, are better profiled in the most nubile WHR range. It is a range. Don’t line graph me, study.

It doesn’t mention race although many women in the world do not have a figure. Unless you count a figure of 1.

Hormones and junk: http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/health-what-a-man-cant-resist-the-perfect-waist-hip-ratio-forget-about-breasts-says-jerome-burne-its-1440859.html

“The waist is one of the distinguishing human features, such as speech, making tools and a sense of humour,’ says Professor Singh. ‘No other primate has one. We developed it as a result of another unique feature – standing upright. We needed bigger buttock muscles for walking on two legs.”

If the waist makes the human, a lot of women are fucked.

The ideal ratio in healthy pre- menopausal women ranges between 0.67 and 0.8. In terms of the tape measure, this is produced by waists between 24in and 28in with 36in hips, and waists between 27in and 31in with 40in hips.”

A range.
…How many Asian women have a 36″ hip?
The fat ones I’ve seen were pufferfish.

“come puberty, the sex hormones start directing it differently.”

sexual dimorphism

“Oestrogen, the hormone of female sexual characteristics, concentrates it on the buttocks and hips while the masculinising hormone testosterone encourages fat to form around the waist.’ At the same time testosterone encourages fat to be burnt off the buttocks while oestrogen takes it off the abdomen.
These characteristically feminine fat stores are used in the last months of pregnancy and during breast-feeding. This is another reason why women who are seriously underweight often stop menstruating – they would not have the resources to support a pregnancy or a baby.”

Confetti time.

“Women with a low ratio, Professor Singh says, tend to start ovulating younger, and those with a high ratio find it more difficult to become pregnant and tend to have children later. [not by choice]
Although a high waist-hip ratio most commonly goes with being overweight, it can also be found in women of normal weight who have high testosterone levels – a condition that is also associated with being hairy, infertile and having a ‘male’ body shape.”

Manly body, fertility problems. Study it. Avert tragedy.

“In a survey of 106 men aged 18 to 22, the favourite was a female of average weight with the classic hour-glass figure. Not only were such women rated as young, sexy and healthy, they were also seen as ideal for childbearing.”

Again, sexy is different from beautiful.
Porn is a lie.

“The young men regarded the underweight women – defined as women of 5ft 5in weighing less than 90lb – as ‘youthful’ but not particularly attractive, especially for childbearing.”

To prefer the obese over the mannish figured for motherhood is huge.
Youthful is code for making them feel like a pedophile.

“In Professor Singh’s other surveys, men of all ages agreed with these findings – thus bearing out her theory of the waist-hip ratio.”

Women dropped the corset to signal they weren’t just baby-making machines.
It’s hard to test low-WHR women in a world of obesity.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn4953-barbie-shaped-women-more-fertile/

“Women who were extremely underweight or overweight were not included.”
Study them separately?
Porn is making you drawn to infertile women, with boy hips. Conditioning.

WHRxfertility
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886904003617
“Figures of average weight and a WHR of 0.7 were rated as most attractive and healthy.”
It is important.

I want to see a study that looks at racial WHR against pregnancy issues.
Is that so hard to ask?

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109051381200044X

“These data indicate that BF% appears to be a strong cue for attractiveness and that the impact of WHR and BMI on attractiveness is dependent, in part, on BF%. The appearance of body fat may provide disruption in the visual cues of both shape and size of the female body, potentially impacting behavior.”

Speciation is determined by biological compatibility in sum. This includes many factors. On none I have seen do Asian-White hybrids succeed over their parental groups’ averages; even IQ gains, if true, would be worse for the individual’s own fertility rate.

The only other thing I could think of is a study on STD rates between couples.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2117964
http://sti.bmj.com/content/87/Suppl_2/ii14
http://www.expat.or.id/medical/stds.html
“The association between travel and STDs has been known for centuries”
What’s the Asian version of burn the coal? Pick the chopstick, get ripped?
http://global-disease-burden.healthgrove.com/l/24974/Syphilis-in-Southeast-Asia
Prevalance: “fairly common.”
The wages of sin. You can’t blame the white man.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02438113
Syphilis present in Asian archaeological samples.
http://www.scmp.com/news/asia/east-asia/article/2060294/young-women-among-sufferers-japan-records-huge-spike-syphilis
“Endemic syphilis”
https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1952297-overview
http://sti.bmj.com/content/76/6/415
‘referred to as “the intraracial network effect,”’
Oh, that’s why they don’t study it.
“suggest that assortative mixing prevents the spread of STI to other subpopulations.”
“A number of studies in the literature, many of which did not measure biomedical markers of STI, suggest that mixing across subpopulations may contribute to spread of STI in the population, particularly across subpopulations.”
If you increase the microbe’s exposure to different parts of the human genome, it will evolve faster. Simple?
Age groups can be a larger factor, since the older immune system is weak and better for the microbe.
“In a recent study conducted in Seattle we found that most of the disease burden for gonococcal and chlamydial infections in both high prevalence and low prevalence subpopulations was attributable to mixing within the subpopulations”
I think we’ve found the reason white women mix out the least. Same reason we don’t like to eat meat raw – to avoid disease.
‘the proportion of infection attributable to indirect mixing, or so called “bridge populations,”
So it is attributable and naturally must inform sexual behaviour.
“While we found that sexual mixing between particular racial ethnic subpopulations increased the risk of STI significantly, the proportion of the population engaging in sexual mixing, and the numbers of sex partners reported by individuals engaging in sexual mixing across racial-ethnic subpopulations were too low for this increased risk to play a major part in disease burden.”
Hybrid vigour, guys!
The risk isn’t the major part, it’s fine! Water’s fine!
“The literature on racial-ethnic differentials in STI rates and the role of racial ethnic mixing on the spread of STI is emergent; many questions still remain unanswered.”

If miscegenation were unhealthy, we’d know, right?

Fun IQ list

https://iq-research.info/en/page/average-iq-by-country

They never account for racial purity, so naturally that will alter the average if the natives are also lumped in with new citizens.

I say it’s fun because

Comparing countries is finer grain than race. Asians v. Nords.
Naturally, the widespread Asian academic fraud previously covered makes the uppermost numbers suspect.

Observe

some familiar names.

Can the superiority complex, America.

Wait, wait, wait.

Hang on.

Still going.

Maybe the high-IQ Asian waifu plan isn’t so smart.

You marry hookers, they’ll take all your money.
reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/3iqtob/for_those_who_think_going_to_the_philippines_for/

Why did you ever think this was a good plan?
All you need is ONE picture.

Now, tell me:

Which continent has the higher average IQ, Europe or Asia?

In American;

Which continent has less yellow in it?

American is simpler than English because –

e t e r n a l   a n g l o, huh?

Spain, my current location, is as smart as you. Diego are not renowned for being brainy.
You’d be helping the deported by sending them to Spain, from the US.

Vegas shooter

I’m not saying anything.

Note: until a terrorizing motive is established, he isn’t technically a terrorist, just burning in Hell. Targeting a country music show especially has triggered me. Whole families go there.

I wonder, was the motive that no one wanted to start a family with it?
Forever Alone bachelor gambler rage? And who brings a machine gun with a drum, who was funding this?

Does the West deserve to die?

Where are the men in this compilation?
We know most weebs are men. We know most hardcore weebs are men.

Just go on a tumblr tag for MLP if this isn’t hardcore for you.

tumblr.com/tagged/<term>

4:34 This is ACTUALLY insulting to Asians.
There are interesting parts to the cultures like the philosophy but all anyone foreign wants to talk about is anime and vaginas.
For all they say that what you watch as a child doesn’t influence you, why are there essentially no European history cartoons? We’re surrounded by Asian stuff. And Princess culture has been totally ripped off by America, who literally fought a war to reject monarchy. You made your choice. No princesses for you, quit drooling over our future Queen.
5:59 is ripe for conversation but someone will get triggered and take it out on me so I’ll leave you to the dungeon of your thoughts.
Oriental fetishes don’t solely apply to men. It’s like cultural chinoiserie.
This kind of fake pep also makes me hate white people.

Common Filth should do a show like all this.
ALL this.

He’d go for it, I think.

Tempted to go and trash myself for spending too much time on a computer now.

I remember when we were kidding about the anime.

I feel old.

Yeah, I don’t think they’re faking it.

Art that proves geisha weren’t prostitutes

Totally not, perish the thought.

Links are NSFW, in case you didn’t guess. Perverts:

http://www.dreamideamachine.com/en/?p=2838

I mean… you’d have to be so crass and uncultured to know about this stuff.

They needed to live next to the red-light districts because rents were cheap!
OB-viously.

http://onestoparts.com/review-shunga-japanese-art-british-museum-london

What is more, genitals are magnified and extremely detailed, with the almost shocking presence of realistic body hair. 

You’d have to be crazy to assume that’s erotic, right?
We can’t assume porn and prostitution were the aim here.

 Depictions of ancient legend and folklore are also common topics, with one of the most unorthodox prints on display by Katasushika Kyosai illustrating a woman being pleasured by an octopus.

The translation of the accompanying text would make even the most hardened viewer blush, once again showing the British Museum’s commitment to a non-censorship policy.

Since we (((all))) know only white women can be whores, huh?

Love hotels totally aren’t an Asian thing.
LBFMs? Never heard of ’em.

It is still indisputable that these pieces are works of art, and the second section “Masterpieces of Shunga 1765-1850” goes on to reveal even more elaborate works. Hand-scroll for the Four Seasonsby Tsukioka Setti is a mesmerising piece of work painted on silk, celebrating the different phases of a woman’s sexuality. The use of gold leaf and even iridescent inks to enhance the presence of bodily fluids is something that seems so alien to traditional European viewings of art that it is both shocking and liberating.

Madonna/Whore also plays into Yellow Fever versus non-Yellow.

Did the children they bear come into being by magic?

https://joi.ito.com/weblog/2003/04/28/are-geisha-pros.html

Glorify mistresses all you want, there is sex exchanged on one side for money on the other. Okay she’s literate, but so were courtesans. They provide literally the exact same role as European courtesans, and your cultural chinoiserie won’t change that.

Asia was always more degenerate than us, just look at the art. Worse on torture techniques too, than the Medieval Europe era. Men can get tea and conversation from other men. There’s only one thing they’d pay a beautiful woman for in excess…. it isn’t simpering.

And if you think the art had no influence either way on actual behaviour… nothing can cure your stupidity. Europe had chamber art, same function.

https://chaari.wordpress.com/2010/02/13/did-geisha-engage-in-acts-of-prostitution/

“Ukiyo-e expert Gina Collia-Suzuki, in a recent brief but strong blog entry, attacks this notion, asserting that geisha of the Edo period absolutely *did* engage in acts of prostitution, though it should not be confused for being a part of their primary profession.”

Same with courtesans, male ones were primarily entertainers too.
But are entertainers paid that much, to exclusively socialize with only the richest?
Wouldn’t sexual exclusivity make a little more sense..?

“Collia-Suzuki also claims that Mineko Iwasaki, the geisha whose life, revealed through interviews, was the basis of Arthur Golden’s novel, was essentially lying when she denied that the mizuage ceremony involved the selling of a geisha’s virginity for money.”

It’s embarrassing we pedestal anyone like this.

https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/a/19556

I’m not disrespecting anyone, I’m being accurate.
I don’t want to post all of these because that isn’t my type of blog but…

So respectful!

They’re just wrestling, right? Totally innocent.

JUST KISSING – what any sane person would conclude.

Her legs need to be open because all that silk is hot and she’s just… ventilating… yeah… sexy ventilating…

 But in actuality, the centuries of shunga speak for themselves, offering a joyous and sensational viewing experience.

I AGREE.

They speak louder than any weeaboo on the subject.

There are so many more links on this topic but honestly, this is so obvious that I’m embarrassed I have to post about it. Are you new to the internet?

Why are Asians against Yellow Fever?

As a token, common example.

I came across this,

https://nextshark.com/asian-dating-website-creepy/


Fake femininity, told ya so. It’s fake as Bella Hadid’s plastic face.

They drop it when you put a ring on it – or stop making so much money.
They also drop it around other women, especially white and/or blonde women (seen as competition), which is how I know from plenty of experience. They do have a bitch side, every woman does, and if you’ve never seen it, it must be BAD.

Vaguely controlling in a distinctly abusing manner, behind a veneer of sweetness.
Read around, the worst kind of abuse happens with a smile. They do it knowing it’s hard to say no. Feminine wiles? Toxic ones.

To be fair, in some ways they have to be behaviourally conditioned as female and kittenish, girlish, to get a date, it’s a social pressure. If they behaved like mature and serious adults, the disconnect to their pedomorphic features would creep even a fetishist out.

They’re the biggest SJWs too but, sure, white women are the only gold-diggers in existence (???).
If the poor woman being hit on and harassed by these guys doesn’t go along with it, they chalk it up to a demure culture rather than being a bitch. Because all white women are sluts, right?

They say they’re attracted to Asians…
Until she refuses to dress, talk and act the way they want.
Usually like a teenager.
Nothing creepy about this at all. Controlling? Men? Domestic abuse rates?
Don’t look at this pesky things! That’s misandrist!
As she points out, it is …what is it they call it? Positive racism?
They still have their ‘white privilege’ even if they breed out. You don’t lose the racist card to SJWs.
The fetishists are still all about the women-pleasing and putting random women on pedestals, only they took a love of anime too far.
I feel sorry for the women fetishized who didn’t want any part in this, like the women that tool grabbed by the neck in Japan.
WTF is wrong with these borderlines and narcissists? The former is difficult to spot in men but they fear abandonment and therefore seek control in relationships, the guys going on and on about how a white woman would 100% divorce them but an Asian never would (I should look up those stats) are pinging.
Why does she show her guns, you might wonder?
Well, the lower dimorphism in Asians means the women are more masculine (by androgyny) than the average white. So they aren’t even more feminine, the culture has to enforce this!
That is precisely why the biggest SJWs are now Asian. They’re opposing the culture that tells them to fake femininity to get men interested. The future of social justice is yellow, with black back-up.

Peruse
http://creepywhiteguyspart2.tumblr.com/
at your pleasure
They don’t even like these women, and these women know it.
I’m on the side of the gold-digging Asian at this point, these bastards deserve it.

They think Asians are ‘tame’ and will hereby put up with any rudeness, up to and including abuse (including the lesser-known sexual sadism, ropes and choking and such).

http://iamwizz.tumblr.com/post/153009511824
“You shouldn’t have needed it, but if you did need proof to the “you can date a POC and still be extremely racist?” HERE IT FUCKING IS.”

They’re still called racist because if anything they’re more racist than whites who only date other whites.
They’re seeing the person, not the complexion. For signalling points?
Nobody deserves to be spoken to like this. No human.
Grade A proof of the Mantrum too. It’s literally nothing to do with him. They’re emotionally unstable but have no period to blame.
Thankfully the non-white women are onto the fact that there are crazy white men with personality disorders who think ‘dating down’ gives them an excuse to be abusive.